Updating src tree:
P src/common/lib/libc/arch/arm/string/strcpy_arm.S
P src/common/lib/libc/arch/arm/string/strcpy_naive.S
P src/common/lib/libc/arch/arm/string/strcpy_thumb.S
P src/common/lib/libc/arch/arm/string/strlcat.S
P src/crypto/external/cpl/tpm-tools/dist/src/tpm_mgmt/tpm_nvread.c
P
It must have been some transient issue that only affected machines with
bnx(4) interfaces. I also netboot/NFS-root'd machines with wm(4) and
bge(4) on amd64-7.99.55 (they all share the same "/usr" NFS mount) and
they completed multi-user boot.
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, John D. Baker wrote:
>
Masanobu SAITOH writes:
> On 2016/11/28 17:16, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
>> Hello, Jarle.
>>
>> On 2016/11/27 0:45, Jarle Greipsland wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> Was this problem ever fixed?
>>
>> Perhaps no. I've added a lot of changes into if_wm.c, but I've not
>> touched vlan related
Masanobu SAITOH writes:
> Please test the latest -current. knakahara found a problem:
That worked fine! No longer any need for the tcpdump hack. :)
(I didn't get the latest -current; I just added those patches to 7.99.39.)
-tih
--
Most people who graduate with CS
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:43:19PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:00:20PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:15:19PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > > Given how many tests are based on rump, am I the only one seeing this?
... because the tests
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2017.01.13.14.48.18.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
--- lz_encoder_mf.po ---
In file included
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:00:20PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:15:19PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > Given how many tests are based on rump, am I the only one seeing this?
> >
> > $ rump_allserver -v unix://sock
> > Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:15:19PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Given how many tests are based on rump, am I the only one seeing this?
>
> $ rump_allserver -v unix://sock
> Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
> 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012,
Given how many tests are based on rump, am I the only one seeing this?
$ rump_allserver -v unix://sock
Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. All rights