-Caveat Lector-

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,56099,00.html

Forced Vaccines Haunt Gulf Vets By Elliot Borin

Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,56099,00.html

02:00 AM Nov. 07, 2002 PT

It was, the doctor at the Long Beach Veteran's Administration Hospital said, an 
incidental
finding. A little gray smudge on the X- ray, a blob next to the pituitary gland.

Six months later, University of California at Los Angeles surgeons worked six hours to 
sever
a tumor from the brain of a muscular, 25- year-old ex-Special Forces Ranger and Gulf 
War
veteran. The costly surgery was performed at UCLA, the patient said, because VA doctors
denied that the "incidental finding" caused his excruciating, unremitting headaches.

He blamed Army-administered drugs for the tumor. And his girlfriend said there were 
other
"side effects" of his service in the Gulf, including increased agitation and sperm that
"burned."

"We had a third day of shots before we went over (to the Gulf)," said the ex-Ranger, 
who
requested anonymity because his Army Reserve commitment has yet to expire. "Guys in
other units only had two, but most Rangers had three. They wouldn't tell us what they 
were
for."

Are this young man and tens of thousands of other veterans suffering from Gulf War
sickness victims of coincidences beyond the Pentagon's control? Or are they casualties 
of a
government that trampled both the Nuremberg Code and its own policies against forced
medical experimentation?

Ruling in the 1947 trial of 23 Nazi doctors and medical administrators charged with 
crimes
against humanity during World War II, judges of the American Tribunal in Nuremberg set
forth 10 conditions for permissible medical experiments.

In a February 1953 directive, Defense Secretary Charles Wilson established what is 
still the
"law of the land" governing such experimentation. Consistent with the Nuremberg Code, 
the
directive's cornerstone is voluntary consent.

"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential," Wilson wrote,
ordering that such consent be given in writing before at least one witness. Wilson also
banned use of "force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching or other ulterior form of
constraint or coercion" in obtaining consent.

Did the Pentagon obey this directive during the Gulf War?

According to Dr. Jane M. Orient, executive director of the Association of American
Physicians and Surgeons, it did not.

The administration of experimental drugs without consent was, Orient said, "the first
instance in which an official government agency officially sanctioned the direct 
violation of
the Nuremberg Code."

In a 1994 report called Human Experimentation and Other Intentional Exposures Conducted
by the Department of Defense, the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs seemed to
agree.

"The results of our investigation showed a reckless disregard that shocked me," said
Committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV. "The Pentagon ... threw caution to the 
winds,
ignoring all warnings of potential harm, and gave these (investigational) drugs to 
hundreds
of thousands of soldiers with virtually no warnings and no safeguards.

"If that wasn't bad enough, they administered these drugs and vaccines in such a way 
that
there is a very good chance they wouldn't have even worked for the intended purpose."

The committee also found that consent was not part of the inoculation program.

"In a survey of 150 Persian Gulf War veterans ... 15 of 17 receiving botulinum toxoid 
were
told they could not refuse the vaccination; 54 of 73 receiving pyridostigmine were 
told they
could not refuse," the report stated.

"There is no provision in the Nuremberg Code," the Rockefeller Committee report
concluded, "that allows a country to waive informed consent for military personnel or
veterans who serve as human subjects in experiments during wartime or in experiments
that are conducted because of threat of war."

Responding to the accusations, a Pentagon spokesperson stated: "In all peacetime
applications, we believe strongly in informed consent and its ethical foundations.... 
But
military combat is different."

Has the Department of Defense actually obtained the "informed consent" of all the GIs
inoculated with questionable drugs since the end of Operation Desert Storm? That's 
another
story.







Wired News: Staff | Contact Us

We are translated daily into Spanish, Portuguese, and Japanese

© Copyright 2002, Lycos, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to