-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.eionews.com/psyops/plot_within_a_plot_part1.htm
Click Here: <A
HREF="http://www.eionews.com/psyops/plot_within_a_plot_part1.htm";>
http://www.eionews.com/…_within_a_plot_part1.htm</A>
-----

PsyOp: Pych-war operation staged to alter perceptions more
HomepageLOADING. . .graphics...

PART I      PART II coming...       PART III
The Split Second Error      Bombs in the WTC
          The Plot within a Plot....within a plot....within a
plot........within a plot......


    THE SPLIT-SECOND ERROR
...EXPOSING THE WTC BOMB PLOT...

by Fintan Dunne,
coEditor, PsyOpNews.com
Research Kathy McMahon
18 September 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

VIDEO Windows Mpeg
THE HIJACK PILOT'S
SPLIT SECOND ERROR
14 mins @ 56K








"IT WAS DESIGNED
FOR A PLANE IMPACT"
Aaron Swirski, one of the architects of the World Trade Center, talks
exclusively to Jerusalem Post Radio on the World Trade Center collapse. He
says they designed the towers to withstand something like a plane flying into
the side.
For interview, Media Player
JpRadio item ...Now working.


12th September, 2001

EXPLOSIVES EXPERT SAYS
WTC WAS BOMBED
Towers collapse "too methodical"

CHARGES PLANTED
TO TAKE
DOWN BUILDING



Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and
Technology says the collapse of the twin towers resembled those of controlled
implosions used in planned demolition.

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the
World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings
that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.

A demolition expert, Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials
Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and
the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures.

He said he and Denny Peterson, vice president for administration and finance,
were en route to an office building near the Pentagon to discuss
defense-funded research programs at Tech. Romero told the Albequerque Journal
that he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts.

The detonations could have been caused by a small amount of explosive put in
more than two points in each of the towers, he said. "It could have been a
relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points," Romero
said.

BUILDING COLLAPSE SHOCKS
WORLD TRADE CENTER
ENGINEER, ARCHITECT

"I DESIGNED IT FOR A 707 HIT"
DETROIT, Sept. 11 (UPI) -- Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer,
addressed the problem of terrorism on high-rises at a conference in
Frankfurt, Germany, LAST WEEK (!!!), Chicago engineer Joseph Burns told the
Chicago Tribune. Burns said Robertson told the conference, "I designed it for
a (Boeing)707 to hit it."
UPI REPORT

DETROIT, Sept. 11 (UPI) -- A lead engineer who worked on New York's World
Trade Center Towers expressed shock Tuesday that the 110-story lanmarks in
Lower Manhattan collapsed after each tower was struck by a hijacked passenger
jetliner.
The determined man at the controls of Flight 175 was now less than one minute
from his own demise, and was in that state of heightened alertness that only
approaching death can generate.

Ahead, as he hurtled across New York towards Manhattan Island, he could see
the vast plume of smoke (1). His colleague in Flight 11, approaching from the
opposite direction had already made an almost perfect impact on the North
Tower of the World Trade Center.

On the far side of the tower, concealed from his view, was the gash (2) where
the hijacked airliner had spread its fuel payload over several floors of the
building. Just as the trainers had coached.

But the sight still managed to unnerve him. It was one thing practicing the
approach for countless hours on a computer simulator, but this was real life
-and no mistake could be made. The planners had insisted that the planes must
strike the towers at a banked angle. Otherwise the fire would be confined to
only a couple of floors and would not set the building comprehensively
alight. Without perfect execution, the imperialists would only suffer minor
casualties, he had been told.

What they never told him was that the aircraft impacts were only one half of
the plan. One visible and psychologically terrorizing aspect would be
provided by the suicidal aircraft. But the other half of the plan was unknown
to the two pilots and their accomplices. Bombs had already been planted
inside both towers.

They would be detonated after the planes had struck, to ensure the total
destruction of the buildings and their evidentiary contents. The bombs inside
the towers were strapped to radio-trigger detonators. Other plotters would be
near the scene -monitoring TV coverage to determine the right moment to push
the final buttons. The full PsyOps (psychological-warfare) effect would be
the complete disappearance of these two symbols of US confidence and power.

But if the plane struck at the wrong angle, or even worse -missed altogether,
the whole scheme was in danger. Substantial fires were necessary as a cover
for the subsequent collapse.

The planners had taken every precaution. Their flight approach paths were
calculated to align the two towers as a single target -without a gap between
them. His orders were clear. His target was the South Tower, but if the first
plane struck the wrong tower, he was to switch to the other. In either event,
he must strike at the remaining target with a military precision.

But he didn't. And that's where things began to go wrong.

BANKING ON SUCCESS

A straightforward level approach would have been so much easier. Just line up
the towers in the cockpit window and plow straight in. This banked approach
was much harder to accomplish. Imagine swinging a stone on the end of a
string, aiming to strike a standing beer bottle. Imagine getting only one
try. A fully laden 767 is like an elephant with wings -the apotheosis of
maneuverability.

Now, the pilot was now less than two miles from his target. The screaming
noise of the engines on high power were already causing heads to turn among
the early morning crowds below. But they didn't really understand what was
happening. One eyewitness would later recount that the first plane had tried
to to veer off the tower, but hit it nevertheless. That witness had mistaken
the intent of the final course correction.

For no matter how well executed the approach, it would be necessary to make
one last seconds adjustment to get right on target. In the final five
seconds, the tower would still be half a mile away. That's when the
collective million hours of preparation would telescope into seconds and
determine the success or failure of the mission.

Photo 3


Photo 4


Photo 5


Photo 6 And it wasn't going well. As the tower rushed to fill the view in the
cockpit window (3), the pilot realized that he was going too fast and wide of
the target to boot. He would miss to the right. Instead of a minor tilt of
the controls, he would have to lean the aircraft hard left -NOW! (4)

As the airliner tilted acutely to the left (5), the air under the wings began
to leak away -depriving the craft of vital lift, even as the extra
centrifugal force generated by the turn meant that he needed more lift -not
less. The maneuver was only partly successful. Despite the course correction,
the plane still drifted to the right.

In that last instant (6), he never really had time to consider his own death.
The training and his death-moment concentration focussed him so intently on
the task. With a grinding crash the side of the building gave way, as Flight
175 struck near the corner of the tower -too far to the right (7).

The howl of metal and concrete impacting each other was overlaid with the
crack of plate glass shattering. The concrete floors of the building cut
through the plane like a egg passed through an egg slicer. The metal in it's
wings offered little resistance. In an instant, the plane had disappeared
into the tower like a bird returning to it's nest.

But it was no longer an aircraft. It's separated parts careered across the
floors of the South Tower. It was no longer obeying the laws of aerodynamics.
It was subject to the dictates of the angular momentum caused by the banked
approach -and that last moment course correction.

That's when things began to go even more wrong for the cynical perpetrators
of the mass death that was now being inflicted on those in the shattered
airliner's path.



Photo 8


Photo 9

THE ARC OF FAILURE

Earlier, the North Tower impact site had been right in the center of the
tower (2). The entire fuel load and flotsam was dumped deep inside and
remained in the building -where it exploded (8)(fig 1 below).

But now as Flight 175 disappeared inside the South Tower, it burst like a
paper bag full of water. The thousands of pounds of jet fuel were liberated
to follow a path dictated by the momentum of what had once been an aircraft.

A wash of jet fuel and airplane parts tore through the interior of the
building at hundreds of miles an hour; sweeping everything before it and just
starting to ignite as it rushed along. But it didn't take the same course as
had aircraft debris inside the North Tower, eighteen minutes before. By
contrast, the majority of the fuel and debris from the second plane smashed
out of the building and exploded OUTSIDE in the open air over the street
(9)(fig 2 below).

The plane's approach was an arc of a great circle -one that had tightened
even further with that final twitch on the controls. Imagine again a paper
bag of water spun on the end of a string. If the paper bag bursts, the water
inside will head off at a tangent to the original arc.

FIGURE 1


FIGURE 2
In the same fashion, the fuel now tried to take a course to the right of the
original flight path. The aircraft had impacted near the corner of the
building. Within fractions of a second the already igniting fuel had raced
diagonally across the corner to burst out into the open air again, on the
adjacent side of the Second Tower. Photos even show a smoking engine which
shot out as it had not even been slowed by the building interior (10).

This air explosion provided a stunning pyrotechnic spectacle witnessed by
countless millions, but it was an operational disaster. For it left the
thorny question of explaining how the South Tower -which took less than half
the fuel load of it's North Tower twin -was the first of the two to
collapse.(See Fig 1&2)


THE WRONG TOWER
FELL FIRST

Even before the second plane hit the South Tower, it's northern counterpart
was already burning strongly, with a great plume of dense black toxic fumes
drifting over a stunned Manhattan. Flight 11 had rocketed deep inside the
building before the fuel ignited. On some floors the fire burned across the
entire width of the building. By 9:45 a.m. the North Tower was fiercely
ablaze -not just on the floors that took the impact, but all the way to the
top of the building (10).

The towers sprinkler fire extinguisher system were bolstered by automatic
hermetrically sealing doors on every floor to prevent the spread of fire. But
office workers still found themselves stumbling down sometimes darkened and
smoke-filled fire escape stairs.

The giant steel beams used to build the towers had been cast in Japan -no
American steel milll could roll out the massive 'I' beams. The explanation
accepted by the mainstream media pundits for the collapse of both towers is
that these beams softened like warm toffee in the intensity of the fires.

If that were the case, then the North Tower was the obvious candidate to be
the first to collapse. Not only did it have almost a twenty minute head start
on the South Tower conflagration, but the fire extended to the whole area of
many floors. The South Tower fire was smaller and more confined, so that by
10:30 a.m. there was an obvious difference visible to those in the streets
below and the hypnotized TV cameras now trained on the incredible sight.

But can the collapse in any event be really blamed on the fires within? The
great explosions on impact had consumed all the jet fuel in seconds. Now it
was plastic fixtures, cabling and internal partitioning that were burning. Or
smoldering, to be more precise. Only near the great gaping holes -where there
was access to an air supply- did the fire burn with anything like the
intensity required to melt great beams of steel.

Neither had the impacts significantly weakened the structural integrity of
the buildings. Even under normal circumstances these flexible buildings
swayed so much in high winds that seasickness was a noticeable problem among
workers on upper floors. Even on floors near the impact sites, many had felt
only a mild shudder as the aircraft struck.

For the fire to be the cause of the collapse, most of the array of steel
beams that spanned each floor would have to be engulfed in continuous
extremely high temperature fire. This did not happen, nor was it essential to
the plan. If the real intent had been to collapse the towers by means of fire
then the planes would have struck the corners of the towers nearest to each
other. That would have increased the chances of one tower collapsing into the
other.

What actually happened next -before either tower collapsed, was one or more
massive explosions in the other buildings around the towers. Explosions that
sent clouds of masonry dust into the air. The first of many blasts that would
rock the World Trade Center complex.

The explosions marked the final phase.
The curtain was coming down on the morning's gala performance.

And the towers themselves would be next to fall.....

Coming in PART II & III
BOMBS AND WHY THEY WERE PLANTED
READ PART II on PsyOpNews.com shortly...

WHAT NEXT?

A. LEAVE YOUR EMAIL - WE WILL NOTIFY YOU
        WHEN THE NEXT PART IS ONLINE NOTIFY ME.
       (WE GUARANTEE your email used only for this purpose)

B. JOIN THE INVESTIGATION FORUM
World Xrossing FOrum
confidential registration
CLICK GRAPHIC FOR
MORE INFO/READ MESSAGES

C. FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, TIPS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Photo References
1 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/Tower1_b42ndimpact.jpg
2 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/toweroneimpactsite.jpg
3 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/towertwoapproach1.jpg
4 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/towertwoapproach2.jpg
5 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/towertwoapproach3.jpg
6 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/towertwoapproach4.jpg
7 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/tower2impact2.jpg
8 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/tower1impact.jpg
9 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/tower2impact.jpg
10 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/flyingengine.jpg
11 http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/wtc/tower1burning.jpg
Copyright reserved 2001 www.psyopnews.com by
Fintan Dunne, Kathy McMahon and PsyOpNews.com
Reproduce freely on noncommercial / alternative media.
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to