On Tue, Sep 27, 2005, Olaf Seibert wrote about "[ctwm] Re: ctwm memory leaks?":
> I attached a patch that I whipped together while I should have gone to
> sleep. Can you test it?
Thanks. I'll try to test this patch later.
> > These are just two example leaks I found - I can quite easily point to
On Tue 27 Sep 2005 at 00:11:48 +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> The first leak appears to be icon names which are allocated (when fetched
> from the WM property) but never freed. The call trace of this allocation
> is:
> GetWMPropertyString /tmp/ctwm-3.7/util.c:3919
> AddWindow
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:11:48 +0300, "Nadav
Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nyh> These are just two example leaks I found - I can quite easily
nyh> point to more. The question is - is anyone interested that I
nyh> continue to point to more leaks as I find them?
I
Hi everyone,
A few days ago, I noticed that I'm probably breaking some sort of record,
because ctwm has been running on my workstation at work for over 150 days
straight. But one thing worried me: the ctwm process was taking about 10
megabytes of memory, compared to just 3 MB or so that a "fresh"
