[CTRL] Would Clinton Try to Assassinate Slobodan Milosevic?

[Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General]

-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

===========================
The Committee for National Solidarity
Tolstojeva 34, 11000 Belgrade, YU

Would Clinton Try to Assassinate Slobodan Milosevic?

Will Creating Anarchy in Other Nations Become American policy?
By Mary Mostert, Analyst, Original Sources (www.originalsources.com)

February 14, 2000

One of my readers, T.V. Weber, who is very knowledgeable on what has and is
happening in Kosovo, e-mailed me a question:


In your February 8, 2000 article entitled "Is It Democracy or Anarchy that
Clinton and Blair Demand in Europe? America Found About KLA the Hard Way in
Kosovo" you end with the powerful paragraph:
"Increasingly, it appears, if voters in other countries don't vote the way
the White House wants them to vote, they are treated as enemies and either
isolated, sanctioned or bombed. And where does that lead? Quite often to the
kind of anarchy that now exists in Kosovo."
My only question is: will this become domestic policy? I would write myself
off as paranoid, however I have several friends in the mental health
profession who insist that I am NOT suffering from that particular neurosis.

My sister Roberta has a little saying about paranoia. "If someone really IS
out to get you, you are not being paranoid for thinking someone is out to
get
you." We have this huge organization called the Central Intelligence Agency
which has a budget of nearly $27 billion. We don't know how many people are
employed there, nor do we know much about what the people there do. It's a
secret. Would the CIA do things that might lead to anarchy in other
countries, like assassinating people elected leaders of other nations, for
instance? Would any NATO country do such a thing, do you suppose?

Well, spying and spies may be changing since the fall of the Soviet Union,
since the reason for the very existence of the CIA, which was created in
1947
with the signing of the National Security Act by President Truman, was to
coordinate the nation's intelligence activities. It was primarily concerned
with the threat of Communism and the Soviet Union. For the last decade, of
course, it has had to find other goals to justify the expenditure of that
$27
billion. The British intelligence agency has had much the same problem.

What appears to have happened is an expansion of intelligence activity in
all
kinds of areas and some of those areas have really bothered some of the
spies
working in the agencies. Richard Tomlinson, a former British Secret
Intelligence Service (MI6) agent who had tried to tell the people of Great
Britain what some of their money was being used for. In 1998 he said, in
part, in an affidavit which was posted on the Internet to the horror of the
intelligence community: (http://www.anaserve.com/~wethepeople/tomlin3.htm)


In 1992, as the civil war in the former Yugoslavia became increasingly
topical, I started to work primarily on operations in Serbia. During this
time, I became acquainted with Dr Nicholas Bernard Frank FISHWICK, born
1958,
the MI6 officer who at the time was in charge of planning Balkan operations.
During one meeting with Dr Fishwick, he casually showed to me a three-page
document that on closer inspection turned out to be an outline plan to
assassinate the Serbian leader President Slobodan Milosevic. The plan was
fully typed, and attached to a yellow "minute board", signifying that this
was a formal and accountable document. It will therefore still be in
existence. Tomlinson named names, dates and places and added: "This plan
contained a political justification for the assassination of Milosevic,
followed by three outline proposals on how to achieve this objective."
Last week the latest in a series of assassinations or near assassinations
took place in Belgrade when the federal minister of defense Pavle Bulatovic
was gunned down by someone who was able to "shoot with precision with an
automatic rifle." The Bulatovic assassination came only three weeks after
the
murder in similar style of Zeljko Raznatovic, a militia leader and Milosovic
supporter known as Arkan in the lobby of Belgrade's plush Intercontinental
Hotel. In early October, on a lonely road south of Belgrade, a truck loaded
with sand plowed into a convoy carrying Serbian opposition leader Vuk
Draskovic and four others to a Sunday picnic. Only Draskovic survived.
Draskovic supported Milosevic throughout the bombing and was critical of
other minority party leaders for taking money offered to Milosevic
opponents.

Of course, the spin put on all these assassinations and assassination
attempts is that they are all Milosevic's fault. For some reason we are all
supposed to believe that Milosevic would hire assassins to kill his
supporters and cabinet officers in highly public mafia style executions.

Would our beloved CIA do such dastardly deeds? Well, apparently even the New
York Times has its suspicions. In a front page story yesterday, entitled,
"U.S. Victims of Chile's Coup: The Uncensored File" the Times reports that
documents recently declassified by Clinton "make clear for the first time
that the State Department concluded from almost the beginning that the
Pinochet government had killed the men, Charles Horman, 31, and Frank
Teruggi, 24." Horman and Teruggi were Americans who supported the socialist
government of Salvador Allende. Those documents indicate that the CIA and
the
Pentagon of collaborated with General Augusto Pinochet, who is now being
accused of human rights violations, to get the two men killed.

The Times reported: "U.S. intelligence may have played an unfortunate part
in
Horman's death," said one newly declassified memo. "At best, it was limited
to providing or confirming information that helped motivate his murder by
the
government of Chile. At worst, U.S. intelligence was aware the government of
Chile saw Horman in a rather serious light and U.S. officials did nothing to
discourage the logical outcome of government of Chile paranoia." In 1980 the
Government was forced to release these documents through the Freedom of
Information Act. However, they were heavily censored in black ink, and
appeared to clear the American and Chilean governments of any
responsibility.
Now that Clinton has released the total document, it is increasingly
apparent
that the CIA was involved in helping the Pinochet regime find the Americans,
who were summarily executed by Pinochet's uniformed troops.

On April 23, 1999 when three laser-guided bombs landed in Milosevic's
bedroom, living room and dining room, the Serbs called it an "assassination
attempt." Kenneth Bacon, Pentagon spokesman, when asked if the bombing of
Milosevic's home was an assassination attempt, said that assassination of
foreign leaders was not "US policy."

I wrote in an analysis of the event
(http://www.originalsources.com/OS4-99MQC/4-23-1999.1.html), "Of course, the
reporter didn't ask what US policy is. He asked if the purpose of bombing
Milosevic's home was to kill him. Bacon didn't answer that question.
However,
it is doubtful that the decision was made to bomb Milosevic's bedroom and
living room to improve his health."

So, to answer T.V.'s question, do I think Bill Clinton and Tony Blair are
capable of adopting a policy which is DESIGNED to create anarchy in other
countries? Yes. They are. I don't know if it is through sheer stupidity or
by
design, but it sure is obvious to me that Clinton's expressed determination
to "get rid" of Slobodon Milosevic has simply moved from bombing his bedroom
in April of 1999 to trying to create fear, distrust and internal wars among
the Serbs who haven't figured it out yet.

To comment: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Secretary General
Mrs. Jela Jovanovic
Art  historian
===========================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om