Michael van Elst wrote:
> g...@gson.org (Andreas Gustafsson) writes:
>
> >mitigations, which I guess is not really surprising. But the 12% net
> >increase from jemalloc and the 7% increase from vfs_vnode.c 1.63 seem
> >to call for closer investigation.
>
> Is this also reflected in real time?
This is awesome - I know it took a lot of work (your section on bisection
briefly alluded to that), so thanks for doing all of this - very, very
useful
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 11:27, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Back in September, I wrote:
> > I'm trying to run a bisection to
Le jeu. 14 nov. 2019 à 21:41, Christos Zoulas a
écrit :
> In article <24013.43646.552099.15...@guava.gson.org>,
> Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Back in September, I wrote:
>
> > 12% increase:
> >
> >2019.03.08.20.35.10 christos src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk 1.1108
> >
> >
Updating src tree:
P src/doc/CHANGES
P src/external/apache2/llvm/Makefile.inc
P src/external/gpl3/gcc/usr.bin/host-libcpp/Makefile
P src/share/man/man7/sysctl.7
P src/sys/arch/aarch64/aarch64/aarch64_machdep.c
P src/sys/arch/aarch64/aarch64/pmap.c
P src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/amd64_trap.S
P
On 11/14/19, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Back in September, I wrote:
>> I'm trying to run a bisection to determine why builds hosted on recent
>> versions of NetBSD seem to be taking significantly more system time
>> than they used to, building the same thing.
>
> I finally have
g...@gson.org (Andreas Gustafsson) writes:
>mitigations, which I guess is not really surprising. But the 12% net
>increase from jemalloc and the 7% increase from vfs_vnode.c 1.63 seem
>to call for closer investigation.
Is this also reflected in real time?
--
--
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:05:05PM +, Dave Tyson wrote:
> I've been playing with wine64 under NetBSD 8.1_STABLE and it works
> surprisingly well with a couple of windows applications I need to run. Of
> course NetBSD-8 doesn't have support for USER_LDT baked in and so I have been
> testing
I've been playing with wine64 under NetBSD 8.1_STABLE and it works
surprisingly well with a couple of windows applications I need to run. Of
course NetBSD-8 doesn't have support for USER_LDT baked in and so I have been
testing under a NetBSD current kernel.
How much work would be involved in
In article <20191114200928.ga2...@homeworld.netbsd.org>,
wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:26:54PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
>> 12% increase:
>>
>> 2019.03.08.20.35.10 christos src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk 1.1108
>>
>> Back to using jemalloc for x86_64; all problems have been
In article <24013.43646.552099.15...@guava.gson.org>,
Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>Back in September, I wrote:
> 12% increase:
>
>2019.03.08.20.35.10 christos src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk 1.1108
>
>Back to using jemalloc for x86_64; all problems have been resolved.
Indeed I
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:26:54PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> 12% increase:
>
> 2019.03.08.20.35.10 christos src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk 1.1108
>
> Back to using jemalloc for x86_64; all problems have been resolved.
I wonder if enabling back MAP_ALIGNED in jemalloc can help.
Hi all,
Back in September, I wrote:
> I'm trying to run a bisection to determine why builds hosted on recent
> versions of NetBSD seem to be taking significantly more system time
> than they used to, building the same thing.
I finally have some results to report. These are from builds of the
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Patrick Welche wrote:
> > I have been running with vm.ubc_direct=1 and feeling a speedup and no
> > inconveniences on multicore systems. What are thoughts on having it as
> > a default?
>
> No such option is documented, hence
Patrick Welche wrote:
> I have been running with vm.ubc_direct=1 and feeling a speedup and no
> inconveniences on multicore systems. What are thoughts on having it as
> a default?
No such option is documented, hence the question makes no sense.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
I have been running with vm.ubc_direct=1 and feeling a speedup and no
inconveniences on multicore systems. What are thoughts on having it as
a default?
Cheers,
Patrick
15 matches
Mail list logo