Yes, I think you can set UNSUPPORTED_COMPILER.pcc in the Makefile and it
will proceed using a different one
For the time being, I'll make a note of all the tools that pcc cannot
currently build, and set Makefiles accordingly. I'm not sure if these tools
under gpl track upstream or not, so at l
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, William D. Jones wrote:
> First error of the night:
>
> # compile libiberty/regex.o
> /mnt/lfs/NetBSD-CVS/src/../tools/bin/i486--netbsdelf-pcc -O2-std=gnu99
> -Werror -Os -Wno-error=uninitialized -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized
> --sysroot=/mnt/lfs/NetBSD-CVS/src/../de
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, William D. Jones wrote:
> I recall reading that build.sh can automatically determine which sources pcc
> can compile and which sources it cannot, so I'll let pcc attempt to build the
> userland and will report back if it fails on any targets that I cannot fix (or
> skip) mysel
On 2014/07/25 7:40, Patrick Welche wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:36:43PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21:29PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:43:57PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
Surprise (-current/amd64):
# cpuctl identify 0
cpu0: highest
Updating src tree:
P src/crypto/external/bsd/heimdal/dist/kcm/cache.c
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.arm
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.mips
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/ad.powerpc
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/md.amd64
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/md.sparc64
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/sh
Accidentally forgot to Cc: the mailing list... whoops!
-Original Message-
From: William D. Jones
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:55 PM
To: Jeff Rizzo
Subject: Re: ARM ABI changes/combinations (was Re: Preparation for creating
netbsd-7 branch)
That said, if people don't care about
First error of the night:
# compile libiberty/regex.o
/mnt/lfs/NetBSD-CVS/src/../tools/bin/i486--netbsdelf-pcc -O2-std=gnu99
-Werror -Os -Wno-error=uninitialized -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized --sysroot=/mnt/lfs/NetBSD-CVS/src/../destdir/i386-pb
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/mnt/lfs/NetBSD-CVS
Good going :D!
As of 5 minutes ago, by setting HAVE_GCC=4, HAVE_PCC=1, MKGCC=no, and
MKPCC=yes, I've successfully compiled the current pcc in the NetBSD source
tree (using i486--netbsdelf-gcc) into my (global for all archs) NetBSD tools
directory. pcc has also just successfully built a kernel
Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> > Hi alnsn,
> >
> > The bpfjit_mbuf_ldb_ind, bpfjit_mbuf_ldh_ind, bpfjit_mbuf_ldw_ind test
> > cases of the net/bpfjit/t_mbuf test are failing on amd64 since the
> > following commits:
> >
> > 2014.07.22.08.20.08 alnsn src/
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:36:43PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21:29PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:43:57PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > > Surprise (-current/amd64):
> > >
> > > # cpuctl identify 0
> > > cpu0: highest basic info 00
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21:29PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:43:57PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > Surprise (-current/amd64):
> >
> > # cpuctl identify 0
> > cpu0: highest basic info 000d
> > cpu0: highest extended info 8008
> > cpu0: "Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:43:57PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Surprise (-current/amd64):
>
> # cpuctl identify 0
> cpu0: highest basic info 000d
> cpu0: highest extended info 8008
> cpu0: "Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz"
> cpu0: Intel Xeon E3-12xx, 2nd gen i7, i5, i3 2xxx (68
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2014, William D. Jones wrote:
>
> > > it certainly is. I think I remember that __USE() now, it was a local
> > > (NetBSD) addition due to a set but unused variable, which is changed in
> > > upstream versions now.
> > Alright then. What do
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Hi alnsn,
>
> The bpfjit_mbuf_ldb_ind, bpfjit_mbuf_ldh_ind, bpfjit_mbuf_ldw_ind test
> cases of the net/bpfjit/t_mbuf test are failing on amd64 since the
> following commits:
>
> 2014.07.22.08.20.08 alnsn src/sys/net/bpfjit.c 1.29
> 2014.07.22.08.29.51
(Please keep me on the cc: when replying, otherwise we get 24-hour lags
such as this waiting for me to check list mail again)
On 7/23/14, 12:10 PM, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
Attached is the proposed diff to build.sh with the changes, including
hpcarm -> MACHINE
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.NetBSD.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2014.07.24.14.22.55.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
/tmp/bracket/build/2014.07.24.14.22.55-i386/src/e
Hi alnsn,
The bpfjit_mbuf_ldb_ind, bpfjit_mbuf_ldh_ind, bpfjit_mbuf_ldw_ind test
cases of the net/bpfjit/t_mbuf test are failing on amd64 since the
following commits:
2014.07.22.08.20.08 alnsn src/sys/net/bpfjit.c 1.29
2014.07.22.08.29.51 alnsn src/sys/net/bpfjit.c 1.30
Log output from one o
17 matches
Mail list logo
