-Caveat Lector-
>A good question to ask is who would benefit financially from widespread y2k
>panic.
>Agent Smiley
Perhaps a better question to ask is who benefits by continuing to deny the
probable liklihood of substantial infrastructure and financial failure due
to Y2K malfunction?
flw
DECLA
-Caveat Lector-
At 12:37 PM 12/31/98 EST, Gerald Harp wrote:
>This is another view all right. The right wing religious nuts with their
>survivalist shops of wilderness equipment and books have been heavily pushing
>this for some time. Another self interested group would be the y2k
>consultanc
-Caveat Lector-
Yeah, they found a way to interject apocalyptomania into the internet. After
all, if it's posted on the net it must be true.
A good question to ask is who would benefit financially from widespread y2k
panic.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informat
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/31/98 10:47:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Y2K is the biggest scam to come
> along since "reverse engineering", and everyone getting caught up in this
> madness is aiding and abetting the government's planned "national
emergency"
-Caveat Lector-
hmmm..this is interesting
Kinda
(from the Sightings Website)
Y2K - Another View: A Ruthless NWO/Government Takeover Scam
By P.T. "Palm"
<"rebus group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12-30-98
I just want to pass along a few comments regarding the Y2K hysteria that seems
to be so pervas
