Updating src tree:
P src/bin/hostname/hostname.1
P src/bin/hostname/hostname.c
P src/common/lib/libc/arch/m68k/string/memset.S
P src/common/lib/libc/arch/m68k/string/strcmp.S
P src/common/lib/libc/arch/m68k/string/strncmp.S
P src/crypto/dist/ipsec-tools/src/racoon/isakmp_xauth.c
P src/distrib/sets
Hi Simon !
OK, kernel tty driver is fine from pps-api output - good news.
From the code you should be seeing refclock_pps: messages
once a second when you run ntpd at debug level 2 (-d -d).
Also the code expects the captured PPS timestamp to be not
older then 1.5 seconds and within 0.45 seconds
In article <20130719161217.0e11359...@thoreau.thistledown.com.au>,
Simon Burge wrote:
>Hi Frank!
>
>Frank Kardel wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon !
>>
>> Two observations:
>> NetBSD 5 has 4.2.4p6.
>>
>> NetBSD 6+current have 4.2.6p5.
>
>I did try 4.2.4p6 (from NetBSD 5) on NetBSD 6 and behaves the same
>b
Hi Frank!
Frank Kardel wrote:
> Hi Simon !
>
> Two observations:
> NetBSD 5 has 4.2.4p6.
>
> NetBSD 6+current have 4.2.6p5.
I did try 4.2.4p6 (from NetBSD 5) on NetBSD 6 and behaves the same
broken way.
Just for kicks, I tried a NetBSD 6 kernel on NetBSD 5 but ntpd reports
refclock_
On a -current/amd64 box of 16 Jul 2013, I just mounted some
f: 1992060 8000370 Linux Ext2 0 0# (Cyl. 7936*-
9913*)
partitions (using mount_ext2fs, not fuse), and started a copy (cp -a)to
a raid 1
file system: /dev/rraid3a
cylgrp dynamic inodes FFSv2 sbl
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:14:38PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On a -current/amd64 box of 16 Jul 2013, I just mounted some
>
> f: 1992060 8000370 Linux Ext2 0 0# (Cyl. 7936*-
> 9913*)
Let's assume that as this linux disk is so old that ext2 (not ext3) was
still the d
On a -current/amd64 box of 16 Jul 2013, I just mounted some
f: 1992060 8000370 Linux Ext2 0 0# (Cyl. 7936*- 9913*)
partitions (using mount_ext2fs, not fuse), and started a copy (cp -a)to
a raid 1
file system: /dev/rraid3a
cylgrp dynamic inodes FFSv2 sblock FFSv2 f
Hi Simon !
Two observations:
NetBSD 5 has 4.2.4p6.
NetBSD 6+current have 4.2.6p5.
Also note that the PPS samples seems to be ~two seconds apart and there is
also a difference of ~2 seconds between now and the asser time stamp.
The ATOM driver should be just using the difference between the fic
Hi Johhny,
Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On 2013-07-19 06:30, Simon Burge wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Is anyone happily running a stratum 1 NTP server with a GPS with a PPS
> > signal on NetBSD 6?
>
> My first reaction is that your first paste is from having ntpd just been
> running a very short t
On 2013-07-19 06:30, Simon Burge wrote:
Hi folks,
Is anyone happily running a stratum 1 NTP server with a GPS with a PPS
signal on NetBSD 6?
I've got a Garmin GPS18x on a Soekris net4801 where the GPS clock has
a funny offset. Here's the output from "ntpq -pn":
remote refid
10 matches
Mail list logo