Re: [CTRL] Washington Post: Bush approval at 91 perc

2001-09-15 Thread thew
://home.earthlink.net/~thew > From: "Samantha L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 01:20:37 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [CTRL] Washington Post: Bush approval at 91 perc &

Re: [CTRL] Washington Post: Bush approval at 91 perc

2001-09-15 Thread RevCOAL
-Caveat Lector- On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Samantha L. wrote: > I guess then that this is "Wag the Dog" in spades. But what's wrong with >spending a little human life when it increases your poll numbers so >drastically? It boggles my mind all the major things they accomplished with >this one alleged

Re: [CTRL] Washington Post: Bush approval at 91 perc

2001-09-14 Thread Samantha L.
-Caveat Lector- I guess then that this is "Wag the Dog" in spades. But what's wrong with spending a little human life when it increases your poll numbers so drastically? It boggles my mind all the major things they accomplished with this one alleged self-attack. And 90% of Americans can't se