-Caveat Lector-

visit my web site at  http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon
My ICQ# is 79071904

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 20:54:17 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SNET: This HAARP Is NOT For Angels......

->  SNETNEWS  Mailing List

WASHINGTON'S NEW WORLD ORDER WEAPONS
HAVE THE ABILITY TO TRIGGER CLIMATE CHANGE...
Surprise!.


 URL for this article is
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/haarp.htm
 For printer-friendly version, click here.

                        www.tenc.net
                       [Emperor's Clothes]

    Washington's New World Order Weapons
   Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change
               by Michel Chossudovsky [11-26-2000]

 Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa, author of The
 Globalization of Poverty, second edition, Common Courage Press,
 2000.

 The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a

 partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating
impacts of
 greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World's climate can
now
 be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated "non-lethal
 weapons." Both the Americans and the Russians have developed
capabilities
 to manipulate the World's climate.

 In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency
 Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the ("Star Wars")
 Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests
that
 HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially
triggering floods,
 droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP
is
 a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument
of
 conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and
ecological
 systems of entire regions.

 While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used,
surely
 the United Nations should be addressing the issue of "environmental
 warfare" alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse
gases...

 * * *

 Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate
climatic
 manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN

 agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the
 environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference on
 Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of
 "weather warfare" or "environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)" as

 relevant to an understanding of climate change.

 The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and American
 business lobbies has centered on Washington's outright refusal to abide
by
 commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997 Kyoto
 protocol.(1) The impacts of military technologies on the World's
climate are
 not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to greenhouse

 gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington's
strategic
 and defense objectives.

 "WEATHER WARFARE"

 World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that "US military

 scientists ... are working on weather systems as a potential weapon.
The
 methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor
rivers in
 the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods." (2)
Already
 in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had
 foreseen in his book "Between Two Ages" that:

      "Technology will make available, to the leaders of major
      nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which
      only a bare minimum of the security forces need be
      appraised... [T]echniques of weather modification could be
      employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm."

 Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several
types of
 "unconventional weapons" using radio frequencies. He refers to "weather

 war," indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already
"mastered the
 know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought)

 in the early 1980s."(3) These technologies make it "possible to trigger

 atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar
 [waves]." (4)

 A simulation study of future defense "scenarios" commissioned for the
US
 Air Force calls for:

      "US aerospace forces to 'own the weather' by capitalizing on
      emerging technologies and focusing development of those
      technologies to war-fighting applications... From enhancing
      friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via
      small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete
      dominance of global communications and counterspace control,
      weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of
      possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary... In the
      United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of
      national security policy with both domestic and international
      applications. Our government will pursue such a policy,
      depending on its interests, at various levels. (5)

 HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURAL RESEARCH
 PROGRAM (HAARP)

 The High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) based in
 Gokoma Alaska --jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy--
is
 part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US
Strategic
 Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research
Laboratory's
 Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful
 antennas capable of creating "controlled local modifications of the
 ionosphere". Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich --actively involved in the
public
 campaign against HAARP-- describes HAARP as:

      "A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of

      the ionosphere [upper layer of the atmosphere] by focusing a beam
      and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back
      onto earth and penetrate everything -- living and dead." (6)

 Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as "a gigantic heater that can cause
 major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long
incisions in
 the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the
planet."
 7

 MISLEADING PUBLIC OPINION

 HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific
and
 academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that

 HAARP's main objective is to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of
 Defense purposes." (8) Without explicitly referring to the HAARP
program,
 a US Air Force study points to the use of "induced ionospheric
modifications"
 as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy
 communications and radar.9

 According to Dr. Rosalie Bertell, HAARP is part of a integrated
weapons'
 system, which has potentially devastating environmental consequences:

      "It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly
      destructive programs to understand and control the upper
      atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with
      the space laboratory construction which is separately being
      planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a
      long history of space research and development of a deliberate
      military nature. The military implications of combining these
      projects is alarming. ... The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/
      rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy,
      comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and
      particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be
"sold"
      to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or,
      for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer.
      (10)

 In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related
uses:

 "HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the

 atmosphere with high-frequency rays... Returning low-frequency waves at

 high intensity could also affect people's brains, and effects on
tectonic
 movements cannot be ruled out. (11)

 More generally, HAARP has the ability of modifying the World's
 electro-magnetic field. It is part of an arsenal of "electronic
weapons" which
 US military researchers consider a "gentler and kinder warfare". (12)

 WEAPONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

 HAARP is part of the weapons arsenal of the New World Order under the
 Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). From military command points in the
US,
 entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through
climatic
 manipulations. More importantly, the latter can be implemented without
the
 knowledge of the enemy, at minimal cost and without engaging military
 personnel and equipment as in a conventional war.

 The use of HAARP -- if it were to be applied -- could have potentially
 devastating impacts on the World's climate. Responding to US economic
and
 strategic interests, it could be used to selectively modify climate in
different
 parts of the World resulting in the destabilization of agricultural and

 ecological systems.

 It is also worth noting that the US Department of Defense has allocated

 substantial resources to the development of intelligence and monitoring

 systems on weather changes. NASA and the Department of Defense's
 National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) are working on "imagery
 for studies of flooding, erosion, land-slide hazards, earthquakes,
ecological
 zones, weather forecasts, and climate change" with data relayed from
 satellites. (13)

 POLICY INERTIA OF THE UNITED NATIONS

 According to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
 signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro:

 "States have... in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations
and the
 principles of international law, the (...) responsibility to ensure
that activities
 within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the
environment of
 other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction."
(14)

 It is also worth recalling that an international Convention ratified by
the UN
 General Assembly in 1997 bans "military or other hostile use of
 environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting
or
 severe effects." (15) Both the US and the Soviet Union were signatories
to
 the Convention. The Convention defines "'environmental modification
 techniques' as referring to any technique for changing--through the
deliberate
 manipulation of natural processes--the dynamics, composition or
structure of
 the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere
or of
 outer space." (16)

 Why then did the UN --disregarding the 1977 ENMOD Convention as well
 as its own charter-- decide to exclude from its agenda climatic changes

 resulting from military programs?

 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ACKNOWLEDGES
 IMPACTS OF HAARP

 In February 1998, responding to a report of Mrs. Maj Britt Theorin
 --Swedish MEP and longtime peace advocate--, the European Parliament's
 Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public
 hearings in Brussels on the HAARP program.(17) The Committee's "Motion
 for Resolution" submitted to the European Parliament:

      "Considers HAARP... by virtue of its far-reaching impact on
      the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal,
      ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an
      international independent body...; [the Committee] regrets the
      repeated refusal of the United States Administration... to give
      evidence to the public hearing ...into the environmental and
      public risks [of] the HAARP program." (18).

 The Committee's request to draw up a "Green Paper" on "the
environmental
 impacts of military activities", however, was casually dismissed on the

 grounds that the European Commission lacks the required jurisdiction to

 delve into "the links between environment and defense". (19) Brussels
was
 anxious to avoid a showdown with Washington.

 FULLY OPERATIONAL

 While there is no concrete evidence of HAARP having been used,
scientific
 findings suggest that it is at present fully operational. What this
means is that
 HAARP could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively
modify
 the climate of an "unfriendly nation" or "rogue state" with a view to
 destabilizing its national economy.

 Agricultural systems in both developed and developing countries are
already
 in crisis as a result of New World Order policies including market
 deregulation, commodity dumping, etc. Amply documented, IMF and World
 Bank "economic medicine" imposed on the Third World and the countries
of
 the former Soviet block has largely contributed to the destabilization
of
 domestic agriculture. In turn, the provisions of the World Trade
Organization
 (WTO) have supported the interests of a handful of Western agri-biotech

 conglomerates in their quest to impose genetically modified (GMO) seeds
on
 farmers throughout the World.

 It is important to understand the linkage between the economic,
strategic and
 military processes of the New World Order. In the above context,
climatic
 manipulations under the HAARP program (whether accidental or
deliberate)
 would inevitably exacerbate these changes by weakening national
 economies, destroying infrastructure and potentially triggering the
bankruptcy
 of farmers over vast areas. Surely national governments and the United
 Nations should address the possible consequences of HAARP and other
 "non-lethal weapons" on climate change.

 NOTES

 1. The latter calls for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by
an
 average of 5.2 percent to become effective between 2008 and 2012. See
 Background of Kyoto Protocol at http://www.globalwarming.net/gw11.html.

 2. The Times, London, 23 November 2000.

 3. Intelligence Newsletter, December 16, 1999.

 4. Ibid.

 5 Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report,
 http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ (emphasis added).

 6 Nicholas Begich and Jeane Manning, The Military's Pandora's Box,
 Earthpulse Press, http://www.xyz.net/~nohaarp/earthlight.html. See also
the
 HAARP home page at http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/).

 7. See Briarpatch, January, 2000. (emphasis added).

 8 Quoted in Begich and Manning, op cit.

 9. Air University, op cit.

 10. Rosalie Bertell, Background of the HAARP Program, 5 November,
 1996, http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/envronmt/weapons.htm

 11. Begich and Manning, op cit.

 12. Don Herskovitz, Killing Them Softly, Journal of Electronic Defense,

 August 1993. (emphasis added). According to Herskovitz, "electronic
 warfare" is defined by the US Department of Defense as "military action

 involving the use of electromagnetic energy..." The Journal of
Electronic
 Defense at http://www.jedefense.com/ has published a range of articles
on
 the application of electronic and electromagnetic military
technologies.

 13. Military Space, 6 December, 1999.

 14. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, 1992. See
 complete text at http://www.unfccc.de/resource/conv/conv_002.html,
 (emphasis added).

 15. See Associated Press, 18 May 1977.

 16. Environmental Modification Ban Faithfully Observed, States Parties
 Declare, UN Chronicle, July, 1984, Vol. 21, p. 27.

 17. European Report, 7 February 1998.

 18. European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and
 Defense Policy, Brussels, doc. no. A4-0005/99, 14 January 1999.

 19. EU Lacks Jurisdiction to Trace Links Between Environment and
 Defense, European Report, 3 February 1999.

 (C) Copyright by Michel Chossudovsky, Ottawa, November, 2000. All
rights
 reserved. Permission is granted to post this text on non-commercial
 community internet sites, provided the essay remains intact and the
copyright
 note is displayed. To publish this text in printed and/or other forms
contact
 the author at [EMAIL PROTECTED], fax: 1-514-4256224.

 Department of Economics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N6N5 Voice
 box: 1-613-562-5800, ext. 1415, Fax: 1-514-425-6224 E-Mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; (Altern. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

 ***

 Some other articles by Michel Chossudovsky

      'The IMF & World Bank Just Two of the Instruments
      for National Destruction' at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/instru.htm

      'In the 21st Century - Global Poverty' at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/global.htm

      'Kostunica Coalition Drives Up Prices &
      Blames...Milosevic' at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/triples.htm

      'NATO Willfully Triggered Environmental Catastrophe
      In Yugoslavia' at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/willful.htm

      'Seattle and Beyond: Disarming the New World Order'
      at http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/seattle.htm

      'State Terror and the Free Market: Opening up Kosovo
      to Foreign Capital' at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/opening.htm

      'The Trepca Takeover: Part of a Pattern of
      Criminalazing Kosovo'at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/opening.htm

      'The UN Appoints an Alleged War Criminal' at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/unandthe.htm

      'Washington Votes Massive 'Aid' to Opposition in
      Yugoslav Runoff' at
      http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/wash.htm

      ***

  We get by with a little help from our friends...

 We receive all our funding from who have a critical attitude toward
Official
 Truth.. We would like everyone to read Emperor's Clothes whether they
can
 afford to contribute financially or not, but if you can make a
contribution,
 please do. Recently we were shut down for almost a week by a hacker. We

 are taking steps to improve our security and also to increase the
number of
 people who hear about Emperor's Clothes. These improvements cost money.

 Small contributions help and so do big ones.

 To make a donation, please mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box
 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321. (USA)

 Or click here to use our secure server.

 Or call 617 916-1705 between 9:30 AM and 5:30 PM, Eastern Time (USA)
 and ask for Bob. He we will take your credit card information over the
 phone.

 Thanks for reading Emperor's Clothes.

                      www.tenc.net
                    [Emperor's Clothes]


-> To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to