Re: [ctwm] Depth-arrangement of windows is not preserved?

2007-01-22 Thread Todd Kover
[sorry, I've not been otherwise occupied and not monitored closely enough and missed this] > > Can somebody please explain to me (and to the manual page!) how virtual > > screens are supposed to work (conceptually)? What is their relation to > > workspaces? The manpage uses them as synonyms. C

[ctwm] Re: repository has a double-free() bug

2006-05-21 Thread Todd Kover
> kovert> > Didn't it help enough to make tmp_win->HiliteImage NULL? > kovert> > kovert> no. It still ended up freeing memory that was already freed. > kovert> I'm not quite clear on where it got the value from to pass in > kovert> after setting it to NULL. > > Wait, so you're saying that

[ctwm] Re: repository has a double-free() bug

2006-05-21 Thread Todd Kover
> OK, I've a question: why do you remove the code entirely? presumably this is supposed to get freed at some point, just not twice, so I left it in there for someone to try to dig into it (presumably the original commiter/patch provider). Near as I can tell, this code is the only code that ac

[ctwm] Re: repository has a double-free() bug

2006-05-21 Thread Todd Kover
> kovert> note that this is against the cvs repository, and 3.7 does not > kovert> suffer from this. > > Uhmm, are you aware that the CVS repository has been deprecated for a > while now? > > I guess it's time to turn it off entirely... sorry, s/cvs/monotone 0.26 server that you upgraded

[ctwm] repository has a double-free() bug

2006-05-21 Thread Todd Kover
I'm working on getting changes to the virtual workspaces pushed up and I found a bug in the recent memory management cleanups where memory is being freed twice. The attached patch against cvs should comment out the code causing the issue, but I have yet to track down what the right answer is to fr

[ctwm] Re: ctwm and virtual screens

2006-04-22 Thread Todd Kover
> kovert> I've run into a few other issues that I fixed with the > kovert> attached patch: > > Patch applied, committed and puched. great, thanks. > I imagine you're going to do more work, do you want write > access to the repository? I'm hoping to run through my list over the next few

[ctwm] ctwm and virtual screens

2006-04-21 Thread Todd Kover
Using 3.7, when I add config directives for two virtual screens in an two monitor Xinerama configuration, it seems to be no different than when I don't have the configuration directive at all. This behavior has been reported here before. Poking at the code, it looks like InitVirtualScreens() is c