Updating src tree:
P src/build.sh
P src/sys/arch/atari/conf/MILAN-ISAIDE
P src/sys/arch/atari/conf/MILAN-PCIIDE
P src/sys/arch/atari/conf/MILAN.in
P src/sys/arch/atari/pci/pci_vga.c
P src/sys/arch/mac68k/obio/esp.c
P src/sys/arch/mac68k/obio/espvar.h
P src/sys/dev/ic/nvme.c
P src/sys/dev/pci/gffb
Hej,
> Am 15.08.2022 um 14:27 schrieb Robert Elz :
>
>Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:54:11 +0200
>From:"os...@fessel.org"
>Message-ID: <6f327000-66c8-4b11-8792-2aad37d45...@fessel.org>
>
> | And cloning 9.99.95 just panics (syscall (number 5). while trying
> | cnopen()
hello. I just spun up a Linode server, which I think is also running a
Q35 virtual chip
set and it seems to work just fine, except that in paravirtual mode it doesn't
detect all the
disks. Is that the issue you all are seeing?
-thanks
-Brian
NetBSD 9.99.77 (LINODE) #0: Fri Aug 12 20:
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:54:11 +0200
From:"os...@fessel.org"
Message-ID: <6f327000-66c8-4b11-8792-2aad37d45...@fessel.org>
| And cloning 9.99.95 just panics (syscall (number 5). while trying
| cnopen().
If you can, try a very recent HEAD (certainly must be 9.99.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:35:21PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote:
> If "qemu -machine q35" fails to boot NetBSD in the same way then it will
> be a lot easier to resolve this.
It wasn't failing to boot. It was not detecting HDD and network.
For NetBSD 9.3 CD image I tried this and it is able to d
Hello Robert,
Am 15.08.2022 um 13:35 schrieb Robert Swindells:
If "qemu -machine q35" fails to boot NetBSD in the same way then it will
be a lot easier to resolve this.
unfortunately not... at least with machine type pc-q35-7.0 it boots for
me both NetBSD 9.3 and a current 9.99.99.
Beside o
Mayuresh wrote:
> Basically I do not know their motivation to switch over to Q35.
At a guess, it is closer in configuration to the host hardware so has
a lower overhead.
>It's just a perspective to convince a provider to give a setup that works
>for us, since there is no other way till NetBSD
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:55:21AM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote:
> I don't think we can claim that their configuration is "less portable",
> q35 has been in qemu since 2017.
But i440FX works on more OSes than Q35 - hence more portable!
Basically I do not know their motivation to switch over to Q
Mayuresh wrote:
>Hetzner maintains this issue to be a "bug in NetBSD", while we might try
>and convey a position that they are using configurations that are "less
>portable".
I don't think we can claim that their configuration is "less portable",
q35 has been in qemu since 2017.
Does using -ma
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:54:11AM +0200, os...@fessel.org wrote:
> I tried that, will see if they will do that (and when).
> But that is not really a viable solution since I tended to delete and
> recreate servers there.
> Which is no at least not instanteneously possible when support is needed f
Hej,
> Am 21.07.2022 um 09:49 schrieb Mayuresh :
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 08:17:08AM +0200, Matthias Petermann wrote:
>> At the moment, I only encounter the described problem when I select the AMD
>> variant. Mayuresh, can you confirm this?
>
> I did observe this. But they said the following
11 matches
Mail list logo
