Xen FreeBSD domU block I/O problem begins somewhere between 8.99.32 (2020-06-09) and 9.99.81 (2021-03-10)

2021-04-16 Thread Greg A. Woods
So I was just reminded that I do still have a Xen server that's still running the 8.99.32 kernel and Xen-4.11. I had not been testing on it because it still of course has the vnd(4) CHS size bug (and because it's also hosting my $HOME and /usr/src and I don't want to crash it), and I had not

HEADS UP: GCC 10 now default on several ports

2021-04-16 Thread matthew green
hi folks. i've switched the alpha, amd64, sparc*, riscv*, ia64, and vax ports have all been switched to GCC 10. please send-pr or send email here about problems you encounter. thanks. .mrg.

daily CVS update output

2021-04-16 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi P src/external/bsd/top/dist/machine/m_netbsd.c P src/external/gpl3/gcc/README.gcc10 P src/share/man/man9/Makefile P src/share/misc/acronyms P src/share/misc/acronyms.comp P src/sys/arch/aarch64/aarch64/pmap.c P src/sys/dev/cardbus/cardslot.c P

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

2021-04-16 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2021.04.17.00.02.19 christos src/usr.bin/shlock/shlock.c,v 1.15 2021.04.17.00.05.31 mrg src/sys/kern/subr_evcnt.c,v 1.17 Logs can be found at:

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-04-16 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2021.04.16.22.41.12. An extract from the build.sh output follows: nbmake[7]: stopped in

Re: one remaining mystery about the FreeBSD domU failure on NetBSD XEN3_DOM0

2021-04-16 Thread Greg A. Woods
At Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:44:08 +0100, David Brownlee wrote: Subject: Re: one remaining mystery about the FreeBSD domU failure on NetBSD XEN3_DOM0 > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 08:41, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > > What else is different? What am I missing? What could be different in > > NetBSD current

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

2021-04-16 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2021.04.16.18.31.28 christos src/usr.bin/printf/printf.c,v 1.52 Logs can be found at:

Re: Build failure for usr.bin/printf

2021-04-16 Thread Paul Goyette
Christos has committed a fix On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: #metoo  On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 19:22, Paul Goyette wrote: With $SRCDIR updated on 2021-04-16 at 18:08:17 UTC I am seeing ... # compile csh/printf.o /build/netbsd-local/tools/x86_64/amd64/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc -O2

Re: Build failure for usr.bin/printf

2021-04-16 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
#metoo  On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 19:22, Paul Goyette wrote: > > With $SRCDIR updated on 2021-04-16 at 18:08:17 UTC I am seeing > > ... > # compile csh/printf.o > /build/netbsd-local/tools/x86_64/amd64/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc -O2 -fPIE -g > -std=gnu99-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes

Build failure for usr.bin/printf

2021-04-16 Thread Paul Goyette
With $SRCDIR updated on 2021-04-16 at 18:08:17 UTC I am seeing ... # compile csh/printf.o /build/netbsd-local/tools/x86_64/amd64/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc -O2 -fPIE -g -std=gnu99-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -Wsystem-headers

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-04-16 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2021.04.16.15.10.18. An extract from the build.sh output follows: --- dependall-share --- nbmake[4]: stopped in

Re: one remaining mystery about the FreeBSD domU failure on NetBSD XEN3_DOM0

2021-04-16 Thread David Brownlee
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 08:41, Greg A. Woods wrote: > What else is different? What am I missing? What could be different in > NetBSD current that could cause a FreeBSD domU to (mis)behave this way? > Could the fault still be in the FreeBSD drivers -- I don't see how as > the same root problem

Re: one remaining mystery about the FreeBSD domU failure on NetBSD XEN3_DOM0

2021-04-16 Thread Greg A. Woods
So I wrote a little awk script so that I could write 512-byte blocks with varying values of bytes. (Awk is the only decent programming language on the FreeBSD mini-memstick.img which I could think of that would do something close to what I wanted it to do. I could have combined awk+sh+dd and