-Caveat Lector-

The War on Drugs Is a War on Liberty
by Scott Wilkerson

William S. Burroughs, the visionary novelist and social critic,
warned that the United States government’s war on drugs was
nothing more than the pretext for establishing in our culture a vast
police apparatus that would forever supercede all our claims to
privacy and property.

Nowhere is this nightmarish scenario more visibly prescient than
in the case of actor Robert Downey Jr.

We all remember the details. The ghastly spectacle of Al Gore’s
Thanksgiving voting piracy was briefly punctuated by news of how
the police stormed into Downey’s Palm Springs hotel room on an
anonymous tip that he was inside with illegal narcotics and a gun,
two things the government would love to keep from all citizens.

Indeed, they found him with cocaine, his drug of choice, and some
other neuro-morphic delights. His mug shot was, of course,
splayed endlessly across the entertainment news, but quickly
coopted by the "important" news segments as evidence of the
increasing dissolution of Hollywood and further proof that white
males are, after all, the real problem in America.

The prosecutor from the District Attorney’s office in his case now
reports that it is very likely a deal between the "authorities"
and Downey’s defense will result in another engagement with a
rehabilitation center instead of prison. Even the system recognizes
that it is absurd to pursue non-violent drug offenders as though they
were rapists or murderers or secessionists.

Strangely, the same Hollywood Left that loves Downey’s oblique
sexuality and his campy wit, that has given him a splendid guest
starring spot on Ally McBoring, that has recognized his comic
genius with a Golden Globe nomination, and has rightly ignored the
"authorities’" hysterical demands for his head did not publicly
condemn the gratuitous invasion of his civil liberties when he was
arrested because someone made a phone call! What in the world
is going on here? Just more confusion because of loose
equivocation on the meaning of words like "laws" and "rights."

The government does seem intuitively to understand that Downey
is more useful to society than some wacked out crack-fiend robber
gangsta from South Central and, therefore, extends to him a
modicum of indulgence.

But rather than re-examine the entire construction of its narcotics
policies, the government merely renegotiates, every ninety days,
the terms of Downey’s case. And the same Hollywood, that
threatens to relocate to Europe every time a conservative dares to
utter a discouraging word about some group’s victimological drivel,
remains silent when one of its own becomes the poster boy for
Federal Usurpation of Individual Liberty because it cannot discern
whether Downey’s "right" to privacy is more or less fundamental
than the state’s "laws" against doing to your own body whatever
you like

Let us celebrate Robert Downey Jr.’s drug habit and his heroic
serial returns to the front lines of this central debate. Burroughs
correctly perceived that the government secretly resents those
liberties it presumes to protect. We are complicit in the delusion
that we are safe as long as we play it straight. But the war on
drugs is a war on the individual. And each of us is a soldier in that
battle.

December 30, 2000

Scott Wilkerson is curator of the Ward Library at the Mises
Institute.


--


...a strict observance of the written laws is
doubtless ONE of the high duties of a good
citizen, but it is not THE HIGHEST. The laws of
necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our
country when in danger, are of higher obligation.
To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence
to written law, would be to lose the law itself,
with life, liberty, property and all those who
are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly
sacrificing the end to the means.
- Thomas Jefferson

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to