On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Olaf Seibert via RT, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Do the following steps to see some funny behaviour of the Occupy
> window:
Speaking of funny behavior of the Occupy window, has anybody ever seen
anything like my post ~1.5 years ago about
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:02:08AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Anthony Thyssen via RT, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> It is definately not a window managers responsiblity to chnage
> window contents..
This is (at least, AIUI) about the title bar, though, not the window
contents.
It sounds like a reaso
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:02:08AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Anthony Thyssen via RT, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> It is definately not a window managers responsiblity to chnage
> window contents..
This is (at least, AIUI) about the title bar, though, not the window
contents.
It sounds like a reaso
[sorry, I've not been otherwise occupied and not monitored closely
enough and missed this]
> > Can somebody please explain to me (and to the manual page!) how virtual
> > screens are supposed to work (conceptually)? What is their relation to
> > workspaces? The manpage uses them as synonyms. C
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jan 23 02:02:07 2007]:
>
> It is definately not a window managers responsiblity to chnage window
> contents.. That is asking for trouble!!
Uhmmm, I think you misread. This is about the window title, which is something
ctwm
renders, not the application. The applicati
OK, thank you!
Ticket resolved.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jan 23 02:09:17 2007]:
>
> "Richard Levitte via RT" on wrote...
> | Gah! Wrong picture! This is the right one!
> |
> | image with (UL) and (LR) geometry lines...
>
> That would be fine.
>
> Anthony Thyssen ( System Programmer )
"Richard Levitte via RT" on wrote...
| Gah! Wrong picture! This is the right one!
|
| image with (UL) and (LR) geometry lines...
That would be fine.
Anthony Thyssen ( System Programmer )<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
"Richard Levitte via RT" on wrote...
| This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your
| E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.
|
| --=_guardian-24673-1169469426-0001-2
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Mi
"Richard Levitte via RT" on wrote...
| Does anyone have a comment on this one? Would you say this is one of those
"It's Not the
| TWM way!"?
|
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Mar 04 23:38:47 2006]:
| >
| > Hello.
| >
| > I have a suggestion for a rather cosmetic enhancement in CTWM, my window
|
On Sun 21 Jan 2007 at 00:57:42 +0100, Rhialto via RT wrote:
> At first glance I don't think it is related, but then I've never used
> AutoRaise (or RaiseDelay). Maybe it's just that the app window raises
> itself above the menu, I don't really know what kind of events give rise
> (pun not intended)
On Sun 21 Jan 2007 at 00:57:42 +0100, Rhialto via RT wrote:
> At first glance I don't think it is related, but then I've never used
> AutoRaise (or RaiseDelay). Maybe it's just that the app window raises
> itself above the menu, I don't really know what kind of events give rise
> (pun not intended)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:38:35 +0100, Rhialto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rhialto> I wonder, btw, what should done with "sqeezed" windows (aka
rhialto> "rolled up"): should doing that to the group leader also do
rhialto> it to the group members? Or unmap them, like happ
I have committed my group leader changes. I have (for the moment) at
least decided that the de-iconification problem is not a problem
introduced by them - maybe they are even a problem of ExMH, since its
exmh.BUGS file mentions the phenomenon.
I wonder, btw, what should done with "sqeezed" windows
Do the following steps to see some funny behaviour of the Occupy window:
1. Invoke f.occupy on some window (I have it in a menu that is activated
by a title bar button).
2. Move to a different workspace, one which does not show the original
window. The intention is apparently that the Oc
Does anyone have a comment on this one? Would you say this is one of those
"It's Not the
TWM way!"?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Mar 04 23:38:47 2006]:
>
> Hello.
>
> I have a suggestion for a rather cosmetic enhancement in CTWM, my window
> manager of choice. It would be nice if highlighted win
Implemented and is part of revision 5b6a1cacc71313898a8d96fbba7b801ce3923ba0
(newly
committed and pushed).
Ticket resolved. Thanks for the suggestion!
> [levitte - Wed Apr 20 04:46:05 2005]:
>
> In my ctwm definition this is a special 'grab handle' to raise/lower or
> move the window. EG:...
Gah! Wrong picture! This is the right one!
--
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown u
Gah! Wrong picture! This is the right one!
--
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jan 22 08:43:01 2007]:
>
> "Richard Levitte via RT" on wrote...
> | Hey Anthony, if you're still around (this was a while ago), can you
> | tell me if the current information display is good enough, so I know
> | if I should close this ticket?
> |
> | I'm a little confus
"Richard Levitte via RT" on wrote...
| I just implemented, tested and committed this. The enhancement is on
| the RandomPlacement statement itself by having it take a second
| argument that specifies the displacement.
|
| > I'd love to specify some "RandomPlacement" styles. Currently windows
|
20 matches
Mail list logo
