On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:02:13AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> errno = 0;
> t = mktime(&tms);
> ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(0, t != (time_t)-1);
I guess the author meant to write:
errno = 0;
t = mktime(&tms);
ATF_REQUIRE(errno == 0;
ATF_REQUIRE(t != (t
Am 25.10.2017 um 15:24 schrieb Matt Sporleder:
On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:30 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
I was watching a build of netbsd-7 scroll past (it cam be amusing
watching gcc printing warnings about code in gcc...) when I saw this
one fly past.
To me this looks like it might indicate a real
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:52:52 + (UTC)
From:NetBSD Test Fixture
Message-ID: <150895397201.5616.843588977796354...@babylon5.netbsd.org>
| The newly failing test cases are:
|
| lib/libc/time/t_mktime:mktime_negyear
I have been looking at this one (first)
Updating src tree:
P src/bin/sh/jobs.c
P src/bin/sh/sh.1
P src/bin/stty/stty.1
P src/distrib/notes/common/main
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/debug/shl.mi
P src/doc/CHANGES
P src/doc/TODO.smpnet
P src/etc/namedb/root.cache
P src/exter
Thanks, that was it - I recall seeing something recently, as far as I
remember it was a security issue. I should have checked sysctl before
asking the question.
Chavdar Ivanov
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 at 09:28 Robert Swindells wrote:
>
> Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> >I guess I might have missed somethin
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:52:52 + (UTC)
From:NetBSD Test Fixture
Message-ID: <150895397201.5616.843588977796354...@babylon5.netbsd.org>
| This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
| NetBSD test suite.
|
| The newly failing test cases
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
lib/libc/time/t_mktime:mktime_negyear
lib/libc/time/t_mktime:timegm_epoch
lib/libc/time/t_strptime:Zone
lib/libc/time/t_strptime:zone
lib/libutil/t_parsedate:d
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:30 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
>
> I was watching a build of netbsd-7 scroll past (it cam be amusing
> watching gcc printing warnings about code in gcc...) when I saw this
> one fly past.
>
> To me this looks like it might indicate a real error, rather than
> just typical gcc
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again.
The following commits were made between the last failed build and the
successful build:
2017.10.25.08.12.37 maya src/sys/arch/amiga/dev/event.c,v 1.14
2017.10.25.08.12.37 maya src/sys/arch/arc/dev/opms.c,v 1.22
2017.10.25.08.12.37 maya s
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:28:42 +0100
From:Robert Swindells
Message-ID:
| You now need to set the following sysctl options:
|
| emul.linux.enabled=1
| emul.linux32.enabled=1
Those should be made to default that way. Systems that want them off
should turn t
Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
>I guess I might have missed something recently.
I don't see an announcement of the change in the current-users archive,
it was discussed on tech-kern.
>I used to run Linux emulation - at least a few weeks ago. I see my .opera
>folder has files changed as recently as 21st
Roy Marples writes:
> I think that should be it now.
> All test cases on all platforms currently passing.
It also still works as it should for me, including the gratuitous ARP.
-tih
--
Most people who graduate with CS degrees don't understand the significance
of Lisp. Lisp is the most importa
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2017.10.25.06.32.59.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
--- dependall-usr.sbin ---
dependall ===> usr.
I was watching a build of netbsd-7 scroll past (it cam be amusing
watching gcc printing warnings about code in gcc...) when I saw this
one fly past.
To me this looks like it might indicate a real error, rather than
just typical gcc noise.
If anyone cares, here is the warning (the build continued
I guess I might have missed something recently.
I used to run Linux emulation - at least a few weeks ago. I see my .opera
folder has files changed as recently as 21st of September. I don't remember
doing anything to stop it from running. Besides Opera, I have installed
some suse131 and a a few sus
15 matches
Mail list logo
