Re: [Patch] - travis-ci

2013-10-21 Thread Remy 'Sieben' Leone
Hello, 2013/10/20 Daniel Stenberg > Thanks! > > I'm willing to give this a try to see if it does any good for us. Where > can we see the results or overview of any other existing project's use of > this? I can't seem to find any! > https://travis-ci.org/jquery/jquery https://travis-ci.org/rails

Re: CURLINFO_GNUTLS_SESSION (was Re: Patch: Support CURLINFO_CERTINFO with GnuTLS)

2013-10-21 Thread Christian Grothoff
Hello! Is it common that nobody responds in a timely fashion to patches sent to this list? I'd really like to know if this patch is now going to be accepted, or if we have to do something else to get access to SSL certificates. Thanks! Christian On 10/15/2013 03:26 PM, Christian Grothoff w

Re: CURLINFO_GNUTLS_SESSION (was Re: Patch: Support CURLINFO_CERTINFO with GnuTLS) [resent, as first attempt didn't make it to list archive]

2013-10-21 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 10/15/2013 10:37 PM, Dan Fandrich wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote: Here's an improved patch that makes this (presumably) SSL-backend independent. I only tested it with GnuTLS though, and some SSL backends are not supported by the patch. The patch wo

Re: [Patch] - travis-ci

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Remy 'Sieben' Leone wrote: https://travis-ci.org/jquery/jquery https://travis-ci.org/rails/rails https://travis-ci.org/twbs/bootstrap As you see little projects ;-) I see. I'm just dissappointed about the (lack of) presentation. What's a project supposed to do with that?

Re: CURLINFO_GNUTLS_SESSION (was Re: Patch: Support CURLINFO_CERTINFO with GnuTLS)

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Christian Grothoff wrote: First, stop the top-posting please. Is it common that nobody responds in a timely fashion to patches sent to this list? I'd really like to know if this patch is now going to be accepted, or if we have to do something else to get access to SSL ce

Re: CURLINFO_GNUTLS_SESSION (was Re: Patch: Support CURLINFO_CERTINFO with GnuTLS)

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Christian Grothoff wrote: Here's an improved patch that makes this (presumably) SSL-backend independent. I only tested it with GnuTLS though, and some SSL backends are not supported by the patch. The patch would need to be applied on top of the 2nd patch I sent (#2 and #

Re: CURLINFO_GNUTLS_SESSION (was Re: Patch: Support CURLINFO_CERTINFO with GnuTLS)

2013-10-21 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 10/21/2013 01:14 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Christian Grothoff wrote: First, stop the top-posting please. Eh, I've always hit "reply" in Icedove, so this should not create top-posts. Is it common that nobody responds in a timely fashion to patches sent to this list?

Re: CURLINFO_GNUTLS_SESSION (was Re: Patch: Support CURLINFO_CERTINFO with GnuTLS)

2013-10-21 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 10/21/2013 01:26 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Christian Grothoff wrote: Here's an improved patch that makes this (presumably) SSL-backend independent. I only tested it with GnuTLS though, and some SSL backends are not supported by the patch. The patch would need to be ap

RE: CURLINFO_GNUTLS_SESSION (was Re: Patch: Support CURLINFO_CERTINFO with GnuTLS)

2013-10-21 Thread Yehezkel Horowitz
>So does anyone else on this list care about good security (ok, within the >limits set by TLS)? If so, please let Daniel know that access to certificate >data might be a good thing. If you don't care about security, please turn of >your computer now ;-). We all (and especially Daniel) care abou

Re: [Patch] - travis-ci

2013-10-21 Thread Remy 'Sieben' Leone
It's true that you have a wider variety of machines. Travis core audience is web/script projects. That's why they focus on offering more runtime than offering more OS. That being said, travis-ci offer a C toolchain that I think could be useful. One other feature of travis is to have on each pull r

Re: [Patch] - travis-ci

2013-10-21 Thread Remy 'Sieben' Leone
Here is the new patch with before_script only doing ./buildconf && ./configure Best regards Rémy 2013/10/21 Remy 'Sieben' Leone > It's true that you have a wider variety of machines. Travis core audience > is web/script projects. That's why they focus on offering more runtime than > offering

Re: [Patch] - travis-ci

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Remy 'Sieben' Leone wrote: Here is the new patch with before_script only doing ./buildconf && ./configure But why? I quote from the manual I pointed to: Because C projects on travis-ci.org assume Autotools and Make by default, naturally, the default command Travis CI wi

libcurl & nagle

2013-10-21 Thread folkert
Hi, How does libcurl send commands? Does it batch up a command so that it and its parameters are send in one go? Or should one keep nagle switched on to reduce overhead? (talking ftp here) Has anyone measured how much this overhead is in a typical libcurl ftp session? I'm looking into optimizing a

Re: Server Verfication skipped with version 7.21.2

2013-10-21 Thread Ravi Doppalapudi
I double checked the code, you are right. Further down the line in another function call - the CURL_OPT_SSL_VERIFY_PEER was explicitly disabled . Its working now and is not skipping the verification. I had a related question - is there a way to specify a list of files to CURLOPT_CAINFO when my c