Ah, ok! I'll close this ticket then. If anyone has a complaint, refile a new
change request ;-).
Thanks.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 20 09:09:39 2007]:
>
> On Fri 19 Jan 2007 at 14:57:36 +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> > This was almost two years ago, the problem that not all m4 supp
On Fri 19 Jan 2007 at 14:57:36 +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> This was almost two years ago, the problem that not all m4 support -s. Is
> this still the case, or can I just close this ticket without looking further?
Hm, it seems that somehow my own "solution" for this crept into the
chec
On Fri 19 Jan 2007 at 14:57:36 +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> This was almost two years ago, the problem that not all m4 support -s. Is
> this still the case, or can I just close this ticket without looking further?
Hm, it seems that somehow my own "solution" for this crept into the
chec
This was almost two years ago, the problem that not all m4 support -s. Is this
still the case, or can I just close this ticket without looking further?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Feb 28 01:23:34 2005]:
>
> On Sun 27 Feb 2005 at 01:10:02 +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
