Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
David Holland wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:32:20AM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote: > > Logs below are usually more helpful. > > Right... I wonder what happened to bracket's error-matching script; it > usually does better than that. There are multiple causes, but a major one is that since babylo

daily CVS update output

2021-07-18 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/doc/3RDPARTY P src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c P src/external/cddl/osnet/sys/sys/vnode.h P src/sys/arch/alpha/common/sgmap_common.c P src/sys/arch/alpha/common/sgmap_typedep.c P src/sys/arch/alpha/include/bus_defs.h P src/sys/arch/alpha/pci/cia_

Re: Weird ldd problem

2021-07-18 Thread RVP
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: The main difference is indeed ... (RPATH) Library rpath: [$ORIGIN/:$ORIGIN/../../lib/libast:$ORIGIN/cmds:$ORIGIN/../../lib/libdll] I have to read more to understand it though... $ORIGIN? That's yet another way to locate shared librarie

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

2021-07-18 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2021.07.19.01.06.14 thorpej src/sys/arch/alpha/pci/cia_dma.c,v 1.37 2021.07.19.01.06.14 thorpej src/sys/arch/alpha/pci/ciavar.h,v 1.22 2021.07.19.01.

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread David Holland
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 01:28:06AM +, David Holland wrote: > that is... less than helpful :-( > > it looks like CVS randomly didn't commit some of my changes, > investigating... Yeah, not sure what happened; something caused it to, apparently, think a few of the files in the second change

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread Rin Okuyama
On 2021/07/19 10:28, David Holland wrote: that is... less than helpful :-( it looks like CVS randomly didn't commit some of my changes, investigating... Logs below are usually more helpful. On 2021/07/19 9:42, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: Logs can be found at: http://releng.NetBSD.org/b

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread David Holland
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:42:49AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources from CVS date 2021.07.18.23.57.34. > > An extract

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2021.07.18.23.57.34. An extract from the build.sh output follows: ${MAKEDIRTARGET} . ${SUBDIR_GROUP.${:U}:C/

Anyone still using PCI "isp" SCSI / FC controllers?

2021-07-18 Thread Jason Thorpe
The Qlogic ISP SCSI / FC driver PCI front-end appears to universally support using 64-bit PCI DMA addresses, based on my reading of this code block in isp_pci_dmasetup(): if (sizeof (bus_addr_t) > 4) { if (rq->req_header.rqs_entry_type == RQSTYPE_T2RQS) {

netbsd update expanded kernel with netbsdIleNEk file name

2021-07-18 Thread Andrius V
Hi, Today I upgraded my current setup from the latest nycdn image (amd64) using sysinst (update flow) and I was surprised that netbsd kernel was copied to file with unusual /netbsdIleNEk name instead of /netbsd. Thus, I needed to recopy it manually to netbsd. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to d

Re: Weird ldd problem

2021-07-18 Thread RVP
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: # file ksh93 ksh93: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /usr/libexec/ld.elf_so, for NetBSD 9.99.45, with debug_info, not stripped # ldd ./ksh93 ./ksh93: -lm.0 => /usr/lib/libm.so.0 -lc.12 =>

Re: Weird ldd problem

2021-07-18 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 10:26, RVP wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2021, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > > > # file ksh93 > > ksh93: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > > dynamically linked, interpreter /usr/libexec/ld.elf_so, for NetBSD > > 9.99.45, with debug_info, not stripped > > # ldd ./k

Weird ldd problem

2021-07-18 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
Hi, Not really a problem, but is bugging me, I have no clue why this happens. I used to follow the ksh93 development branch and regularly used to build it for -current. The last one I built was circa February 2020 (${.sh.version} -> 2020.0.0-beta1-222-g8cf92b28), apparently for NetBSD 9.99.45. It