On Thu, 30 Oct 2013, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Thank you for testing. My refactoring of the synchronous error
> handling code was a smidge too aggressive. Here is an updated
> patch.
I briefly mentioned this in my base64 decode thread earlier today but I just
wanted to post the more finer detail he
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Steve Holme wrote:
> > In summary I have no idea why Test 206 is failing at present, so
> > if you could do some digging Daniel that would be great.
>
> I've just pushed out another fix - I hadn't extracted the header
> value out when operating in Proxy Tunnel mode :(
>
> Hope
Hi Björn,
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 21:40:12 Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > Maybe we should commit the change you suggest also upstream in order to
> > improve the debugging experience of binary releases?
>
> Yes, unless this attached patch fixes it. Please test it at your
>
On Sat, 01 Nov 2013, Steve Holme wrote:
> In summary I have no idea why Test 206 is failing at present, so if
> you could do some digging Daniel that would be great.
I've just pushed out another fix - I hadn't extracted the header value out
when operating in Proxy Tunnel mode :(
Kamil sent me a
Hi all,
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013, Steve Holme wrote:
> > > As such I have pushed a slightly tidier version of my fix and
> > > hopefully the 19:20 auto build will pick it up and we'll see how
> > > we get on.
> >
> > Test 206 fails now, but if I revert cdccb422671aeb it works again
> > for me...
> >
