-Caveat Lector- http://www.truthout.com/02.13F.Real.War.htm Amen to this! -- Bill
WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War! The Real Undeclared War by Jennifer Van Bergen t r u t h o u t | February 12, 2002 We have been fighting, as we all know, an undeclared war against terrorists in Afghanistan. Maybe that war is over, maybe not. But there is another officially undeclared war going on. That is the war between truth and lies. A war of principles. I'm getting tired of this. So are many other citizens. I'm tired of frozen smiles, averted eyes, eternal stalling and brazenly arrogant lies. I'm tired of people who pat themselves on the back for being more clever and more secretive about it than the next guy. I'm tired of hearing the canned phrases: I'm just doing my job. It's our policy. I didn't know anything. I'm not the one responsible. My answer to that is "That's what the Nazis said." What is amazing about this epidemic avoidance of responsibility is that everyone knows it and no one thinks its unusual. "That's the way politicians are!" they say, shrugging their shoulders. That's the way government is. That's the way lawyers are. That's the way business is. That's the way people are. OR, I hear people say that somehow THIS dishonesty is better than THAT dishonesty. "Well, at least he didn't say ......." Fill in the blanks. Or I hear that it's okay to be dishonest when you are lying for your country. Huh? Didn't anyone tell these guys it's wrong to lie? There's a place for circumspection, but the coverup habit seems to be a carryover from Cold War spy days, and our acceptance of it is nearly blind. Well, it may seem patriotic to some people to plunder their neighbors and the environment for the betterment of big business -- I'm not just talking about Enron here; I'm talking about our Administration -- but I know people who are expatriating because they are so disillusioned and disgusted with what is going on. There is indeed a war going on. A war against terrorism. But the terrorism is not only coming from Muslim extremists; it's coming from our own government. A psychological form of terrorism is being perpetrated, not just against foreign enemies or immigrants, but against average american citizens. Or perhaps subversion is a better term for it. The subversion of an open society, of open and reasoned discussion and debate, of cross-cultural input and majority rule. Remember the First Amendment protest zones? No one with signs protesting Bush was allowed within, what was it, a mile? two miles? of Bush. (It was deemed a national security threat.) Remember the stay of the recount? (Was a recount deemed a threat to national security, too?) This subversion is being effected right beneath our eyes while our thoughts are engaged in fighting, uh, well, terrorism. It's a well-known scam actually. Let me tell you a little anecdote to illustrate: once I went into a famous old pharmacy in Manhattan to buy a lipstick. I put a bag of mine (not my handbag) on a stool and was looking at lipsticks a few feet away when both the clerk and the guard started chastising me never, NEVER to do that, never to leave my bag even for an instant; it could be stolen. I thanked them, bought my lipstick and went home. When I got home, I looked at the receipt and saw I had been charged $7.00 plus tax for the lipstick. This is way beyond what I would ever pay for lipstick. Yes, there had been a theft, but not by someone looking to have the advantage of my bag. The theft was by the pharmacy, the very people who had cautioned me to be careful. What happened here is simple: my attention was drawn away from the actual imminent danger (theft of my money by the store) to an imagined danger (theft of my bag by a passerby). Sure, I could've asked the price of the lipstick before I bought it or looked at the register display when I paid, but even though my bag was now at my side, I was not able to pay attention because I was still distracted by the thought of what could have happened to my bag. Mind you, I'm not suggesting that the pharmacy personnel did this to me on purpose, or, worse, that they had a policy of doing this to customers. The point is that when your attention is directed to one danger, you are less likely to see another, more imminent and obvious danger. Some people do know how to scam others this way, and have no qualms about doing so. In fact, it is a matter of pride to many cutthroat businesspersons to pull tricks like this. The practice is not limited to petty criminals; it is almost the definition of white collar crime. These are people who capitalize on the gray areas of law. At one time, bank, wire, and securities fraud were gray areas. No laws covered these crimes until the 1930s. Furthermore, a background of greed and intolerance is always good justification for taking advantage of one's neighbors. The idea is we want what we want and we think it is fine to take what we want, if we can. Those are the rules of corporate government. Okay, now back to the present undeclared war. After September 11th, Congress and the President decided to declare war (without an official declaration, of course) on al-Qaida. Since then, americans have witnessed (if we were only looking) more erosion of democratic principles than ever before in american history. Notice that I say "democratic principles." The Constitution itself has not yet been overthrown. The Bush Administration knows the difference. Principles, vague things that they are, are easier to overturn than laws. People have a hard time hanging onto principles. The ideas of free speech, freedom of religion, separation of church and state, separation of powers, governmental accountability, the rights to vote, to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, to not be compelled to testify against oneself, to due process of law, and so on -- to most people, these are just so much smoke and mirrors. Most people care only about what they can see in their own back yard. But principles are important and once they are ignored, forgotten, or overridden, once people learn to stop thinking and questioning and demanding their rights, it takes just a flick of the wrist to overturn the laws. As I say, Bush knows this. There is not a move he or his people have made that has breached this distinction. Here, look at this one: under the pretext of equal protection, millions of votes in the last election were thrown out. Does it make any sense? No. In order to protect every person's right to vote, you throw half their votes out? I don't think so. Did the Supreme Court opinion breach a constitutional principle? Yes. It certainly broke with all its own prior precedent, including that dictated by the very Justices who made this decision. In other words, equal protection was never given like this when it involved a black person's rights. Only if you're Bush. The Justices knew this. They even said that their decision applied only to this case and none other. In terms of the principle of equal protection, clearly it no longer means anything. It's gone. It never existed. Only if you're one of the boys. But, the law? Did Bush's street-cleaners, the Supreme Court, violate or overturn the law? Nope. At least not nominally We still purportedly have the constitutional right of equal proection. But, buried in the Supreme Court's opinion which put Bush into office is Rehnquist's quiet statement that there is no federal right to vote. Huh? Did you catch that? By Rehnquist's reasoning, the Justice's 5-4 decision in favor of Bush's equal protection claim was a decision in favor of a nonexistent right! That is one example of overturning a principle in potential preparation for overturning a law (which happens to be a constitutional law). Get americans used to the idea that only the Magic Nine (similar, I guess, to Ocean's 11) can say what rights we have, and eventually we'll accept that they can take those rights away, too. What next? Well, next was Energy Policy for the big boys and Enron. Some securities laws were broken at Enron, for sure, but Bush and Cheney had nothing to do with that. Then there was the tax cut. That was to stimulate the economy, right? Lots of environmental protection laws rescinded or thrown out. To increase oil production. Then September 11th and war on al-Qaida, bombing Afghanistan. To protect our nation. Do you wonder at the coincidences between Bush policies and some pretty big disasters? Bush's hawkish attitude preceded the terrorist attack. His promotion of energy deregulation preceded Enron's collapse. Either these events were the result of some huge astrological convergences, some really unusual degree of chance, tremendous stupidity, or we are being bamboozled. Or maybe all of the above. I do not happen to think Bush or his buddies are stupid. They simply know how to capitalize on the gray areas. In any event, it's a good idea for americans to keep in mind how the scam works and to remember to keep paying attention to what is important. So, what IS important? You know, a few hundred years ago, everyone read about law. Everyone read Tom Paine's "Common Sense" and "The Rights of Man." Everyone read what are now known largely to historians as "The Federalist Papers," written mostly by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, which set forth the framework of and reasons for the democratic/republican form of government. In a time when the only means of transportation was by horse or sailing ship, when news was spread largely by word of mouth, in a country of sparsely populated wilderness dotted with a few cities here and there, which contained fewer people than you would find in a small township nowadays, hundreds of thousands of people read these books. Man, woman, and child In 1809, remembering the american war for independence, a woman wrote her sister: "What sacrifice would not an American .. at the earliest age have made for so desirable an end [as liberty] -- young as I was (twelve years old when the war began) the word Liberty continually sounding in my ears seemed to convey an idea of everything that was desirable on earth - true that in attaining it, I was to see every present comfort abandoned - " Remember, that war was fought over taxes. Taxation without representation. Taxation by the British Parliament of the american colonists, who were not represented in Parliament. So, the people of this country, who fought a war to obtain the right not to be taxed without being represented in Parliament, now, according to the Supreme Court, don't have the right to have their votes counted, and, according to Chief Justice Rehnquist, no longer even have the right to vote. The people who fought for the right to form their own government independent of the mother country, now are told they don't have the right to know what their president or vice-president are doing. We are told that we only have the right to free speech in specially marked zones. We are told to look away, look for terrorists elsewhere, or even in our midsts, but to ignore what our own government is doing. We are told to abandon our democratic principles, while citing empty laws. Are we still Americans? I wonder. Or have we been tricked out of remembering our principles? Is not the fight for these principles the real undeclared war? Jennifer Van Bergen is t r u t h o u t Managing Editor and a contributing writer. *COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ] Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists! Write to same address to be off lists! <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om