-Caveat Lector-

NOTE: The following articles were writtten by people who seem to view
claims of Satanic Ritual Abuse as the result of "false memories" and
"hysteria"; I suspect that these children WERE ritually abused...

``This was the mother of all these cases,'' says the Kniffens' attorney

++++++++

http://www.edwardhumes.com/kniffens.htm

4 to appeal molestation convictions
>From the Bakersfield Californian  ---  [7/14/96 ]

By TAMARA KOEHLER ; Californian staff writer

They were what most people would call good parents: Coaching their two
young sons in soccer, taking them to church. They were children
themselves of upstanding, close-knit families. Brenda and Scott Kniffen
were certainly not what most people would think of when conjuring up
pictures of sexual orgies and child pornography. But these seemingly
ordinary, middle-class parents, whose ancestral roots stretch back to
the country's heartland, would soon give birth to a national hysteria.
They and their friends, Alvin and Deborah McCuan, would become
defendants in the first prosecution of a child molestation ring in the
1980s, a case that spawned a decade of similar cases nationwide,
including the notorious McMartin Preschool trial in Los Angeles.

``This was the mother of all these cases,'' says the Kniffens' attorney,
Mike Snedeker, who will be arguing their case again this week in Kern
County Superior Court. The Kniffen-McCuan case is complete with chilling
tales of stolen innocence and sexual torture, stories that horrified
local law enforcement, social workers and ultimately a Kern County jury.
But it also is a tale of questionable interrogation tactics,
controversial medical evidence and children who later recanted their
testimony.

On Monday, the two couples _ convicted in 1982 of molesting their own
children in freakish orgies _ will appear before Superior Court Judge
Jon E. Stuebbe by order of the 5th District Court of Appeal, which has
overturned several other local molestation ring cases from the 1980s.
Reporters from ABC's news magazine ``Turning Point'' and other national
journalists will document the hearing. Despite the questions raised
about the way the case was handled, the Kern County district attorney
and the courts remain steadfastly in favor of keeping the Kniffens and
McCuans in prison.

Two years ago, a motion for a new hearing in the Kniffen-McCuan case was
denied in a terse, three-page written ruling by Kern County Superior
Court Judge Kenneth Twisselman. Snedeker appealed to the 5th District,
which ordered the Kern County courts to hold a new hearing and allow
attorneys to argue new evidence. That new evidence will include
testimony from national experts blasting the way social workers and the
district attorney's office interviewed the children as well as medical
evidence undermining a doctor's diagnosis of molestation in the case,
Snedeker said. If Snedeker and a team of Bakersfield defense attorneys
are successful in proving the Kniffens and McCuans did not receive a
fair trial in 1982, the judge will overturn their sentences and
convictions.

Those sentences reflect the feelings of the time. The Kniffens, at ages
30 and 31, were convicted of 70 felonies each and sentenced to 1,000
years in prison _ terms much longer than those given Charles Manson or
Jeffrey Dahmer. That sentence was later reduced to 240 years each. The
McCuans were convicted of 75 felonies each. McCuan, then 30, was
sentenced to 268 years in prison; his wife, then 27, was sentenced to
252 years in prison.

The victims were the couples' own children, according to prosecutors _
the Kniffens' 6- and 9-year-old sons and the McCuans' 5- and 8-year-old
daughters. In gripping detail, the children testified they were hung
from hooks and raped, forced into bestiality, and sold for sex to
strangers at hotels in the small mountain town of Lebec. Brandon and
Brian Kniffen, now 23 and 20, have both recanted their testimony against
their parents. The two girls have not.

Prosecutor Collette Humphrey says she is not concerned about the
appellate court's recent reversals or the Kniffen boys' retractions.
``They've recanted, then unrecanted, then recanted again; what are you
going to believe?'' she said. ``I don't know if they think they're going
to wear us down or what (by bringing the appeals) but we'll fight this
case until doomsday if we have to.'' Today, the Kniffens' sons are
bitter, says Teresa Shipp, a cousin of Brenda Kniffen. They believe
they've been molested by the system, she says. They want their parents
home.

Throughout their 12 years in prison, the Kniffen family has stood by
their imprisoned relatives. Scott Kniffen's parents _ Richard and
Marilyn _ hired a private detective to prove their son and
daughter-in-law were wrongly convicted. They used up their life savings
accrued through Richard Kniffen's successful business as an accountant.
They raised Brian and Brandon. And when they died three years ago, the
elderly couple left their house to Scott and Brenda _ a place to come
home to one day. ``Getting this case reversed is not so much a mission
for me as it is like taking the garbage out,'' says Snedeker, an
attorney from Portland who co-authored ``Satan's Silence,'' a book about
hysteria over ritual abuse. ``This was a garbage case, like something
out of an Alfred Hitchcock movie. These people were in the wrong place
at the wrong time.''

The place was Kern County and the time was 1982. It was the beginning of
a 33-month period of fear in this county, where urban sprawl threads
through cotton fields and residents' trust in police is second only to
trust in God. From 1982 to 1985, neighbors eyed each other with distrust
and police tore up entire parcels of land looking for bones of
sacrificed babies. During this time, 51 people were accused of being
involved in molestation rings. Four fled the county and 47 were
arrested.

``It was a time of paranoia,'' recalls Stan Simrin, who earned an
acquittal for the boyfriend of a social worker also accused in the
Kniffen-McCuan case and will be working with Snedeker in court this
week. ``Everyone in law enforcement was looking at people with the worst
suspicions in mind. They were going out and terrorizing whole groups of
people, digging for bones; it was a time of real fear.''  The most
notorious case erupted in June 1984, when a minister and five others
were accused of molesting a 5-year-old girl _ a charge that mushroomed
into 500 accusations of mass murder, cannibalism, satanism and
kidnapping.

That investigation began with then-Sheriff Larry Kleier's pledge that
every resource of his department was available to a special sheriff's
task force on ritual abuse. District Attorney Ed Jagels offered the
services of investigators and legal help. The Welfare Department, with
workers newly trained in spotting signs of satanic ritual abuse,
promised to assist investigators. For months, sheriff's deputies dug
holes in the backyards of suspects, looking for dead babies. In one
instance three years after accusing their own parents of sexual torture,
the McCuan girls told FBI agents and Atascadero police they saw satanic
murders in their grandparents' Atascadero home. For three days, the
officers dug up a brushy hillside in San Luis Obispo County. Nothing was
found. The girls had never before made claims of satanism in the three
years of court hearings against their parents. Their accusations only
surfaced after they entered counseling with Carolyn Heim, a social
worker who operated a therapy group for molested children at the
Henrietta Weill Memorial Child Guidance Center in Bakersfield.

``Basically, I think these therapy groups at the (Henrietta Weill)
center were at the root of the problem,'' Snedeker said. ``This social
worker goes to a seminar on satanism and all of a sudden there's a bunch
of satanic ritual abuse in Kern County.'' Heim worked closely with the
Sheriff's Department and Sheriff's Sgt. Brad Darling, head of the
department's satanism task force. In May 1984, Darling visited
detectives investigating allegations concerning owners and teachers at
the McMartin Pre-School in Manhattan Beach. Darling told the detectives
to suspect everyone and that in Kern County he had investigated lawyers,
doctors, a reserve deputy sheriff, a coroner's office employee, a
mortuary owner and a cemetery owner.  More accusations of child
molestation rings in which children were photographed nude, sold to
strangers for sex and other atrocities continued to surface until 1986,
when the state attorney general's office issued a scathing report on
Kern County's investigation methods. No one was spared from criticism,
including the district attorney's office, the courts, the sheriff and
welfare department.

``It seemed to die down after the attorney general's criticism of the
local district attorney's office,'' Simrin said. ``Before in these
cases, almost all the children interviews were being done without tape
recording. Now these kinds of interviews are always taped so we can get
to the truth. Is it the child who is telling these things or the
investigator?'' Jagels would not comment for this story. His office
issued guidelines in 1986 on interviewing techniques of children,
requiring that conversations be taped.

The McCuans and Kniffens' case began at the insistence of Mary Ann
Barbour, the grandmother of the McCuan girls and Alvin's mother. The
McCuan girls stayed six weeks every year with the Barbours. One day in
1980, the older McCuan girl, then 7, told Barbour she had been molested
by Rod Phelps, her stepgrandfather and the husband of Deborah Mc-Cuan's
mother. Barbour took the girl to a doctor, who detected signs of sexual
abuse.  Phelps was arrested and later skipped bail and town with his
wife, Linda Phelps, who also was accused.  About this time, Barbour was
diagnosed as being obsessive about molestation and was locked in Kern
Medical Center's psychiatric ward after she waved a gun around and
threatened to commit suicide in 1981. Her medical records were kept
secret until they were subpoenaed the next year.

A few months later, the girls accused their father, Alvin. Social
workers, unaware of Barbour's medical history, placed the children in
the Barbours' home, and their mother was allowed only supervised visits.


Soon, just about everyone Barbour knew or resented was accused of
molesting the girls, according to Snedeker and court records. Social
worker Betty Palko, who gave a positive evaluation of the McCuans' day
care program operated out of their home, was arrested along with her
boyfriend Larry Walker.

Barbour told social workers the girls named the Kniffens as well, who
were friends of the McCuan family. The girls also accused their uncles,
Larry and Tom McCuan.

The Kniffen boys, along with the girls, were taken to counselors at the
Henrietta Weill center, who led the children through a series of
suggestive questioning sessions, Snedeker says.

``The social workers would have anatomically correct dolls and get the
kids to name the private parts with whatever name they had for them like
`wee-wee,' '' Snedeker said. ``Then they would ask the kids questions
like, `Did daddy put his wee-wee in yours?' They'd get the children to
give yes or no answers. Today, we know that it is very easy to generate
false memories in children.'' During the investigation, the children
were isolated from all family members and treated like ``they were being
deprogrammed from a cult,'' Snedeker said.

Transcripts from each stage of the hearings show Brian and Brandon
changed their testimony under lengthy questioning by deputy district
attorney Andrew Gindes, who prosecuted many of the child molestation
ring cases in Kern during the 1980s.

Barbour could not be reached for comment.

At this week's hearing, Dr. Maggie Bruck will testify that the way the
children were questioned in the Kniffen-McCuan case as well as cases
nationwide in the 1980s most likely implanted false memories into their
minds. Bruck, a psychologist at the McGill University in Montreal, is
known nationally for her work on children's suggestibility and has
conducted numerous studies since the 1980s.

The defense attorneys also will be questioning the medical testimony
presented at the first trial by Dr. Bruce A. Woodling, a Ventura
physician who examined the children and who also was used in the
McMartin case. Woodling's reliance on a physical examination method
called the ``wink test'' did not meet scientific standards, according to
Snedeker.

Other cases around the country that relied heavily on this test have
fallen apart. Recent studies published in pediatric journals show that
49 percent to 62 percent of children who have never been molested
respond positively to the wink test, a reflex measurement of the rectal
muscles. The method is now discredited in the medical community.

Since the 1980s, wrongful claims of molestation have seemed to die down,
but Simrin fears the hysteria that fosters such cases is still simmering
in American communities.

Currently, the small town of Wenatchee in Washington is besieged with
such fear. About 40 people have been arrested in this agricultural area
on suspicion of swapping children around in sex rings.

``It's always the same,'' Snedeker says. ``It's always the marginalized
people living on the edge of town who are picked up for this sort of
thing. The whole town gets upset, into a frenzy of fear, and everyone
afraid of being the next one accused.''

Simrin said he still sees the lingering shadow of fear in Bakersfield,
left over from the 1980s' panic.

``It was a climate of fear which to some extent even affects us today in
terms of teachers afraid of being alone with kids and people are afraid
that the most innocent act will be turned into a ghastly crime.''

====

http://www.nemasys.com/rahome/resources/ra_cases.shtml

Bakersfield:


Alvin and Deborah McCuan, Scott and Brenda Kniffen, and Rodney and Linda
Phelps (parents of Deborah McCuan) were indicted in 1982 on charges of
sexually molesting children. The alleged victims included their own
children, traded between families and used for group sex, as well as
children from the Bluebird troop run by Deborah McCuan and the
unlicensed day care facility in her home. The McCuans and Kniffens were
convicted on all counts in 1983, drawing aggregate prison terms in
excess of 1,000 years. The Phelps fled town and disapeared after being
charged with 33 counts.

Ritual elements in the case were ignored by authorities at the time.
(Newton, 1996).

In August 1996, a judge overturned the child molestation convictions of
Alvin and Deborah McCuan and Scott and Brenda Kniffen.** (Northwest
Herald, August 14, 1996).



A second intrafamilial child-sex ring was exposed and prosecuted in
Bakersfield, with trials continuing into 1985. Five adult defendants
were convicted, including: Richard Cox, 47 (14 counts); Ruth Ann Taylor,
31 (14 counts); Anthony Cox, 25 (7 counts); George Cox, 24 (7 counts);
and Theresa Cox, 21 (3 counts). Prison terms ranged from 10 to 41 years.
(Newton, 1996).



Seven defendants in another Bakersfield child-sex ring were convicted in
August 1985, with multiple charges including child molestation and
endangerment, assault with a deadly weapon, and production of child
pornography. Wayne Forsythe, 28, was convicted on 41 separate counts.
Other defendants, each convicted on a minimum of 50 counts, included
Forsythe's wife, Colleen Dill Forsythe, 26; Ricky Pitts, 31, and his
wife Marcella Pitts, 29; Wayne Dill, 26 (Colleen Forsythe's brother);
Grace Dill, 50 (mother of Colleen Forsythe and Wayne Dill); and Gina
Miller. Cumulative prison sentences in the case came to 2,100 years.
(Newton, 1996).



Leroy George Stowe III was convicted on 16 counts of child molestation
and sentenced to 30 years in March 1985. Shortly after his conviction,
victims in the case expanded their disclosures to include graphic
descriptions of satanic ritual abuse and murders, involving nine more
defendants.

In January 1987, Gerardo Gonzales (facing 117 charges) pleaded no
contest to one count of molesting a 5-year-old girl, and Rev. Willard
Lee Thomas (facing 43 charges) pleaded no contest on two counts,
including child endangerment and unlawful sexual intercourse with a
17-year-old girl. Both defendants were released from jail on the basis
of time served, and charges against the remaining defendants were
dismissed as part of their plea bargain.

In February 1987, a California appeals court reversed Leroy Stowe's
conviction on 12 of 16 felony counts, with the grounds cited as a
technical insufficiency in the pleadings.** (Newton, 1996).


====

http://www.ags.uci.edu/~dehill/witchhunt/cases/kern_county.htm

Articles on these cases culled from the FMSF and Witchhunt Mailing Lists
(opinions are those of the authors):

**********************************************************************
F M S   F O U N D A T I O N   N E W S L E T T E R     (e-mail edition)
Vol 5 No. 8, September 1, 1996
**********************************************************************
3401 Market Street suite 130,  Philadelphia, PA 19104,  (215-387-1865)
**********************************************************************
 . . .
 ___________________________________________________________________

 Judge Frees 2 Couples Imprisoned 14 Years in Child Molestation Case
                San Diego Union-Tribune Aug. 14, 1996

  Two couples will be freed from prison following dismissal of their
convictions of child molestation because authorities repeatedly asked
the children leading questions thereby tainting their testimony. Scott
and Brenda Kniffen and Alvin and Deborah McCuan will not be retried
because so many years have passed and because two Kniffen boys now say
they were not molested.

  In the Kern County Superior Court ruling, Judge Jon Stuebbe wrote,
"It is apparent to this court that the result of the interviewing
techniques used in this case was to render fundamentally unreliable
the children's testimony at trial." This included "telling the child
reports of abuse would help their parents and they could all go home
and live together again."

  These families are two of several who were prosecuted for sexual
molestation in Kern County in the 1980's and have since had their
convictions overturned.
                       ________________________




Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 07:39:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Freyd)
Subject: Victory in California

  Carol Hopkins writes:

Kern County Superior Court Judge Jon Steubbe today [Mon, Aug 12]
overturned the convictions of the Kniffens and McCuans!!!  He has
ordered that they be released immediately. These two couples were
convicted during the Kern County "sex ring" trials and have served
fourteen years. Mike Snedeker was the appellate attorney who prevailed
after also obtaining overturned convictions in a number of the other
Kern County cases.

  For some of the background:

**********************************************************************
F M S   F O U N D A T I O N   N E W S L E T T E R     (e-mail edition)
Vol 4 No. 8, September 1, 1995
**********************************************************************
         ____________________________________________________

         APPEALS COURT OVERTURNS CHILD-MOLESTATION CONVICTION
                     Fresno Bee, August 10, 1995
                           Robert Rodriguez

  Donna Sue Hubbard was convicted of child molestation in 1985 and
given a 100-year sentence. The 5th District Court of Appeal overturned
the conviction which was one of the famous Kern County cases during
the mid 1980s. "The climate at the time was one of mass hysteria,"
said Glenn Cole, former Kern County grand jury foreman.

  "There is substantial likelihood that the children's resulting
testimony was false and thus unreliable," appellate Justice Thomas
Harris wrote. The court also faulted the trial judge for faulty
instructions to the jury. The decision will result in a new trial if
prosecutors choose to retry the case.

 According to the article the "allegations began 10 years ago when
police investigated the possible molestation of a 6-year-old boy by
one of Hubbard's neighbors. As investigations continued, the
allegations became increasingly detailed and horrific. The neighbor
was accused of "tying him up -- placing him on a wall hanger with
either a rope, harness or chain -- and molesting him."  Investigators
found only a small cup hood with a shank three-eights of an inch long
in the apartment.

  Hubbard became involved after a neighbor said that Hubbard's son was
also at the neighbor's house. She became a suspect after a paid
informant "accused her of receiving money for allowing others to
molest her son."


**********************************************************************
F M S   F O U N D A T I O N   N E W S L E T T E R     (e-mail edition)
Vol 4 No. 9, October 1, 1995
**********************************************************************
   _________________________________________________________________

  "MANY KERN COUNTY (CALIFORNIA) MOLESTATION" CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED
                        _Fresno Bee_, 8/30/95

  On August 7, 1995 the 5th District Court of Appeal in California
overturned the conviction of Donna Hubbard. She was one of 37 people
convicted in the early and mid-1980s as Kern County prosecuted eight
"rings" of child molesters. Since that time, 14 of the 26 people found
guilty have had their convictions overturned.

  Hubbard and two men were convicted in 1985 of the molest of
Hubbard's 9-year-old son and two other boys. She was sentenced to 100
years. Hubbard's son later recanted much of his testimony.

  In its 470 page opinion, the Appeals Court was sharply critical of
the Kern County investigators' interview methods. The court noted that
investigators repeatedly used leading questions and conducted numerous
interviews with the children.  The court said that there was
"substantial likelihood" that Hubbard's conviction was based on false
evidence.


++++++

M. F. Abernathy -- [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- 04/07/02

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to