In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:05:58 +0300, "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nyh> Now we arrive at three leaks that might be related, and might be nyh> some sort of attempt to do image caching, and not exactly a nyh> leak. However, if this is an attempt to do caching, I don't nyh> understand it, because what remains allocated are just small, nyh> administrative structures, and not the actual icon image As far as I recall, icons and other small images are usually cached by the X server, with a certain amount of control from the client. So I'm *guessing* that the administrative part is simply to keep around references to images stored in the server process. I haven't dived in that part of the code yet, so I don't really know. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis
