Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

2019-02-16 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2019.02.17.04.57.09 kamil src/tests/lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait.c,v 1.90 2019.02.17.05.06.16 nonaka src/sys/arch/x86/x86/lapic.c,v 1.70

Re: problems with USB/CDC serial (umodem) - devices work with Linux, Mac OS X, and FreeBSD, but not NetBSD

2019-02-16 Thread Martin Husemann
Please show us more details, like: - kernel messages how the devices attach - maybe kernel messages from somewhere else (FreeBSD?) You can use ktrace on the daemon process to see the communication it does via the serial device. First important part: which device node is it opening? E.g. it

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2019-02-16 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2019.02.17.04.19.39. An extract from the build.sh output follows: rip_call < sce->sce_user_end) ||

re: README: gcc 7 switch coming to a port near you!

2019-02-16 Thread matthew green
matthew green writes: > Andreas Gustafsson writes: > > Some days ago, matthew green wrote: > > > hopefully the sparc testbed will fix itself now. > > > > It did, but MIPS is suffering from what looks like the same issue > > yeah - i commited the hack for it already, but i think i've just >

re: mac68k kern-INSTALL vs GCC7?

2019-02-16 Thread matthew green
"John D. Baker" writes: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, John D. Baker wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Jaromir Dolecek wrote: > > > > > Maybe something like this? > > > > > > https://www.netbsd.org/~jdolecek/mac68k_intr_gcc7.diff > > > > With this the build succeeds. > > > > Will check Matthew

daily CVS update output

2019-02-16 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/external/gpl3/gcc/lib/libgcc/arch/m68000/defs.mk P src/external/gpl3/gcc/lib/libgomp/arch/aarch64/config.h P src/external/gpl3/gcc/lib/libgomp/arch/alpha/config.h P src/external/gpl3/gcc/lib/libgomp/arch/arm/config.h P

Re: mac68k kern-INSTALL vs GCC7?

2019-02-16 Thread John D. Baker
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, John D. Baker wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Jaromir Dolecek wrote: > > > Maybe something like this? > > > > https://www.netbsd.org/~jdolecek/mac68k_intr_gcc7.diff > > With this the build succeeds. > > Will check Matthew Green's version after the next round of updates.

Re: current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
(to finish what I intended to say above) and the break apparently is not directly connected to the newly introduced Hyper-V devices in GENERIC, which came to my mind earlier. On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 00:00, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > > I can confirm that the fix suggested in >

Re: current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
I can confirm that the fix suggested in https://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=53984 works for me, reverting src/sys/arch/x86/x86/lapic.c to 1.68 gets me % uname -a NetBSD marge.lorien.lan 8.99.34 NetBSD 8.99.34 (GENERIC) #1: Sat Feb 16 23:52:16 GMT 2019

Re: current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
Thanks, I will try the suggested fix after the build completes. On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 21:42, Cherry G.Mathew wrote: > > Chavdar Ivanov writes: > > > Mine is 8.99.34 from 09/02/2019, self build, works just fine. I'll > > build a new kernel now to compare. > > > > Just FYI in case this is

Re: current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
I am still building, but my guess is that some clever clogs has added Microsoft Hyper-V devices to GENERIC: .. % cvs diff -r 1.515 -r 1.516 GENERIC 19-02-16 - 21:52:48 Index: GENERIC === RCS file:

Re: current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Cherry G . Mathew
Chavdar Ivanov writes: > Mine is 8.99.34 from 09/02/2019, self build, works just fine. I'll > build a new kernel now to compare. > Just FYI in case this is relevant and can help you with bisecting: https://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=53984 -- ~cherry

Re: current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
Mine is 8.99.34 from 09/02/2019, self build, works just fine. I'll build a new kernel now to compare. On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 21:12, Ron Georgia wrote: > > Same here. Fails to boot on both my workstation and laptop, fell back to > 8.99.33 > > On 2/16/19, 3:15 PM, "Arto Huusko" of

Re: current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Ron Georgia
Same here. Fails to boot on both my workstation and laptop, fell back to 8.99.33 On 2/16/19, 3:15 PM, "Arto Huusko" wrote: Hello, it seems latest -current amd64 kernel no longer boots on VirtualBox. Booting GENERIC from

Re: gcc7 AMD kernel fails to boot

2019-02-16 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 09:14:51PM +, Patrick Welche wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:52:20PM +, Patrick Welche wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:45:14AM +, Patrick Welche wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 07:22:26PM +1100, matthew green wrote: > > > > hmm. can you try a

problems with USB/CDC serial (umodem) - devices work with Linux, Mac OS X, and FreeBSD, but not NetBSD

2019-02-16 Thread Rob Newberry
This is not necessarily limited to NetBSD-CURRENT, though the problem exists there (that’s where I reproduced it). I’m happy to take it elsewhere or offline — I just couldn’t figure out where the right eyes might see it. Please point me elsewhere if I’m not in the right spot. Short story:

current fails to boot on VirtualBox

2019-02-16 Thread Arto Huusko
Hello, it seems latest -current amd64 kernel no longer boots on VirtualBox. Booting GENERIC from http://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/HEAD/201902161050Z/amd64/binary/kernel/ stops after detecting CPUs and acpiacad0. After CPU detection there is ERROR: 3591 cycle TSC drift observed. CPU is

Re: build error with MKX11MOTIF=yes in mk.conf

2019-02-16 Thread Benny Siegert
> MKX11MOTIF=yes This is the first time that I hear of this make variable :) I'd file a PR. -- Benny

Re: mac68k kern-INSTALL vs GCC7?

2019-02-16 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <4559.1550263...@splode.eterna.com.au>, matthew green wrote: >this is my preferred change vs jarmoir's. please test it. > > https://www.netbsd.org/~mrg/mac68k-intr.diff > >i was also planning on adding an assert that MAX_INAME_LENGTH is >less than (eintrnames - intrnames). I would