daily CVS update output

2016-07-11 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/share/man/man9/pci_msi.9 P src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/locore.S P src/sys/arch/amd64/conf/ALL P src/sys/arch/arc/arc/bus_space_sparse.c P src/sys/arch/arc/arc/c_nec_eisa.c P src/sys/arch/arm/arm32/arm32_tlb.c P src/sys/arch/arm/arm32/cpu.c P

modstat(8) - right-alignment for numeric fields?

2016-07-11 Thread Paul Goyette
It's always bothered me that we have the numeric-valued SIZE field, but it is printed with left-alignment. This looks rather awkward. (The REFS field also has this problem, but its contents are nearly always a single digit, so alignment is not noticeable.) Would anyone have serious

build failure for pmax

2016-07-11 Thread coypu
Hi, I can get a build failure using: ./build.sh -j2 -m pmax -U -O ../obj kernel=INSTALL Error being: # compile INSTALL/cache_r4k.o /usr/src/../obj/tooldir.NetBSD-7.99.33-amd64/bin/mipsel--netbsd-gcc -Wa,-msoft-float -G 0 -mno-abicalls -msoft-float -ffixed-24 -ffreestanding

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2016-07-11 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2016.07.11.11.31.51. An extract from the build.sh output follows: --- dependall-sortinfo --- --- sortinfo.html1

Re: netstat -ia broken

2016-07-11 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 07:05:51AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > Since the last update (7.99.33/amd64/20160705), my bulk builds leave > behind netstat processes with 99% CPU. ozaki-r has fixed it. Thanks! Thomas

Re: Potentially undesirable behavior with apropos(1)

2016-07-11 Thread thilo jeremias
> > With the new apropos(1), most of the times you would find the result > you were searching for in the top, there will be some unrelated > results also in the mix, but you can just ignore them. :) > >> >> I just wonder how can I search for the cryptic keywords I used to be able to >> find. >

Re: Potentially undesirable behavior with apropos(1)

2016-07-11 Thread thilo jeremias
> On 8 Jul 2016, at 5:36 PM, Abhinav Upadhyay > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo > wrote: >> Abhinav Upadhyay writes: >> >>> We just need to handle the special cases where we

netstat -ia broken

2016-07-11 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! Since the last update (7.99.33/amd64/20160705), my bulk builds leave behind netstat processes with 99% CPU. Looking at the ps output, they are: "netstat -ia". When I run this manually, I get netstat: kvm_read: Bad address default netstat: kvm_read: Bad address

Re: Potentially undesirable behavior with apropos(1)

2016-07-11 Thread Erik Fair
> On Jul 8, 2016, at 08:36, Abhinav Upadhyay > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo > wrote: >> Abhinav Upadhyay writes: >> >>> We just need to handle the special cases where we