daily CVS update output

Updating src tree: P src/common/lib/libc/arch/arm/atomic/atomic_op_asm.h P src/distrib/sets/lists/man/mi P src/doc/3RDPARTY P src/external/cddl/osnet/sbin/zfs/mount_zfs.8 U src/external/mit/expat/dist/CMake.README U src/external/mit/expat/dist/CMakeLists.txt P src/external/mit/expat/dist/Changes

Stability issues with recent NetBSD 9.0_BETA amd64

I've been playing with NetBSD 9.0_BETA amd64 from nyftp on a laptop for a little while and noticed a significant drop in stability sometime after Aug 18 (I have an Aug 18 kernel which seems solid, but Sep 2, 7 and 10 also panic) The symptoms include - netbsd-8 firefox binary segfault every time on

re: Stability issues with recent NetBSD 9.0_BETA amd64

> I've been playing with NetBSD 9.0_BETA amd64 from nyftp on a laptop for a > little while and noticed a significant drop in stability sometime after Aug > 18 (I have an Aug 18 kernel which seems solid, but Sep 2, 7 and 10 also > panic) i am hoping this problem is already fixed in -current and on

Re: etc/rc.d/zfs not installed

Hei, On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:13:53AM -0400, Brad Spencer wrote: > [...] > Thanks for seeing that.. my fault... I did not notice the .endif. yep, wasnt that easy to see for me too ;-) Kurt

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

Martin Husemann writes: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:46:53PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: >> On i386, MKZFS is not defined even though mk.conf(5) says it is. >> Which one is wrong, the code or the manpage? > > The man page is wrong, MKZFS does not make sense on anything with a 32bit > kernel.

Re: etc/rc.d/zfs not installed

"K. Schreiner" writes: > Hi, > > sorry for the last mail, patch was wrong! > > I hope, thats the right one now: > > Index: etc/rc.d/Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvsroot/src/etc/rc.d/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.105 > diff -u -r1

etc/rc.d/zfs not installed

Hi, sorry for the last mail, patch was wrong! I hope, thats the right one now: Index: etc/rc.d/Makefile === RCS file: /cvsroot/src/etc/rc.d/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.105 diff -u -r1.105 Makefile --- etc/rc.d/Makefile 15 Sep

Re: Legacy ZFS mounts

Thanks, it's fine. I didn't add 'zfs=YES' to /etc/rc.conf as running '/etc/rc.d/zfs start' without it did not produce the usual warning of undefined variable. On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 12:21, Brad Spencer wrote: > > Chavdar Ivanov writes: > > > Since yesterday I don't get my zfs fule systems automa

/etc/rc.d/zfs not installed when X11=no

Hi, seems an .endif got lost in src/etc/rc.d/Makefile, so /etc/rc.d/zfs is only installed when X11 != "no". Fix: Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvsroot/src/etc/rc.d/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.105 diff -u -r1.105 Makefile --- e

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:46:53PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > On i386, MKZFS is not defined even though mk.conf(5) says it is. > Which one is wrong, the code or the manpage? The man page is wrong, MKZFS does not make sense on anything with a 32bit kernel. Martin

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

b...@anduin.eldar.org (Brad Spencer) writes: >I will look at that, but won't be for a bit... apparently a "./build.sh >.. release" does not show off that sort of thing. Fixed. It was broken on builds without MKFS, i.e. everything but amd64. -- -- Michael van El

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

Brad Spencer wrote: > > == 2 missing files in DESTDIR > > Files in flist but missing from DESTDIR. > > File wasn't installed ? > > -- > > ./usr/share/man/html8/mount_zfs.html > > ./usr/share/man/man8/mount_zfs.8 > > end

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

Andreas Gustafsson writes: > The build is still failing as of source date 2019.09.16.04.59.32, > now with a different error: > > == 2 missing files in DESTDIR > Files in flist but missing from DESTDIR. > File wasn't installed ? > -- >

Re: Legacy ZFS mounts

Chavdar Ivanov writes: > Since yesterday I don't get my zfs fule systems automatically mounted, > I have to issue 'zfs mount -a'. > > Should I add some entry in /etc/fstab or place the above command in > one of the scripts? > > The zvols are accessible as usual. Add zfs=YES to your rc.conf. It

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2019.09.16.08.31.05 mlelstv src/distrib/sets/lists/man/mi,v 1.1653 2019.09.16.09.35.20 maya src/external/mit/expat/dist/Attic/expat_config.h,v 1.2 Log

Re: Legacy ZFS mounts

Since yesterday I don't get my zfs fule systems automatically mounted, I have to issue 'zfs mount -a'. Should I add some entry in /etc/fstab or place the above command in one of the scripts? The zvols are accessible as usual. On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 14:54, Brad Spencer wrote: > > m...@netbsd.org

Re: ./build.sh -m amd64 .... distribution fails

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:37:50AM +0200, K. Schreiner wrote: > nbmake[6]: stopped in /u/NetBSD/src/external/mit/expat/lib/libexpat > /u/NetBSD/src/external/mit/expat/dist/lib/xmlparse.c:73:14: fatal error: > sys/random.h: No such file or direct > ory > #include /* getrandom */ >

Re: ./build.sh -m amd64 .... distribution fails

k...@ub.uni-mainz.de ("K. Schreiner") writes: >nbmake[6]: stopped in /u/NetBSD/src/external/mit/expat/lib/libexpat >/u/NetBSD/src/external/mit/expat/dist/lib/xmlparse.c:73:14: fatal error: >sys/random.h: No such file or direct >ory > #include /* getrandom */ > ^~ >c

./build.sh -m amd64 .... distribution fails

Hi, with current source cvs upped some minutes ago running ./build.sh -u -N 1 -j 12 -U -m amd64 -O /u/NetBSD/arch/amd64/obj -D /u/NetBSD/arch/amd64/dest -R /u/NetBSD/arch/amd64/release -T /u/NetBSD/arch/amd64/TOOLS distribution fails: nbmake[6]: stopped in /u/NetBSD/src/external/mit/expat/l