Re: wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Michael van Elst
p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) writes: >In any case, if the bp->b_flags access needs to be protected by the >mutex, a cursory grep shows that there are some other places that might >need similar treatment, in wapbl_do_io(), wapbl_resize_buf(), and >wapbl_write_blocks(). Not b_flags, just the

daily CVS update output

2016-09-06 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/lib/librumpclient/rumpclient.c P src/lib/librumpuser/rumpuser_sp.c P src/sys/dev/hpc/btnmgr.c P src/sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c Updating xsrc tree: Killing core files: Running the SUP scanner: SUP Scan for current starting at Wed Sep 7 03:01:27 2016 SUP Scan for current co

Re: wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Paul Goyette
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Michael van Elst wrote: p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) writes: Basically, I cloned the hard drive of my other machine using dd, and then put the copy in the new machine, and booted. It comes up fine in single-user mode. However, shortly after typing ^D to the single-use

Re: mDNSResponder name resolution broken in 7.99.4

2016-09-06 Thread Fredrik Pettai
> On 6 Sep 2016, at 18:14, Richard PALO wrote: > > Le 24/02/15 08:19, Fredrik Pettai a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> I noted that mDNSResponder name resolution stopped working on 7.99.4 (built >> 4 feb) >> >> -bash-4.3$ more /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep hosts >> hosts: files dns mdnsd multicast

Re: mDNSResponder name resolution broken in 7.99.4

2016-09-06 Thread Richard PALO
Le 24/02/15 08:19, Fredrik Pettai a écrit : > Hi, > > I noted that mDNSResponder name resolution stopped working on 7.99.4 (built 4 > feb) > > -bash-4.3$ more /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep hosts > hosts: files dns mdnsd multicast_dns > # hosts:dns, files, nis, mdnsd, multic

Re: Is NetBSD ReFUSE layer capable to do MTP?

2016-09-06 Thread Brad Spencer
Rhialto writes: > On Sun 04 Sep 2016 at 19:15:07 +, Daniel Ölschlegel wrote: >> The library libmtp(in Pkgsrc) comes with a test program which should >> list some devices, so maybe its a problem with the library which i can >> debug if someone could establish a connection. > > Yes, I don't see

Re: wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Paul Goyette
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Michael van Elst wrote: p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) writes: Basically, I cloned the hard drive of my other machine using dd, and then put the copy in the new machine, and booted. It comes up fine in single-user mode. However, shortly after typing ^D to the single-use

Re: wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Michael van Elst
p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) writes: >Basically, I cloned the hard drive of my other machine using dd, and >then put the copy in the new machine, and booted. It comes up fine in >single-user mode. However, shortly after typing ^D to the single-user >shell, it fails a KASSERT at sys/kern/v

Re: wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Paul Goyette
FWIW, this seems to be something specific to wapbl. I was able to boot single-user, tunefs the file systems to set the log size to zero, and edit /etc/fstab (to remove -o log). Once I did this, and wapbl was thus completely disabled, the system came up just fine. I know that the amount of me

Re: wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Rin Okuyama
On 2016/09/06 17:05, Paul Goyette wrote: Kewl! How is your performance? I was talking with Matt Thomas the other day, and he suggested that having so much memory might introduce significant overhead in page management. Hmm. This machine used to have 32GB memory. When it was increased, I fel

Re: wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Rin Okuyama
I doubt if it is really a problem of too much memory. I'm using a dual processor Xeon E5-2687W machine with 256GB memory, and single FFS partitions in two SATA drives are in use with WAPBL. % dmesg ... NetBSD 7.99.36 (XXX) #0: Fri Aug 26 22:51:41 JST 2016 rin@XXX:XXX total memo

wapbl panic on new system with too much memory!

2016-09-06 Thread Paul Goyette
I'm in the process of installing a new machine, and I'm getting a reproducible panic at boot time. The machine is a Intel Core i7-6900 (8 cores, 16 threads, 3.2GHz) on an ASUS X99-E motherboard. It is fully-populated with 8 x 16GB DDR4 DIMMs (for a total, yes, of 128GB!). Basically, I clone