-Caveat Lector-

washingtonpost.com
Tax-and-Spend Republicans?
Budget Crunches in Nevada, New Mexio Challenge Democratic, GOP Stereotypes

By T. R. Reid
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 20, 2003; Page A04

CARSON CITY, Nev. -- Gov. Kenny Guinn's biography reads like an archetypal
Republican profile: A millionaire banker and corporate CEO, he got into
politics "to bring private sector discipline to the business of governance."
And yet this solid Republican conservative is calling for a billion dollars
in new state taxes this year "so that government can provide the services
people deserve."

In nearby New Mexico, Gov. Bill Richardson's résumé is the classic career
pattern of a modern-day Democratic politician: Hispanic activist,
congressman, member of Bill Clinton's Cabinet. And yet this reliably liberal
Democrat has pushed through a package of Bush-style tax cuts this year
because "reducing taxes puts us on the road to economic growth."

As the tale of these two states suggest, governors desperate to balance
their budgets in sour economic times are sometimes abandoning traditional
philosophies and turning political orthodoxies on their ear.

Tax revenue is declining and Washington is focused on war and offering
little help. Across the nation, states are laying off workers, releasing
prison inmates, cutting Medicaid benefits, delaying paydays, even closing
schools one day a week, according to the National Conference of State
Legislatures. President Bush predicts his proposed federal tax cuts will
stimulate the economy, but the stimulus will be offset by proposed tax
increases in half the states, together with big hikes in tuition, tolls and
other fees.

With the federal government projecting the largest deficit ever in the
coming fiscal year, states have little hope for financial assistance from
Washington. "There were a lot of promises," says John P. Comeaux, Nevada's
director of administration. "There was supposed to be economic stimulus,
homeland security funds, da da da da. But we haven't seen a dime."

The diversity in approaches to the fiscal crisis is evident in the
contrasting strategies adopted by Nevada and New Mexico, western states that
both have snow-capped mountains, vast brown deserts, and battered economies.

Nevada has been the fastest-growing state in the union for several decades;
the population, 2.2 million, is 50 percent bigger than it was 10 years ago.
It has been apparent for years, says Guinn, that the traditional revenue
source, casino gambling -- the business known euphemistically here as
"gaming" -- can no longer produce enough money to sustain state programs.

In his first four-year term, the 66-year-old governor said: "I did
everything a good Republican is supposed to do. We privatized. We cut 1,300
government jobs. We spent almost all of our rainy day fund."

But after his easy reelection last year, the term-limited governor changed
directions for his last term. "I looked at my budget for this year," Guinn
explains, "and I said, 'I'm just not going to cut anymore.' Some people say
that makes me a bad Republican. Well, I would be a worse Republican, and a
worse grandfather, and a worse citizen, if I didn't find enough money to
educate our children and fund our Medicaid program and provide decent
prenatal care."

Accordingly, Guinn has asked his legislature to approve the biggest tax
increase in Nevada's history. The package includes higher taxes on
cigarettes, liquor and some slot machines. But the real shocker -- in a
state that has always promoted its aversion to business taxes -- is a new
levy on corporate "receipts"; it was styled that way to get around the state
constitution's ban on "income" taxes.

The plan has sparked a furious anti-Guinn response in the letters columns,
on talk shows, from the Chamber of Commerce and much of the Republican
Party. But politicians and pundits say most of the billion-dollar tax
package will probably get through the Republican-controlled state Senate and
Democratic-controlled House, because the state's budget shortfall is
obvious, and nobody has proposed an alternative.

Still, the governor's program goes down hard with much of his own party.
"This billion-dollar baby is all about expanding government's mandate," says
Assemblyman Bob Beers, a Las Vegas Republican. "I thought growing the
government and raising taxes was something Democrats are supposed to do."

If that's what Democrats are supposed to do, the message has clearly not
gotten through to Bill Richardson, the 55-year-old political veteran who
went home to Santa Fe at the end of the Clinton administration and breezed
to victory in the gubernatorial election last fall.

New Mexico, Richardson said: "had the highest state income tax in the
region, but we ranked lowest in wages, in manufacturing, in attracting new
industry. And I ran for election on a platform to bring good jobs into this
state."

To do that, Richardson's plan reduces New Mexico's income tax rate by 40
percent, from the current 8.2 percent to 4.9 percent by 2008. It cuts the
state capital gains tax in half, to 10 percent. It offers tax credits to
companies opening new facilities in the state.

Richardson agrees that his plan sounds "sort of like" Bush's tax-cutting
agenda. And he argues that Democrats nationwide should consider tax-cutting
a viable strategy. "We need to stop talking about class warfare and the
distribution of wealth," he said. "We need to start talking about economic
growth," and "reducing taxes puts us on the road to economic growth."

But the Democrat has firmly rejected complaints at home that he's following
the president's example.

"This is not a trickle-down plan to hand out money to the rich," he said.
"I'm doing this to make our state more competitive. The idea is, you can
attract executives to set up shop in New Mexico if you can tell them their
taxes will be lower here."

Still, Richardson said he is concerned about "keeping my Democratic
credentials." Accordingly, the new corporate tax incentives are available
only to companies that pay more than the prevailing wage. "I'm looking out
for labor, and the Demos are happy with that."

Richardson has faced less flak in Santa Fe than Guinn is getting in Carson
City, in part because he detailed his tax-cutting plan during the election
campaign last fall. Indeed, the Richardson tax program passed the Democratic
legislature last month without a dissenting vote.

Guinn's plan is facing a tougher reception, because the size and scope of
the tax increases he set out in his State of the State address surprised the
political community. During his reelection campaign last year, Guinn
concedes: "I told the voters that we needed to do something about the budget
shortfall. But I didn't tell them exactly what."

"I think Governor Guinn's biggest problem," said Pete Ernaut, a Carson City
lobbyist and former Guinn aide, "is that he sounded so enthusiastic about
raising more money for government. Republicans are supposed to apologize
when they raise taxes. But the governor just said, 'Our state is in a
desperate economic bind, and that changes the rules, even for Republicans.'
"

© 2003 The Washington Post Company

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to