Re: New and official CTWM web site: http://ctwm.free.lp.se/

On 19 Feb 2003 09:07, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > I spoke with Dan on the phone a few days ago, and we concluded that > the best thing was for me to handle a new web site. He also said it > was OK for me to grab a copy of http://ctwm.dl.nu/. > > So, that's exactly what I did. http://c

Re: Development discussions on separate list

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:32:44AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I agree with Bjorn that the reason that people dropped off from the > > ctwm list isn't likely to be because it was suddenly focused on > > development. Looking at the archives, I think this list has been > > focused on devel

Re: Who's maintaining the Freshmeat entry?

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:34:24AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message on Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:37:49 >+0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > dl> I originally created it as Claude had been getting questions why there was > dl> no entry. T

Seeking advice on making :xpm:cross better

I'm unhappy with the current looks of :xpm:cross. The cross is drawn entirely using the shadow color, which in my configuration (black, except for the edge that has "light" on it, which is gray85) becomes black on black, so I don't see the cross... I'm thinking some parts of the cross should be d

Re: Development discussions on separate list

=> On 17 Feb 2003 22:18:22 +0100, Mikael Cardell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I agree with Bjorn that the reason that people dropped off from the > ctwm list isn't likely to be because it was suddenly focused on > development. Looking at the archives, I think this list has been > focused on devel

Re: submitting a "theme"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:39:43 -0500, Michael George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: george> In checking out the newly-moved site, I looked at the themes. george> I noticed that all of them use the iconic workspace manager. george> My setup uses a more tabular WM (probably

submitting a "theme"

In checking out the newly-moved site, I looked at the themes. I noticed that all of them use the iconic workspace manager. My setup uses a more tabular WM (probably because I started with a .twmrc file rather than a "theme" :), and while that may be passe, there might be some interested in my con

Re: Patches

I'd like to see reports like this get sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't worry, the message will be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least the message body. Attachments won't get reproduced). Mails sent to ctwm-bugs get stored in my request tracker. The reasons I request this is that my mail load

Re: Patches

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 17 Feb 2003 22:30:07 +0100, Mikael Cardell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> When 3.6 was released, I looked around in the code and found a new mc> pixmap, ":xpm:cross", that I found neat and used in my window mc> decorations. I also happened to change TitleButtonSha

Re: New and official CTWM web site: http://ctwm.free.lp.se/

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 19 Feb 2003 10:03:03 +0100, Mikael Cardell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> This doesn't look right: mc> mc>Download: Quite right. Now corrected. I took some time to convert the whole thing to XHTML Transitional as well... -- Richard Levitte | http://r

Patches

When 3.6 was released, I looked around in the code and found a new pixmap, ":xpm:cross", that I found neat and used in my window decorations. I also happened to change TitleButtonShadowDepth to 1 and noticed that :xpm:cross and the old :xpm:resize didn't follow the value of this variable. If you l

Re: Development discussions on separate list

I agree with Bjorn that the reason that people dropped off from the ctwm list isn't likely to be because it was suddenly focused on development. Looking at the archives, I think this list has been focused on development for a long time. I don't think any casual users of ctwm (if, indeed, there are

Re: New and official CTWM web site: http://ctwm.free.lp.se/

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker) writes: > So, that's exactly what I did. http://ctwm.free.lp.se/ is essentially > a copy of http://ctwm.dl.nu/, with only the changes needed to have it > up to date. > Please take a look and tell me if I missed anything. This doesn't look right:

Re: Who's maintaining the Freshmeat entry?

In message on Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:37:49 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dl> I originally created it as Claude had been getting questions why there was dl> no entry. Thanks to freshmeat constantly rearranging their site, the entry dl> is now rather obs

Re: Who's maintaining the Freshmeat entry?

I originally created it as Claude had been getting questions why there was no entry. Thanks to freshmeat constantly rearranging their site, the entry is now rather obsolete and i dire need of an update. Do I need to transfer "ownership" of the entry somehow for you (or someone else) to update it?

Who's maintaining the Freshmeat entry?

This isn't really a big issue, just a call for me to know who maintains 'http://freshmeat.net/projects/ctwm/?topic_id=56', and especially if that's an active person. -- Richard Levitte | http://richard.levitte.org/ | Spannv. 38, I Levitte Programming | http://www.lp.se/ | S-168 35 B

New and official CTWM web site: http://ctwm.free.lp.se/

I spoke with Dan on the phone a few days ago, and we concluded that the best thing was for me to handle a new web site. He also said it was OK for me to grab a copy of http://ctwm.dl.nu/. So, that's exactly what I did. http://ctwm.free.lp.se/ is essentially a copy of http://ctwm.dl.nu/, with onl