-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

the tail is wagging the dog here

How to define child pronography?
Who owns the copyright
        consider the nude pictures of
        Dr. Laura
HTTP://celebrityerotic.about.com/people/adult/celebrityerotic/library/weekly/aa110198.htm?LETMEIN=YES

        parents have studio pictures of their
        children in wash tubs
    So should it be defined by owner of the copyright
BUT some countries have people as (what amounts to) slaves
Slaves can be made to sign contracts and still not
want too.

Also with a thin person that does not have the fat
for neuralogical (nerves and brain) function -
the body moves but how many higher brain functions
do some of those porno actresses and actors still have
expessally the ones that look so slim
how much body fat do they have
So they can walk but can they think?

        So, is sex a art or a sport?
The Pied Piper



Kathleen wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
> </A> -Cui Bono?-
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/000309-000011.html
>
> Posted 09/03/2000 12:23pm by Thomas C. Greene in Washington
> Janet Reno would curb press freedom on line
> Constitutional protections of the press are getting in the way of
> cyber-crime prosecutions and may have to be reconsidered, a
> White House committee chaired by US Attorney General Janet
> Reno believes.
> "With the advent of the Internet and widespread computer use,
> almost any computer can be used to 'publish' material. As a result,
> the [Privacy Protection Act of 1980 (PPA)] may now apply to
> almost any search of any computer," the committee's report
> laments.
> The act in question protects the freedom of American journalists,
> scholars and writers to publish freely by prohibiting all law
> enforcement agencies from searching for or seizing "any work
> product materials" or any related "documentary
> materials....possessed by a person....with a purpose to
> disseminate to the public a newspaper, book, broadcast, or other
> similar form of public communication," [42 U.S.C. §2000aa].
> Under those circumstances, the Feds would be forced to find some
> gizmo or technique to copy only those portions of a suspect
> journalist's hard disk which might pertain to a crime, and do it
> without interrupting the work in progress; or, failing that, rely on the
> suspect himself to turn over the relevant files.
> It's a formidable technical challenge, as the Feds must not seize,
> or even examine, data meant for publication, and its supporting,
> documentary information such as notes, transcripts and related
> research materials.
> The Reno Department of Justice (DoJ) apparently finds this an
> intolerable burden, especially while the precious life of an innocent
> child kidnapped by rogue chemistry professors could hang in the
> balance.
> "Because computers now commonly contain enormous data
> storage devices, wrongdoers can use them to store material for
> publication that the PPA protects while simultaneously storing
> child pornography, stolen classified documents, or other
> contraband or evidence of crime," the report warns.
> We may joke about rogue professors, but we're only covering up
> the chill we feel in contemplating the way Internet superstition and
> Reno's relentless child-protective hype might give the Feds the
> excuse they've been waiting for to do an end-run around the PPA.
> It appears that this is exactly what Reno has in mind. "Features of
> the Internet that make it different from prior technologies may
> justify the need for changes in laws and procedures that govern the
> detection and investigation of computer crimes," the committee
> notes ominously.
> The committee's report, "The Electronic Frontier: The Challenge of
> Unlawful Conduct Involving the Use of the Internet" is due to be
> released in final form this month. A draft copy obtained by Wired
> News is available on line here.
> It's a disturbing read. ®
>
> --
> Kathleen
>
> "One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only 
>nine lives." --Mark Twain
>
>

--
Any person can stand adversity,
The true test is to give a person power.

If you treat a relationship as if you are the only one in it, eventually
you will be.

Atrocities happen when the people about you -
 start considering you surplus.

"I tolerate with the utmost latitude the right of
others to differ from me in opinion"
      ---- Thomas Jefferson <br><br>

My Grandfather told me there are two kinds of people:
those who do the work and
those who take the credit.
He told me to be in the first group -
 there is less competition there. -
Indira Gandhi

http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/~index.htm
ICQ 14484977
NEW
http://ThePiedPiper.tripod.com/site_map.htm

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to