-Caveat Lector- COMMENTARY http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe- kluger21feb21,1,3350713.story?coll=la%2Dnews%2Dcomment%2Dopinions Skewered by 'Dean of Mean' Bill O'Reilly -- a Survivor's Tale
By Bruce Kluger Bruce Kluger writes for National Public Radio. February 21, 2003 Earlier this month, Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly found himself on the other side of the firing line for having used the term "wetback" in a discussion about illegal immigrants on his nightly program, "The O'Reilly Factor." Indeed, the uncomfortable position in which this puts the pugnacious host is pure poetic justice: For seven years, the former "Inside Edition" anchor has brought a brand of dyspeptic discourse to the airwaves, lording over a talk show that's as much about his bully tactics as it is about the issues of the day. He has infuriated a litany of guests to the point of distraction: Barney Frank turned beet-red at having his words twisted by O'Reilly; Susan Sarandon sadly shrugged at not being able to speak her mind; smarter public figures flat-out refuse to go on the program. Now saddled with the "wetback" fiasco, it's O'Reilly's turn to feel misunderstood. Like most American viewers of his show, I've often imagined how I would fare in the hot seat, wondering whether I'd have the presence of mind to return O'Reilly's vitriolic volleys with similar agility, or simply crumble beneath his assault. Unlike most viewers, I got my chance. Last month, I wrote an essay in a national newspaper suggesting that O'Reilly's mean-spirited program was just another part of the low-witted showcase for shame now infecting TV -- from "Survival" to "Joe Millionaire." To my astonishment, the day the article appeared, O'Reilly's office called to invite me on the show. Against the advice of those closest to me (my father-in-law: "Are you sure you want to go on?"; my wife: "You're nuts"), I found myself clipping on a microphone 10 hours later and facing off with the viceroy of venom himself. Our ensuing confrontation confirmed something I'd always suspected: O'Reilly has achieved his dubious fame on the backs of his guests (whether he considers those backs to be wet or not). Although he professes to offer a "no-spin zone" of equal-time give and take, in truth the man simply doesn't fight fair. Before the taping began, he glanced at the notes I'd brought with me and glared. "You won't get to read them," he snapped. "This will all go by in a flash." Then, when the cameras blinked on, O'Reilly launched into a 3 1/ 2-minute monologue -- one that I'd repeatedly been told by his handlers not to interrupt -- in which he trashed me, my essay and my "committed liberal" ilk. Consequently, I spent the entirety of our subsequent conversation rebutting his allegations rather than discussing the theme of my article: his bad manners. Before I knew it, O'Reilly was giving me a final whipping in his wrap-up. Then there was the name-calling. In the nine minutes, 58 seconds we were on the air, O'Reilly resorted to playground pejoratives no fewer than 20 times, calling me, among other things, "cheap," "sleazy," "foolish" and "a left-wing journalist out for blood." At one point he even referred to me as "a weasel" -- the name he had reserved for actor George Clooney -- but then took it back. The retraction disappointed me. For a moment, I was flattered to share a slur with a Hollywood stud. Finally, O'Reilly preposterously elevated our on-screen dispute to one of politics. Instead of responding to my charges -- that he's a belligerent blowhard -- he took the absurd position that the newspaper that had originally published my essay did so because it disagreed with his stance on a war with Iraq. Can you say "narcissist"? As much as O'Reilly can be credited with pioneering a new wave of televised rancor, he is no longer alone: His success has spawned a crop of similarly cranky on-air commentators, all of them bent on turning the sanctum of public debate into a noisy free-for-all. Still, the question remains: Did I win my face-off with the dean of mean? Hard to tell. The most I got from my friends was, "You held your own," "You looked good" and "Hey, at least you didn't cry." But I do know I got under the guy's skin. After the taping, when most hosts drop the showbiz artifice and extend a hand to thank their guests, O'Reilly kept his head down, pretending to study his notes. The silence was embarrassing, so I left. As I said, bad manners. If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives. Click here for article licensing and reprint options Copyright 2003 Los Angeles Times Forwarded for your information. The text and intent of the article have to stand on their own merits. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera- tions. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumoured by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sut <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
