-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/2628044.htm

}}}>Begin
Posted on Fri, Feb. 08, 2002

FBI failed to get Lindh's statement in writing

BY LENNY SAVINO AND FRANK DAVIES
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

WASHINGTON - The FBI may have violated its own rules in questioning
John Walker Lindh by not taping or transcribing his statements, and
that could determine the outcome of the case against him, experts
said Thursday.

The FBI's only record of its two-day interrogation of the accused
Taliban fighter is a summary form written by the agent who questioned
him. Lindh did not sign the form.

`WHERE'S THE PROOF?'

''Everything turns on the confession. If it's thrown out, where's the proof?'' said 
former federal prosecutor Gregory Wallance, now a private attorney in New York City.

The defense and prosecution agree the case depends largely on the FBI's account of an 
interrogation with Lindh on Dec. 9 and 10 while Lindh was a U.S. military prisoner at 
Camp Rhino in southern Afghanistan. But the FBI's
 interview with Lindh appears not to have been recorded, an FBI agent testified this 
week, or transcribed and signed by Lindh.

Prosecutors say other witnesses and incriminating statements by Lindh back up what the 
government characterizes as a confession, but Lindh's defense team plans to attack the 
FBI's interrogation procedures and Lindh's trea
tment before responding to the FBI's questions. The government has said Lindh waived 
his right to an attorney, but the defense said he requested an attorney and was denied 
one.

Lindh, who turns 21 on Saturday, is charged with 10 counts of conspiring with 
Afghanistan's Taliban government and the al Qaeda terrorist network to kill Americans. 
He faces life imprisonment with no possibility of parole
.

In a filing this week, defense attorneys argued that while at Camp Rhino, Lindh was 
stripped, bound, blindfolded, taped to a stretcher and kept outdoors in a metal 
shipping container with only one blanket to keep warm. Af
ter two to three days, he was taken from the shipping container to a tent and his 
blindfold removed. At that point, defense lawyers contend, Lindh asked an FBI agent 
for a lawyer and was told none were available.

RIGHT TO LAWYER

That's not what the prosecution's filings say. They say Lindh waived his right to a 
lawyer voluntarily and ``stated that he has been treated well by the military, and has 
received adequate food and medical treatment while
 in their custody.''

Here's the prosecution's problem: When asked at a bond hearing Wednesday whether any 
recorded or written statement was taken at Lindh's alleged confession, FBI Special 
Agent Anne Asbury answered: ``To my knowledge, no.''

Asbury said that she was not the agent who interrogated Lindh, and that she had flown 
to Afghanistan and prepared Lindh's arrest affidavit from the information provided on 
another agent's report.

The FBI's ''Legal Handbook for Special Agents'' states: ``Where possible, written 
statements should be taken in all cases in which any confession or admission of guilt 
is obtained.''

When a written statement is prepared, the suspect has the right to correct and amend 
it before signing it.

The FBI has offered no explanation as to why taking a written statement would have 
been impossible in Lindh's case, but a U.S. law enforcement official, who asked not to 
be identified, said Thursday that agents broke no r
ules.

On occasion, he said, an agent's official report on an interview, called a Form 302, 
can be used to document a confession. Typically, the agent fills out the form based on 
notes taken during questioning.

Beth Wilkinson, a former prosecutor in the Oklahoma City bombing cases, said the FBI 
often does not tape interviews.

''Just sitting there taking notes is less intimidating than taping and helps you get 
information,'' she said.

Legal experts say the government's highest hurdle will be convincing a jury that Lindh 
made the statements the FBI says he made and that they were given voluntarily.

''The case rises and falls with the confession,'' said Henry Hockeimer, a former 
federal prosecutor now in private practice in Philadelphia. ``It's a tough case from 
the government's standpoint because you may not have ot
her facts to corroborate the conduct he supposedly confessed to.''

Despite the controversy surrounding the alleged confession, it will be hard for a 
judge to not allow the FBI's version of Lindh's questioning given widespread public 
sentiment against him, said Jon Sale, a former Watergat
e prosecutor and private attorney in Miami.

''In a perfect world, the burden is on the government to show Lindh knowingly waived 
his rights,'' Sale said. ``In the real world, given that the public views him as a 
most heinous traitor, it would take a lot of courage
for a judge to throw out that confession.''

BUILDING A CASE

Lindh's lawyers, by their questions, appear aware of the FBI's rules on confessions 
and intent on using them to build a case for rejecting his confession.

Prosecutors, in their brief filed this week, said they plan to buttress the FBI 
account of Lindh's statements with a CNN interview with him on Dec. 2 and statements 
he allegedly made to U.S. soldiers who detained him in A
fghanistan.

''The government will say there's nothing wrong in [soldiers] asking
questions, especially in a battlefield situation,'' said Mark
Tushnet, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University.
``But whether you can use that in a criminal prosecution is a tough
question.''

Sale said the CNN interview would likely be admissible ``if it can be
shown that Lindh was lucid enough to know what he was saying.''







© 2001 miamiherald and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.miami.com
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to