-Caveat Lector-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/03/03/29_odor.html
A Familiar Odor in the Air: The Vietnam Connection
March 29, 2003
By Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers
Is it just me or is there a smell of Vietnam in the desert air? Once again, in
its haste to get its war on, the U.S. has gone into a foreign land, ignorant
of its culture, believing that its technological might would lead to a swift
victory, forgetting the force of nationalism when a people believe
themselves to be invaded.
And the U.S. generals and politicians in charge pretend that all is going
swimmingly and that the war willl be over just as soon as the "coalition"
forces get into downtown Baghdad and punish the enemy Big Time.
Does any of this sound familiar? How do you spell Q-U-A-G-M-I-R-E?
As we now know, the generals and policy advisors warned successive U.S.
presidents not to get involved in Vietnam (see Daniel Ellsberg's book,
Secrets), but each President dismissed those inside experts and went
ahead anyway, the result of which was the expension of our blood and
treasure - and our sense of ourselves as a moral nation - in an unwinnable
war.
We know that the top echelons of our current military early on warned
the Bush politicos and Mr. Bush himself not to launch this war on Iraq,
absent an overt provocation and without a huge international coalition on
board; the brass were warned by Rumsfeld to get in line with Bush policy
or get another job. They got in line.
The policy behind the Iraq war comes mainly from chickenhawks - i.e.,
armchair soldiers who made sure they didn't have to serve in Vietnam or
any other wars. These Project for the New American Century ideologues
were certain that the Iraqis would welcome the U.S. soldiers as liberators,
they knew how weak Saddam's regime was, they were sure they could roll
the members of the U.N. Security Council into backing their fait accompli
war, they knew Turkey would accept the bribe and come around, they
knew everything. Infallible.
Bush, not having any ideas of his own, was a prime candidate for
swallowing such malarky and turning it into doctrine. And so, against the
advice of everyone who should count in such things - former President
Bush and his top security advisors; his own military brass; the Pope and
other world religious leaders; his European allies; the Arab World, virtually
unanimously; ten million citizens of various countries who took to the
streets to denounce the planned invasion, and so on - Bush launched a
"pre-emptive" war on Iraq, absent any provocation.
He wouldn't need as big an invading force as many military leaders told him
might come in handy. When the Iraqis see our might, and feel our bombs,
are properly shocked and awed by our greatness, it'll all be over before
you can say "Halliburton contract." So went the Bush mantra, and in the
early days, Rumsfeld laid on the "inevitability" line big time. It's all but over,
they'll see it momentarily and then we will have won, we will have
"liberated" the Iraqi people.
Hasn't worked out that way. The Iraqis will take U.S. food packages and
water, and then denounce America as an infidel invader, the "Satan" that's
bombing their villages and cities, killing their citizens, trying to humiliate
them in the world's eyes.
Why did we expect otherwise? The Bush Administration - which wears
blinders, just like successive administrations with regard to Vietnam, so
that it will see only what it wants to see - accepted everything the Iraqi
opposition-in-exile told them about what would happen once U.S. troops
set foot on Iraqi soil. The people would rise up, throw off the Saddam
shackles and place flowers at the feet of their American saviors.
It's at least conceivable that something like that could have happened had
the U.S. been lucky with its opening-night overture bombing and
decapitated the entire Iraqi military/political leadership in one fell swoop.
But without an instantaneous success, the U.S. found itself fighting in
Saddam's war-scenario rather than being fully able to carry out its own.
And now the "coalition" (mainly the U.S. and U.K., plus whatever others
could be badgered and bullied and bribed into lending their names but no
troops) is getting ready to enter Baghdad, for the jolly good fun of house-
by-house, street-by-street fighting in territory known exclusively by their
enemy.
It's going to be a turkey shoot for the Iraqis as they ambush and boobytrap
and lead the U.S. troops down one blind alley after another, for months,
perhaps for years. And you know what the response will be from the
Superpower: more bombing from the air in an urban environment, civilian
casualties galore, more sympathy for the Iraqis from the Arab world, less
patience with the U.S. around the globe, a vision of the U.S. as a giant
bully who just wants to beat up someone to demonstrate his authority.
Whenever things looked dark in Vietnam, the military would ask for another
100,000 troops. That'll make us invulnerable, that'll take care of those
gooks. We'll up the ante. More B-52 bombings, more napalm, more infantry,
the boys'll be home by Christmas.
Things are looking poorly along the road to Baghdad, so the call already is
out: Another 100,000 troops already are on their way to Iraq. (And you can
bet your bottom dollar that there are brass in the Pentagon thinking, but
not yet saying: "We told you so, you dumb civilian a-holes!")
Things have moved so quickly. The antiwar marches were drawing millions
in this country and around the globe, and the fricking war hadn't even
started yet! And now that the war is officially on, conservative Foreign
Service Officers are resigning, conservative Republican Party officials are
resigning, Australian pilots are refusing their bomb-run orders - all
because, in good conscience, they can't condone what their government
is asking them to do in this illegal and immoral war. That development took
years and years to happen in Vietnam. And we're just in the opening weeks
of this war.
Will Bush&Co. realize the truths they should have realized before they
launched their invasion, and pack it in? Oh, terribly sorry, we made a bad
mistake; rather than waste more of our precious youth and treasure on
this sorry mess, we're pulling out and going back to the United Nations for
direction. Yeah, sure. It would take a government of great moral courage
to do something like that - and, in case you haven't noticed, that's not
who's in charge these days.
No, too much is riding on this gigantic gamble for PNAC and the rest of
Bush&Co. In order to carry out its vision for the region, and the world -
i.e., regional and world dominance, control of natural resources, being
able to threaten and put down any would-be competitors (be they nation-
states or international organizations) - Iraq has to fall. No ifs, ands or buts.
These guys will bankrupt the U.S. before they abandon their grandiose
scheme, will send more and more young men and women to their deaths
to get what they want. They want the world and they want it NOW, and
nothing you or I say will deter them from their self- appointed rounds. God
has annointed them, you see, and the geopolitical situation offers the
opportunity - no other Superpower around to stop them - so get out of
our way, damn it.
The idea that they can be defeated by non-superpowers - like the world's
citizens boycotting American goods, by millions of anti-war demonstrators
leaning on their governments abroad to combat U.S. imperial ambitions,
the beginning rumbles for impeachment, even (possibly) the United Nations
stepping in to force their hand - simply hasn't entered their craniums. Yet.
But they'd better start thinking such thoughts, because their crass
arrogance, bullyboy behavior, and desperate flailing around militarily have
energized the world against them, and are starting to make inroads even
into the fearful American polity, who are starting to wonder whether
these are the best leaders for our already scary times. (There are rumors
circulating that the Bush Administration is examining options to call off the
2004 elections, to take care of that possibility outright. And, if not, to
ensure that most of us vote by computer touch-screens, with no paper
trail with which to double-check the results.)
In the meantime, prepare yourself for more bad news out of Iraq. The boys
won't be home anytime soon - even, or especially, if there's a "victory."
The PNAC scenario, you see, calls for the U.S. to establish a major military
base in Iraq, from which the next phase of the operation to control the
Middle East region ("benevolently," of course) will be run. Get ready to
rumble.
Bernard Weiner, Ph.D. in government & international relations, has taught
at various universities, was a writer/editor with the San Francisco
Chronicle for 19 years, and currently co-edits The Crisis Papers.
© Democratic Underground, LLC
Forwarded for your information. The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
