Re: NetBSD-amd64 8.99.26 is very slow

2018-11-26 Thread bch
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:43 PM Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Adam wrote: > > I am try to compile lang/rust under NetBSD-amd64 8.99.26 (today's build) > on VirtualBox. The process is extremely slow, and top is showing weird > values: > > Rust loves to eat

daily CVS update output

2018-11-26 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/bin/sh/eval.c P src/bin/sh/redir.c P src/distrib/sets/lists/modules/md.sparc64 P src/lib/csu/arch/aarch64/crt0.S P src/lib/csu/arch/alpha/crt0.S P src/lib/csu/arch/arm/crt0.S P src/lib/csu/arch/earm/crt0.S P src/lib/csu/arch/hppa/crt0.S P src/lib/csu/arch/i386/crt0.S P

Re: NetBSD-amd64 8.99.26 is very slow

2018-11-26 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Adam wrote: > I am try to compile lang/rust under NetBSD-amd64 8.99.26 (today's build) on > VirtualBox. The process is extremely slow, and top is showing weird values: Rust loves to eat as much cores as possible. That doesn't play well with limited

Re: apu2 SATA patch

2018-11-26 Thread Jaromír Doleček
Committed this. Le lun. 26 nov. 2018 à 22:28, Mike Pumford a écrit : > > > > On 26/11/2018 15:16, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Mike Pumford writes: > > > >> I have one of these. The msata needs needs a small patch (needs an > >> entry in the quirks table to be properly recognised as an ahci > >>

apu2 SATA patch

2018-11-26 Thread Mike Pumford
On 26/11/2018 15:16, Greg Troxel wrote: Mike Pumford writes: I have one of these. The msata needs needs a small patch (needs an entry in the quirks table to be properly recognised as an ahci controller) but other than that it seems to work. No stability issues using sdhc as the system disk.

NetBSD-amd64 8.99.26 is very slow

2018-11-26 Thread Adam
Greetings, I am try to compile lang/rust under NetBSD-amd64 8.99.26 (today's build) on VirtualBox. The process is extremely slow, and top is showing weird values: load averages: 3.41, 3.15, 3.74; up 0+00:52:47 21:30:15 24

Re: failed to create llentry

2018-11-26 Thread Greg Troxel
co...@sdf.org writes: > Apparentlysome of the route table entries are special and should not be > deleted. indeed. > After flushing them and attempting to add a default route, I get these > messages over and over again. > > ifconfig iwm0 10.0.0.1 delete > ifconfig iwm0 10.0.0.1 > > re-creates

Re: failed to create llentry

2018-11-26 Thread coypu
Apparentlysome of the route table entries are special and should not be deleted. After flushing them and attempting to add a default route, I get these messages over and over again. ifconfig iwm0 10.0.0.1 delete ifconfig iwm0 10.0.0.1 re-creates the magical route stuff so I can add a default

mfii0 kudos to bouyer@ Was Re: dmesg | grep -c "not configured" = 240...

2018-11-26 Thread Stephen Borrill
Thanks Manuel! [ 1.048805] mfii0 at pci11 dev 0 function 0: "RAID 930-8i 2GB Flash", firmware 50.3.0-1075, 2048MB cache [ 1.048805] mfii0: interrupting at ioapic4 pin 2 [ 1.048805] scsibus0 at mfii0: 64 targets, 8 luns per target [ 2.161214] scsibus0: waiting 2 seconds for