From http://www.security-policy.org/papers/2000/00-D76.html }}>Begin Publications of the Center for Security Policy No. 00-D 76 DECISION BRIEF 28 August 2000 Lights Out at los Alamos? (Washington, D.C.): On Sunday, the Washington Post gave unusual front-page, above-the-fold treatment to an obituary. Well, technically the article would not qualify as an obit since the subject -- the Los Alamos National Laboratory's nuclear weapons program -- has not fully expired just yet. Perhaps it would be more accurate to describe the report entitled "Dark Cloud Hangs over Los Alamos" as a kind of ghoulish death watch or the print equivalent of an electronic life-signs monitor, tracking the ebbing away of the expertise and intellectual vitality that has for three generations made this laboratory a national treasure. Los Alamos' death throes should come as no surprise, though. They are the inexorable result of a denuclearization agenda that has animated the Clinton- Gore Administration's "stewardship" of the Department of Energy's nuclear weapons complex. What Really Ails the Lab To be sure, the hemorrhage of the remaining handful of physicists with first- hand experience in the design, testing and long-term maintenance of the U.S. nuclear deterrent is partly a function of actuarial factors and attractive early retirement packages. Indisputably, it has been further exacerbated by the morale-crushing environment at the Lab in the wake of investigations into security lapses that have resulted in the incarceration and prosecution of one long-time Los Alamos scientist, Wen Ho Lee, and that are causing others now under scrutiny in connection with errant, highly classified hard drives to incur each week multi- thousand-dollar lawyer's bills. Then there is the lingering effect of a conflagration deliberately set by the U.S. government that destroyed some 400 homes in the community and threatened to immolate parts of the laboratory itself. Such considerations alone would doubtless prompt at least some of the Nation's most brilliant scientists with rarified computer skills much in demand in the private sector to seek employment elsewhere. 'Erosion by Design' The truth is, however, that -- as grim as the situation is at Los Alamos -- it is but a microcosm of the ever-more-moribund condition of the nuclear weapons complex as a whole. And the responsibility for that condition lies squarely with a Clinton-Gore Administration that has deliberately appointed incompetents and anti-nuclear ideologues to run the military part of the Department of Energy into the ground. This began under President Clinton's first Energy Secretary, Hazel O'Leary -- a woman whose lack of expertise in the nuclear weapons arena was matched by her utter disdain for that part of her portfolio, and for those who had devoted their professional lives to it. Her contempt became a matter of public knowledge when in December 1993 she announced her determination to declassify "miles" of secret documents she thought need no longer required safeguarding: "I want it clear that I'm gonna be, as usual, the person pushing harder to get it done [i.e., declassifying information] and someone else has the job of looking more carefully at the national security interest." Mrs. O'Leary used her four-year tenure as Secretary of Energy to undermine public confidence in the U.S. nuclear weapons program even as she has systematically acted -- through policy decisions, budgetary actions and programmatic steps -- to jeopardize that program's ability over time to maintain the safety, reliability and credibility of the Nation's nuclear deterrent. This sorry record was documented in a scathing assessment issued near the end of the O'Leary era by the House National Security Committee. On the occasion of its release in October 1996, Committee Chairman Floyd Spence, Republican of South Carolina, declared: The past four years have witnessed the dramatic decline of the U.S. nuclear weapons complex and the uniquely skilled workforce that is responsible for maintaining our nuclear deterrent. The Administration's laissez-faire approach to stewardship of the nuclear stockpile, within the broader context of its support for a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, is clearly threatening the Nation's long-term ability to maintain a safe and reliable nuclear stockpile....In my mind, it's no longer a question of the Administration's 'benign neglect' of our Nation's nuclear forces, but instead, a compelling case can be made that it is a matter of "erosion by design." (Emphasis added). Unfortunately, neither of Mrs. O'Leary's successors -- two politicians chosen for their Hispanic-American heritage rather than the experience needed to redress their predecessor's mis- and malfeasance -- have made appreciable course corrections. To the contrary, under Federico Peña and Bill Richardson, the wrecking operation has largely continued apace. As a result, the United States today has no capability to manufacture significant quantities of nuclear weapons. Instead, what remains of its production complex is working "twenty-four/seven" to dismantle what remains of our deterrent arsenal. Worse yet, rather than focus exclusively on such pressing problems as how to maintain -- to say nothing of how to upgrade(1) -- that obsolescing arsenal, enormous laboratory resources (human and financial) are being diverted to dubious purposes. These include figuring out ways in which to maintain the Russian nuclear weapons program's scientific and physical infrastructure and how to give away seed-corn technology developed by the national labs at enormous expense taxpayer. The EUV Debacle A case in point was the recent decision by the Department of Energy to break with previous policy and allow foreign companies to gain access to extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) technology -- a revolutionary means of mass- producing high quality semiconductor chips. As Under Secretary of Commerce William Reinsch wrote his Energy Department counterpart, Ernest Moniz, in May of this year: The aim [of the government-sponsored EUV program] was to position U.S. companies to lead and hopefully dominate international markets with next- generation semiconductor manufacturing equipment and semiconductor chips. It is an American program with global implications, not a global program that was started with international sponsors....Your decision allows [a wholly owned subsidiary of Germany's Siemens AG] to take part ownership of the EUV Limited Liability Corporation -- and overnight to position itself on an equal technology footing with U.S. competitors -- for what is at best three percent of the value of the technology in its current state. Implementing an Unratified CTBT What is more, Clinton-Gore arms control theologians insist that the labs' scientists must be denied the one tool that has proven effective in assuring the continued safety, reliability and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear arsenal: realistic underground testing. Incredibly, the Administration is proceeding to implement the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty -- at a cost of untold millions of dollars and thousands of manhours -- as though the Senate had not decisively rejected that accord as inconsistent with America's national security interests. Congress should immediately assign the Government Accounting Office the task of assessing the full costs being incurred by the executive branch in this transparently unconstitutional action and take steps to foreclose further U.S. actions aimed at facilitating or otherwise participating in the implementation of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. The Bottom Line Now that Governor Bush has made the Vice President's responsibility for the erosion of the U.S. military a major element of his campaign for the White House, he would be well advised to add to his indictment the Clinton-Gore legacy of denuclearizing the United States -- a legacy that may well prove among the most time-consuming, costly and challenging to undo. - 30 - 1. One of the unsung heroes of Los Alamos' efforts to preserve its trained cadre and continue the lab's tradition of excellence in the service of national security is its Associate Director for Nuclear Weapons, Dr. Stephen Younger. Dr. Younger has recently written a thoughtful essay entitled "Nuclear Weapons in the Twenty-First Century" that should be required reading for those who wish to understand, and hopefully to fix what is ailing the nuclear weapons complex and the forces it is designed to support. NOTE: The Center's publications are intended to invigorate and enrich the debate on foreign policy and defense issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of all members of the Center's Board of Advisors. Top of Page © 1988-2000, Center for Security Policy End<{{ A<>E<>R Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the State among its hapless subjects. His task is to demonstrate repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the "democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse of objective necessity. He strives to show that the existence of taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled. He seeks to show that the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded subjects. [[For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard, Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]] <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
