On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:55:52PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Thanks. So if it survives a build, can I commit the attached patch?
Thomas
LGTM
Martin
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:56:11PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
I think the issue is: After #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L and #include
stdio.h, fseeko() and ftello() should be declared, but in some unspecified
version of NetBSD they are not declared. Similarly, after #define
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Thanks. So if it survives a build, can I commit the attached patch?
Yes, that looks fine.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:09:39 +
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius rm...@netbsd.org wrote:
Harry Waddell wadd...@caravaninfotech.com wrote:
I know NPF is a work in progress, and so is its documentation, but now
that I have used it for a fairly large project, I have several questions
and a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NetBSD Security Advisory 2015-003
=
Topic: NTPd multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2014-929[3-6])
Version:NetBSD-current: source prior to Dec 19, 2014
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.NetBSD.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2015.03.23.08.31.43.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NetBSD Security Advisory 2015-006
=
Topic: OpenSSL and SSLv3 vulnerabilities
Version:NetBSD-current: source prior to Jan 14th
NetBSD 6.1 -
Hi, Uwe.
but I found a problem with vlan interfaces.
You can create a vlan interface with:
ifconfig vlan8 create
ifconfig vlan8 vlan 8 vlanif ixg0 up
The interface is generated. But there are no packages. ifconfig -v shows no
inbound packets. tcpdump on ixg0 but indicates tagged packets for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NetBSD Security Advisory 2015-005
=
Topic: buffer overflow in libevent (CVE-2014-6272)
Version:NetBSD-current: source prior to Jan 29th
NetBSD
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
Is this problem filed PR? If not, could you file a PR?
Could you test with this patch?
The path dosn't solve the problem.
Here the requested information:
HW:
023:00:0: Intel 82599 (SFP+) 10 GbE Controller (ethernet network, revision 0x01)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:05:22PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article 20150323162935.ga20...@netbsd.org,
David Holland dholland-curr...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:55:52PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Thanks. So if it survives a build, can I commit the attached
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:55:52PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Thanks. So if it survives a build, can I commit the attached patch?
I question the merits of _LARGEFILE_SOURCE (are we going to start
mucking with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS too?) but whatever.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On Mar 23, 11:18pm, w...@netbsd.org (Thomas Klausner) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: language lawyering: ftello/fseek/pread edition
| There is no need for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE here, please remove it.
|
| New version attached.
| Thomas
That looks fine.
Thanks,
christos
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:29:35PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:55:52PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Thanks. So if it survives a build, can I commit the attached patch?
I question the merits of _LARGEFILE_SOURCE (are we going to start
mucking with
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:23:42 +
S.P.Zeidler s...@netbsd.org wrote:
the vulnerability fixes for the latest advisory set from OpenSSL went
in last week; this is merely an exercise getting to a clean copy,
especially since OpenSSL changed the source format and we'll want to
do updates in the
15 matches
Mail list logo
