-Caveat Lector- ----Original Message----- From: Lara Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, April 07, 1999 11:05 PM Subject: Taking a Crack at the CIA [Great Article!!] http://www.lawnewsnet.com/stories/A536-1999Apr6.html Taking a Crack at the CIA [Image] Suit seeks link between agency and crack epidemic [Image] [Image] [Image] Kelly Flaherty The Recorder/Cal Law April 7, 1999 [Image] [Image] [Image] Oakland, Calif. attorneys William Simpich Jr. and Katya Komisaruk have taken on their share of long-shot cases and won. But their most recent -- a federal class action that would hold the Central Intelligence Agency and the Department of Justice liable for the crack cocaine epidemic of the 1980s -- makes their previous battles look easy. Simpich and Komisaruk don't seem worried by the suggestion that they are tilting at windmills. "People said that about the tobacco litigation -- they said no one can sue Philip Morris," Simpich says. But then damning private industry documents were made public, he says, "and there was no stopping those suits. I think the same thing can happen here." The attorneys -- who are gearing up to file related tort claims -- compare their cause to the civil rights struggles of the 1960s. But others doubt that the suit will make it past the starting gate. "I applaud their effort, but it would appear that they have an uphill battle," says San Francisco attorney Karen Snell, whose practice includes challenging federal agencies. She says the suit will inevitably come up against CIA claims of immunity in areas that involve national security. But Komisaruk insists the CIA is on shaky ground. Unlike the tobacco litigants who had to dig for secret industry documents, she says, the plaintiffs in this case already have their smoking gun: A previously secret agreement forged with the Justice Department in 1982 that allowed the CIA to remain quiet about drug smuggling by sources connected to the Nicaraguan Contras. In particular, the complaint focuses on a report released last fall by CIA Inspector General Frederick Hitz that brought the agreement to light and showed the agency did little or nothing to respond to allegations of drug trafficking by the Contra rebels. Plaintiffs say the agreement violates a federal law that requires any department or agency of the executive branch to report any possible criminal activity by officers and employees of the government. A spokeswoman for the CIA says the agency does not comment on pending litigation. But shortly after the publication of the Inspector General's report last fall, the agency released a statement saying there is no evidence that the CIA or its employees "conspired with, or assisted, Contra-related organizations or individuals in drug trafficking." NOT DOING ITS PART But the plaintiffs say the CIA is liable regardless of whether it assisted the Contras. They are asking for a declaration from the CIA admitting that the secret agreement with the Justice Department was illegal and an order requiring the agency to report any possible drug crimes to the DOJ. They are also demanding money damages for "injuries suffered by the community as a whole, such as: lack of safety, overburdened social services, loss of local businesses and damages to the tax base." Although the plaintiffs' attorneys have yet to put a price tag on damages or to decide how the proceeds would be divided, Komisaruk says they plan to rally support in inner city communities in Oakland and Los Angeles through churches, unions and schools. "It will be like the voter registration drives in the South but more so," she says. Lyons v. CIA, 99-1205, has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, a former police officer, state and federal prosecutor who was appointed to the bench by President Bush. An identical suit has been filed by plaintiffs in Los Angeles. The name plaintiffs in Lyons are two elderly Oakland residents, Rosemary Lyons and Olivia Woods, who say crack cocaine has degraded their neighborhoods and torn apart their families. "The CIA, who I trust to be watchdogs, didn't do their part in reporting how the drugs were coming in [to the country]," says Woods, 71, who has raised two of her grandchildren since her son died of a crack overdose and her daughter-in-law succumbed to a serious addiction. She says the crack epidemic could have been avoided or at least curbed if the CIA had shared its information with local law enforcement agencies. She hopes the suit will bring justice and money to rebuild the community. The Inspector General's report at the root of the case was released in 1998 in the wake of controversy that followed a series of stories in 1996 by reporter Gary Webb in the San Jose Mercury News on the Contra-cocaine connection. Webb's broad thesis, that the CIA encouraged and facilitated the drug trafficking as a way to funnel money to the Contras, prompted an overwhelmingly skeptical reaction. The New York Times and other newspapers questioned his reporting in a series of unusual attacks on another paper. Meanwhile, the CIA issued its own report refuting Webb's assertions. However, African-American political leaders such as Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Los Angeles, have used the report to question government activities. Because of the controversy, the plaintiffs have been careful to stay away from allegations that the CIA itself was peddling drugs or had targeted the black community for destruction. "We said exactly that in our lawsuit so as not to be hung on the same cross as Gary Webb," Komisaruk says. A DIFFERENT LEAGUE Both Simpich and Komisaruk are experienced with handling politically charged cases in the past. They successfully defended operators of illegal needle-exchange programs that provide clean syringes to drug users in Berkeley and Oakland. Komisaruk recently defended one of three protestors arrested for throwing pies in Mayor Willie Brown's face. The pie throwers, members of the so-called Biotic Baking Brigade, were convicted of battery but acquitted of a more serious charge of assault on a public official in January. Simpich has made a name for himself with suits that challenge what he considers Draconian drug laws. Last year he helped elderly Oakland residents win a battle before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who ruled the residents could not be evicted because their relatives or visitors had been arrested for drug possession outside the building. More recently he filed a suit, along with Kenneth Frucht, another co-counsel in the CIA case, that would force state Attorney General Bill Lockyer to take action against California district attorneys who disregard Proposition 215 and prosecute medical marijuana cases. Still, both attorneys admit that taking on the CIA and Janet Reno puts them in a different league altogether. But Simpich says plaintiffs have had success against the CIA in the past. For example, a 1988 suit that accused the CIA of conducting mind control experiments on unsuspecting Canadian citizens in the early 1950s settled in favor of the plaintiffs for $750,000. Others who have taken on the CIA have found themselves in hot water. A U.S. district judge in Miami slapped the Christic Institute -- a nonprofit, legal advocacy group -- and two journalists with $1.1 million in costs and legal fees after dismissing a 1986 suit. That case accused individual U.S. officials, including Richard Secord and John Singlaub, of joining in a Contra-led assassination plot that resulted in a deadly bombing in Nicaragua. As for the expected immunity defense in Lyons, Simpich says the CIA won't be able to hide behind it if the plaintiffs can show that officials acted deliberately or with reckless indifference to the civil rights of U.S. citizens. He claims that won't be difficult to prove considering that the CIA report acknowledges the agency's disregard of its duty to protect citizens from drug trafficking. Komisaruk adds that the case will survive because it stands on congressional testimony and government documents. "The CIA itself has already admitted fault," she says. "Now we want to go to court and say what the CIA has to do to make it better." Amandla Awethu Power to the People http://www.amandla.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] +------------------------------------------------------+ | I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for | | justice, no matter who it is for or against. I'm a | | human being first and foremost, and as such I am for | | whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole. | +------------------- Malcolm X. -----------------------+ |The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor, | | is the mind of the oppressed | +-------------------- Steve Biko-----------------------+ | You must be the change you wish to see in the world | +----------------- Mahatma Gandhi ---------------------+ | There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power | | government has is the power to crack down on | | criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, | | one makes them. One declares so many things to be | | a crime that it becomes impossible for men to | | live without breaking laws. | +--------------------- Ayn Rand -----------------------+ DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
