-Caveat Lector-

http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/10-22-99.html

Fall Semester:
Supply Side University Economics Lesson #5

Memo To: SSU students
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: Theory and Policy; Mundell to Reagan

exerpts

  This semester’s emphasis is on the political side of the political economy,
which affords me the special opportunity this week to discuss Robert
Mundell’s Nobel Laureate in economics and how his theories elected a
President and changed the world.

and

  Only one week earlier, Laffer and I had met with Dick Cheney, the deputy
White House Chief-of- Staff, to make the case for a Ford tax cut instead of
his promised tax increase.  Cheney’s boss, Donald Rumsfeld, had not been
chief-of-staff at the time Ford swallowed the advice on a tax increase to
fight inflation, so he was open to switching to a tax cut, especially after
the GOP lost four dozen seats in the November off-year elections.  I had
explained to him that the voters were not blaming congressional GOPers for
Nixon or Ford’s pardon of him, but for Ford’s promise of a tax increase.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average was in the 500s, its lowest point in
decades.  When Cheney could not grasp the concept of two tax rates producing
the same revenue, one at a higher level of production, Laffer grabbed a
cocktail napkin and drew his famous curve... which I named for him in 1977
when I wrote "The Laffer Curve" as Chapter Six of my book, "The Way the World
Works."

and

  Reagan’s research director, Jeff Bell, had read the Mundell-Laffer
Hypothesis and he saw in it a winning issue for his boss.  Bell, though, had
to fight the Old Guard politicos around Reagan, who would not buy the idea of
a self-financing tax cut. Bell came up with a $90 billion tax cut that would
be financed with $90 billion in spending cuts, a zero-sum approach that was
doomed from the start, made worse when Bell let slip a proposed list of the
spending cuts. Ford’s camp attacked the cuts as harsh and cruel and the
outcry forced Reagan to drop the plan altogether, thereby losing his lead in
the New Hampshire poll, and in the end losing the nomination fight by a
handful of votes.

and

He took these findings to Reagan and argued that in 1980, Reagan should
embrace the supply-siders and run not on a zero-sum plan, but on the dynamic
model implied by the Laffer Curve.
---------------
also by the same author, Jude Wanniski:

http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/07-26-00.html

exerpt

  Cheney also understands and appreciates supply-side economics better than
any of the other veep candidates, having been present at the Creation, so to
speak. I would not call him a supply-sider, because he is not that confirmed
in his policy views, but it would be much easier with him on the team to
persuade a President Bush to name someone like Steve Forbes to be Treasury
Secretary. This would be necessary to force badly needed reforms of the IMF
and World Bank.

  By the way, the Laffer Curve was first drawn by Laffer to demonstrate to
Dick Cheney, then deputy White House chief of staff to Rumsfeld, in December
1974, that tax rates could be lowered without loss of revenue. I was sitting
at the table at the Two Continents Restaurant with Laffer and Cheney, saw the
Curve sketched on a cocktail napkin, realized its importance, and
subsequently named it the "Laffer Curve." At the time, the message got
through to Cheney at least to the point he and Rumsfeld persuaded President
Ford to drop his push for a tax increase and switch to a tax cut, albeit one
poorly designed by the Treasury. It was actually a "tax refund," with no
supply-side effects.
-----------------------------
http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow/kudlow072400.html

National Review On-Line
Kudlow's Take
7/24/00
Cheney the Supply-Sider
He was one of the original tax-cut crusaders

exerpt

  After the session broke up, I was collecting my papers, feeling kind of
lonely, when Dick Cheney came up to me to chat.  By then the Wyomian was
Republican Whip in the House. He told me that he really enjoyed my talk and
agreed with me that the Reagan tax cuts worked successfully.  We were
standing alone drinking coffee when President Ford walked over. Cheney told
Ford, "You know, Mr. President, Kudlow here is right."  Ford responded by
looking me straight in the eye saying, "Kudlow, you're my favorite
supply-sider.  But I don't believe a word of it."
---------
Samantha

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to