http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/08/14/police/index.html

War on protesters
By Jesse Walker

Aug. 14, 2000 | LOS ANGELES -- The Democratic Convention may be taking the national 
stage this week, but those of us who live in Los Angeles have been hearing nervous 
hiccups about it for months. The local authorities, citing fears of riots, have tried, 
unsuccessfully, to confine the demonstrations to a tiny, distant protest zone. They 
have apparently been spying on the protesters' headquarters. And if things get ugly, 
there's been talk of bringing in the National Guard.

Smashed storefronts and flying rocks are bad things. But while the cops and Democrats 
warn of riots, a lot of us have started wondering if we shouldn't be even more afraid 
of repression -- especially in light of what some are saying happened at the 
Republican Convention in Philadelphia.

Marc Brandl of Washington attended those protests as an observer, not a marcher. In 
fact, he hoped to engage the marchers in debate. A devotee of free markets, Brandl had 
little sympathy with the causes represented in the Philadelphia streets. (I'm not wild 
for all of them myself.) There was a lot of vandalism on Tuesday of that week, he 
notes, almost all of it aimed at government property, and some demonstrators attacked 
some cops as well. That Tuesday was also the day most of the arrests were made.

But that doesn't mean the arrests matched the crimes. "Most of the people who 
committed the actual property damage and assaults on police officers, from my 
observation, got away with it," Brandl says. "The people they arrested -- it seemed it 
was random."

It might be worse than that. More than a week after the GOP closed its convention 
doors, ugly reports of police misconduct toward protesters are still trickling in. 
Imprisoned demonstrators have claimed that they were dragged, hogtied, beaten and 
denied medication for serious illnesses. One arrestee reports that a guard grabbed and 
wrenched his penis. The local authorities deny all those reports, and most of the 
allegations not been confirmed -- though some non-protesters caught in the dragnet 
have reported mistreatment as well, strongly suggesting that more than politically 
motivated exaggeration is at play. Human-rights groups are probing the prisoners' 
charges to sort the real crimes from the rumors.

One injustice is undeniable, though. When John Sellers of Berkeley, Calif., chief of 
the Ruckus Society, was arrested for a collection of misdemeanors -- which he denies 
committing -- his bail was set at an astonishing $1 million. Though a second judge 
later reduced the bail to $100,000, it's still hard to square that with the Eighth 
Amendment admonition that "excessive bail shall not be required."

Why was Sellers' surety set so high? He thinks it was to prevent him from protesting 
at the Democratic Convention this week. If that is so, the judges who set his bail are 
guilty of preventative detention, a policy most people associate with backwater 
military fiefdoms, not U.S. cities.

But then, many U.S. cities have been militarizing their police forces recently, with 
the feds' enthusiastic support. The number of paramilitary police units has taken off 
in the last 10 years, as has, naturally, the number of times they've been deployed. 
This has brought about an insidious change in police thinking, outside of the special 
units as well as within them. When you see yourself as part of a military force, you 
stop thinking in terms of individual crimes and start thinking in terms of containment.

The results were on international display last fall, with the Seattle cops' disastrous 
response to the protests at the WTO summit. There, officers were told to control a 
crowd, not to prevent actual wrongdoing. When the protests began, police actually 
ignored lawbreakers -- even when the vandals were at work right across the street -- 
because stopping them would have meant breaking with the day's containment strategy. 
After the mayor decided to get tough, the cops clubbed and arrested people regardless 
of whether they were breaking the law. Individual wrongdoing was beside the point.

Judging from reports of "random" arrests, the Philadelphia police did the same thing.

The containment strategy is not in itself new. I was an undergraduate when the 
University of Michigan won the NCAA basketball championship in 1989, and along with 
hundreds of other students, I ran into the streets to celebrate. The crowd was rowdy 
that night, but most of us were well behaved: There was cheering, hugging, 
hand-slapping, and, at worst, a willingness to climb onto other people's cars. Then a 
few celebrants turned vandalistic, destroying store awnings, breaking windows and in 
at least one case attempting to steal from a store. The would-be looter was captured 
by a security guard, who dragged him to one of the many lawmen lining the streets. 
Here, said the guard, I caught this guy trying to rob a shop. Arrest him.

"I can't," the officer replied, and gestured toward the revelers. "I have to keep this 
crowd under control."

But what was merely a poor priority in Ann Arbor, Mich., was downright poisonous in 
Philadelphia. At the GOP Convention, police weren't afraid that a celebration would 
get out of hand. They were, by their account, afraid of a deliberate conspiracy to 
start a riot. That doesn't call for "crowd control"; it calls for crime control.

Yet even when individuals were targeted -- as with the arrest of Sellers, or the city 
cops' earlier raid on a meeting hall where protesters were preparing puppets -- the 
prevailing attitude was military. Soldiers might conspire to capture an enemy leader 
or to shut down the other side's headquarters. But peace officers are not soldiers, 
and demonstrators are not an enemy army. Under American law, the police have no 
business arresting someone unless he has committed, or is planning to commit, a crime.

The authorities, of course, claim that the arrestees are criminals: that the 
puppet-makers were really making weapons and that Sellers is a political Professor 
Moriarty (the fictional nemesis of Sherlock Holmes). But to judge from what they've 
publicly stated so far, they have little convincing evidence to bolster those charges. 
Until they can do better, we're left with tales of gross abuse and illegal detention, 
and the bitter aftertaste of autocracy.

Meanwhile, the L.A. police have praised the Philadelphia cops' "preemptive" tactics. 
If I were an L.A. shopkeeper, I'd think about hiring a private guard.




*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is 
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving 
the included information for research and educational purposes. Feel free to 
distribute widely but PLEASE acknowledge the source. ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The end is in the means as the tree is in the seed.
- Mahatma Ghandi
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Abraham Lincoln, letter to Wm. F. Elkins  Nov. 21 1864
Arthur Shaw ed.  The Lincoln Encyclopedia  40  {1950}

"We may congratulate ourselves that this cruel war is nearing
it's end.  It has cost a vast amount of treasure and
blood.........It has indeed been a trying hour for the
Republic, but I see in the near future a crisis approaching
that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety
of my country.  As a result of the war, corporations have been
enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will
follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to
prolong it's reign by working on the prejudices of the
people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the
Republic is destroyed.  I feel at this moment more anxiety
for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the
midst of war."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.rwor.org/home-e.htm
http://www.angelfire.com/mi3/empowerment/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to