W^X mmap

Hi! Why doesn't the following code get rejected by pax mprotect? #include #include int main() { int * a; a = mmap(NULL, BUFSIZ, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANON, -1, 2); if (a == MAP_FAILED) printf("mmap failed\n"); return 0; }

daily CVS update output

Updating src tree: P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/debug/mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/modules/mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi P src/etc/mtree/NetBSD.dist.tests P src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-glint/Makefile P src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/locore.S P

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the NetBSD test suite. The newly failing test cases are: dev/audio/t_pad:pad_output net/npf/t_npf:npf_table The above tests failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in at least 27 consecutive runs before that.

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2016.12.09.13.06.02 martin src/sys/dev/audio.c,v 1.271 2016.12.09.13.06.41 roy src/sys/kern/kern_module.c,v 1.118 2016.12.09.13.16.22 christos

Re: The NPF firewall leaks! (was Re: in_cksum: out of data)

Mindaugas Rasiukevicius writes: > I agree that this is not really intuitive and the documentation did > not clarify this either. Yes, the documentation should be changed to state that when you explicitly specify tcp and stateful, you get the s/safr set. Most importantly, the

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:57:50AM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > Yesterday morning, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > > build failure. > > --- audio.o --- > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > ***