-Caveat Lector-

[No such worries Stateside. How nice. ]

http://www.observer.co.uk/cash/story/0,6903,651342,00.html

Retirement's no joke
We don't want to scare you, but...
Britain's pension system is in a mess, leaving millions to face an
unhappy retirement. Maria Scott reports

Sunday February 17, 2002
The Observer

Britain's pension system is in crisis. The closure of blue-chip
company schemes to existing employees is just the latest assault on a
rickety mechanism of Heath Robinson complexity. Today, we launch a
campaign aimed at persuading politicians and industry leaders to
engage in a renewed debate about retirement provision.

There are problems in practically every area of the pension system:

@ The basic state scheme is being reshaped to rely on means testing
and there is to be a new top-up state scheme of mind-boggling
complexity.

@ The Government's stakeholder scheme has failed to attract its target audience

@ Increased longevity is coinciding with shorter working lives

@ Stock market returns are falling just as individuals are being
steered towards investment to provide for retirement

@ Confidence in the private sector has been undermined by the
Equitable Life disaster and by high charges and poor returns

@ Employers are pulling back from high quality pension provision and
in some cases reducing contributions. Abbey National became the
latest to announce last week that it was to close its final salary
scheme to new members

@ The private and state schemes are constantly subjected to change.
One calculation suggests there are now more than 20 different kinds
of private pension schemes

@ Public sector schemes are facing funding crises that will put
council tax bills under pressure.

Until now, much debate about pensions has concentrated on the need
for individuals to save more money for old age. But the sums demanded
will be impossible for many people to achieve unless there are
radical changes in lifestyles - which would curb consumer spending
-or there is a stock market boom of unimaginable ferocity. A pension
fund worth nearly 300000 pounds is now required to buy a 60-year-old
man a pension of about 22,000 a year. This assumes no inflation
proofing, and no pension for a spouse. Including these frills roughly
doubles the cost.

Conventional wisdom in the pensions industry suggests that, as a
rough guide, you should be saving a sum equivalent to half your age
in order to build a decent pension: for example, 40-year-olds should
be saving 20 per cent of their salary to provide a retirement income
equivalent to at least half and preferably two-thirds of earnings at
retirement. For a 40-year-old on national average earnings of around
30,000 pounds this implies a monthly saving of 500 pounds. Any
contributions made by an employer can count towards this cost and tax
relief on contributions assist. Even so, most people look on such
sums with horror.

There is palpable concern in the population about pension provision.
Certainly letters to Cash reflect anxiety about providing for
retirement, but also a sense of helplessness, anger and frustration
in the face of investment industry scandals (see below). Many young
people now put pensions at the top of their list of financial
planning issues even though they should first be paying off debt
accumulated at university. But many people are unaware of how their
saving is failing to keep up with their increasing life expectancy.

A Mori survey of company scheme members last year for actuary Towers
Perrin showed that 88 per cent of employees expected a secure, stable
retirement, or better. They thought that a pension of half their
salary at retirement would be sufficient to live on but Towers Perrin
says that fewer than half are saving enough to achieve this goal.
Robert Ivey, its head of financial planning, says:'People have to
adjust their expectations. We have much higher expectations of
standards of living in retirement than previous generations.'

The result will be longer working lives and the Government has been
warned that it must raise the statepension age from 65 to 67. Ivey
says: 'It seems to be pretty well accepted
that retiring at 60 is for the favoured few. At some point the
Government has to address this. One of the things that would have
come along if the Government wasn't diverted by the NHS is that they
would be thinking more seriously about compulsory contributions to
stakeholder pensions.'

Last week there was speculation that the Government was prepared to
rebuild state provision from scratch although this was denied by the
Department for Work and Pensions. But former Pensions Minister Frank
Field says that the Government 'should be panicking' about pensions.

Over these six pages we look at the crisis in company pensions,
outline the disenchantment with the private sector, review the
options for providing for retirement yourself and reveal the
complexity of the new state second pension.

Next week: What should be done

Guardian Unlimited › Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002


__

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to