-Caveat Lector-

Statement of Senator James M. Jeffords
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=1904
     Burlington, Vermont

     May 24, 2001

     Anyone who knows me, knows I love the State of Vermont.

     It has always been known for its independence and social
     conscience. It was the first state to outlaw slavery in its
     constitution. It proudly elected Matthew Lyon to Congress,
     despite his flouting of the Sedition Act. It sacrificed a
     higher share of its sons to the Civil War than perhaps any
     other state in the Union.

     I recall Vermont Senator Ralph Flanders' dramatic
     statement almost 50 years ago, helping to bring to a close
     the McCarthy hearings, a sorry chapter in our history.

     Today's chapter is of much smaller consequence, but I think
     it appropriate that I share my thoughts with my fellow
     Vermonters.

     For the past several weeks, I have been struggling with a
     very difficult decision. It is difficult on a personal level, but it
     is even more difficult because of its larger impact on the
     Senate and the nation.

     I've been talking with my family, and a few close advisors,
     about whether or not I should remain a Republican. I do not
     approach this question lightly. I have spent a lifetime in the
     Republican Party, and served for 12 years in what I believe
     is the longest continuously held Republican seat in the U.S.
     Senate. I ran for re-election as a Republican just last fall,
     and had no thoughts whatsoever then about changing
     parties.

     The party I grew up in was the party of George Aiken,
     Ernest Gibson, Ralph Flanders, and Bob Stafford. These
     names may not mean much today outside Vermont. But
     each served Vermont as a Republican Senator in the 20th
     century.

     I became a Republican not because I was born into the
     party but because of the kind of fundamental principles that
     these and many other Republicans stood for moderation,
     tolerance, and fiscal responsibility. Their party our party
     was the party of Lincoln.

     To be sure, we had our differences in the Vermont
     Republican Party. But even our more conservative leaders
     were in many ways progressive. Our former governor,
     Deane Davis, championed Act 250, which preserved our
     environmental heritage. And Vermont's Calvin Coolidge,
     our nation's 30th president, could point with pride to our
     state's willingness to sacrifice in the service of others.

     Aiken and Gibson and Flanders and Stafford were all
     Republicans. But they were Vermonters first. They spoke
     their minds – often to the dismay of their party leaders –
     and did their best to guide the party in the direction of our
     fundamental principles.

     For 26 years in Washington, first in the House of
     Representatives and now in the Senate, I have tried to do
     the same. But I can no longer do so.

     Increasingly, I find myself in disagreement with my party. I
     understand that many people are more conservative than I
     am, and they form the Republican Party. Given the
     changing nature of the national party, it has become a
     struggle for our leaders to deal with me, and for me to deal
     with them.

     Indeed, the party's electoral success has underscored the
     dilemma I face within my party.

     In the past, without the presidency, the various wings of the
     Republican Party in Congress have had some freedom to
     argue and ultimately to shape the party's agenda. The
     election of President Bush changed that dramatically. We
     don't live in a parliamentary system, but it is only natural to
     expect that people such as myself, who have been honored
     with positions of leadership, will largely support the
     president's agenda.

     And yet, more and more, I find I cannot. Those who don't
     know me may have thought I took pleasure in resisting the
     president's budget, or that I enjoyed the limelight. Nothing
     could be further from the truth. I had serious, substantive
     reservations about that budget, and the decisions it sets in
     place for today and the future.

     Looking ahead, I can see more and more instances where I
     will disagree with the President on very fundamental
     issues: the issues of choice, the direction of the judiciary,
     tax and spending decisions, missile defense, energy and
     the environment, and a host of other issues, large and
     small.

     The largest for me is education. I come from the state of
     Justin Smith Morrill, a U.S. Senator who gave America the
     land grant college system. His Republican Party stood for
     opportunity for all, for opening the doors of public school
     education to every American child. Now, for some,
     success seems to be measured by the number of students
     moved out of public schools.

     In order to best represent my state of Vermont, my own
     conscience, and the principles I have stood for my whole
     life, I will leave the Republican Party and become an
     Independent. Control of the Senate will soon be changed
     by my decision. I will make this change and will caucus with
     the Democrats for organizational purposes, once the
     conference report on the tax bill is sent to the President.

     My colleagues, many of them my friends for years, may find
     it difficult in their hearts to befriend me any longer. Many of
     my supporters will be disappointed, and some of my
     staffers will see their lives upended. I regret this very much.
     Having made my decision, the weight that has been lifted
     from my shoulders now hangs on my heart.

     But I was not elected to this office to be something that I am
     not. This comes as no surprise to Vermonters, because
     independence is the Vermont way. My friends back home
     have supported and encouraged my independence even
     when they did not agree with my decisions. I appreciate
     the support they have shown when they have agreed with
     me, and their patience when they have not. I will ask for that
     support and patience again, which I understand will be
     difficult for a number of my friends.

     I have informed President Bush, Vice President Cheney,
     and Senator Lott of my decision. They are good people
     with whom I disagree. They have been fair and decent to
     me. I have also informed Senator Daschle of my decision.
     Three of these four men disagreed with my decision, but I
     hope each understood my reasons. And it is entirely
     possible that the fourth may well have second thoughts
     down the road.

     I have changed my party label, but I have not changed my
     beliefs. Indeed, my decision is about affirming the
     principles that have shaped my career. I hope the people
     of Vermont will understand it. I hope, in time, that my
     colleagues will as well. I am confident that it is the right
     decision.
     http://www.senate.gov/~jeffords/

Jeffords Dumps GOP
Senator formally announces plan to ditch Republican
party and become an independent; departure will tip
Senate balance to favor Democrats
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,20197,00.html

WHAT ABOUT 'OATH OF OFFICE' TO REPRESENT THE PEOPLE THAT VOTED?
IS THIS NOT A CRIME?
=======================================================================
POST YOUR COMMITS TO APFN MESSAGE BOARD:
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=1904

Senators of the 107th Congress
http://www.senate.gov/senators/index.cf

The 545 People Responsible For All of America's Woes
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/woes.htm

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to