Re: NetBSD on a wireless router?

> On Aug 15, 2019, at 8:15 PM, John Franklin wrote: > > because I usually use the Ubiquiti APs for WiFi. For WiFi performance and > management on a budget, they’re hard to beat. +1. I use Ubiquiti to cover the 3 levels of my house + back yard, and it works flawlessly (total of 4 APs to do t

Re: NetBSD on a wireless router?

On Aug 15, 2019, at 14:57, r...@reedmedia.net wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, John Franklin wrote: > >> Are you absolutely committed to NetBSD? pfSense is an excellent >> router/firewall distribution built on top of FreeBSD, with support for >> whatever WiFi and hardware FreeBSD supports. I lov

daily CVS update output

Updating src tree: P src/bin/pax/Makefile cvs update: `src/distrib/notes/common/list-portmasters.pl' is no longer in the repository P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi P src/doc/CHANGES P src/doc/CHANGES.prev P src/external/bsd/compiler_rt/lib/clang/include/sanitizer/Makefile P src/external/gpl3/gc

Re: building and testing 9.99

Hi all! On 8/7/19 7:18 AM, m...@netbsd.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: Hi All, I want to rebuild all userland. Is there now a recommended way to skip all the llvm stuff which is extremely big.. and as far as I know, not needed for my Intel graphic c

Re: NetBSD on a wireless router?

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:51 AM, r...@reedmedia.net wrote: I want to replace a wifi router with a NetBSD solution. The posting at links to a spreadsheet of hardward, but I don't know from that yet what has wireless an

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2019.08.15.19.53.01 martin src/usr.sbin/installboot/Makefile,v 1.54 2019.08.15.19.53.01 martin src/usr.sbin/installboot/machines.c,v 1.42 Log files can

Re: NetBSD on a wireless router?

hello. My Dell Latitude 400 has an Atheros mini-pci wifi card in it that runs great with NetBSD-5.2 in hostap mode, serving 802.11BG clients. I believe it's using the open source HAL code. While this isn't 802.11N or 802.11AC, I use it regularly in this mode to "tether" devices wishing t

Re: NetBSD on a wireless router?

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, John Franklin wrote: > Are you absolutely committed to NetBSD? pfSense is an excellent > router/firewall distribution built on top of FreeBSD, with support for > whatever WiFi and hardware FreeBSD supports. I love NetBSD, but when I > need to set up a router, I just grab pf

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2019.08.15.16.01.27. An extract from the build.sh output follows: --- gpt_make --- --- create.d --- #cre

Re: kern/54289 hosed my RAID. Recovery possible?

For the gorey details, see the latest addenda to PR kern/54289. At least in my case, this PR bit me on this host adapter, but for some it works fine with the same host adapter. Thanks Brian and Greg for the confirmation of my supposition. The case was that the components were "sort-of" there, bu

Re: kern/54289 hosed my RAID. Recovery possible?

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, jdba...@consolidated.net wrote: > An 'fsck -f' run is in progress. This showed no errors. The RAID is back in service. Whew! -- |/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS NetBSD Darwin/MacOS X |\ / jdbaker[snail]consolidated[flyspeck]net OpenBSDFreeBSD | X

Re: build.sh flag "-u"

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:52:09PM +0100, Arthur Barlow wrote: > I have some uncertainty about the application of the "-u" flag in > build.sh. The docs say it prevents "make clean." But without it will > rebuild everything, including tools. I've used the flag before > without problems, but recen

build.sh flag "-u"

I have some uncertainty about the application of the "-u" flag in build.sh. The docs say it prevents "make clean." But without it will rebuild everything, including tools. I've used the flag before without problems, but recently I've had the build break on a couple of occasions. I'm not doing a

Re: kern/54289 hosed my RAID. Recovery possible?

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:07:46 -0500 jdba...@consolidated.net wrote: > On 2019-08-15 00:03, jdba...@consolidated.net wrote: > > The SiI3214 SATALink card suffers from the identify problem in > > netbsd-9 and -current (PR kern/54289). > > > > Booting a netbsd-9 kernel, the drives failed to identify

Re: kern/54289 hosed my RAID. Recovery possible?

hello. Yes, raidctl -C with the original config file that created the raid, or one you faked up for the occasion, should get you going again. Once you configure the raid with raidctl -C, you can then run parity checks and filesystem checks without a problem. I've done this sort of thing

Re: Another exciting error building lang/mono...

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 15:12, wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:50:52PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > > BTW I just noticed there are no gnome packages in > > /usr/pkgsrc/meta-packages any more, while there are still some in x11 > > directory - was there any announce that it has been phased ou

Re: Another exciting error building lang/mono...

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:50:52PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > BTW I just noticed there are no gnome packages in > /usr/pkgsrc/meta-packages any more, while there are still some in x11 > directory - was there any announce that it has been phased out? It was GNOME2, I am under the impression GNO

Re: kern/54289 hosed my RAID. Recovery possible?

On 2019-08-15 00:03, jdba...@consolidated.net wrote: The SiI3214 SATALink card suffers from the identify problem in netbsd-9 and -current (PR kern/54289). Booting a netbsd-9 kernel, the drives failed to identify which caused RAIDframe to mark the 4 drives on that card (of 8) in my RAID as FAILE

Re: Another exciting error building lang/mono...

BTW I just noticed there are no gnome packages in /usr/pkgsrc/meta-packages any more, while there are still some in x11 directory - was there any announce that it has been phased out? On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 13:09, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > > It actually is a part of the package: > $ export MONO_CON

Re: Another exciting error building lang/mono...

It actually is a part of the package: $ export MONO_CONFIG=/usr/pkg/share/examples/mono/config $ csharp Mono C# Shell, type "help;" for help Enter statements below. csharp> The bug is actually elsewhere - ktrace shows: 22455 1 mono-sgen open("/usr/pkg/etc/mono/mono/config", 0, 0xff8295b8) E

Re: kern/54289 hosed my RAID. Recovery possible?

jdba...@consolidated.net writes: >Is there any way to unmark them so the raid will configure and recover? >Normally 'raidctl -C' is used during first time configuration. Could it >be used to force configuration, ignoring the FAILED status? Would the >RAID >be recoverable with parity rebuild afte

kern/54289 hosed my RAID. Recovery possible?

The SiI3214 SATALink card suffers from the identify problem in netbsd-9 and -current (PR kern/54289). Booting a netbsd-9 kernel, the drives failed to identify which caused RAIDframe to mark the 4 drives on that card (of 8) in my RAID as FAILED. Rebooting netbsd-8, the drives identify properly, bu