-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 11/10/2004 9:53:26 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If
you would do your own research instead of parroting Corporate
Statepropaganda - you might gain some
credibility.flw
NAWI don't think that he will ever gain credibility. He
-Caveat Lector-
Flw2,
And your source for these assertions? The World Wildlife fund?
No, I am not a clueless, knee-jerk Neo-Con ideologue.
I only rely on a multiple of sources - including the oil industry and US
Govt sources.
The bottom line is that at best ANWR over 8-10 years might produce about
-Caveat Lector-
Truer words were never spoken. Prudy
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its
-Caveat Lector-
Say wouldn't be a good idea to to reduce the current oil and LNG tanker
traffic in the world's oceans? The risk is of course tanker crashes which
pollutes water, beaches etc. (Question since crude oil is a naturally
occuring resource and which the earth creates even today can crude
-Caveat Lector-
Say wouldn't be a good idea to to reduce the current oil and LNG tanker
traffic in the world's oceans? The risk is of course tanker crashes which
pollutes water, beaches etc. (Question since crude oil is a naturally
occuring resource and which the earth creates even today can crude
