Hello
in my daily tests of HEAD:
https://www-soc.lip6.fr/~bouyer/NetBSD-tests/xen/HEAD/
I've seen twice this panic:
kernel/kqueue/t_proc4 (80/939): 1 test cases
proc4: [ 538.1439841] uvm_fault(0xc287759c, 0, 2) -> 0xe
[ 538.1642020] fatal page fault in supervisor mode
[ 538.1755046] trap type
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
lib/libc/locale/t_mbstowcs:mbstowcs_basic
The above test failed in each of the last 5 test runs, and passed in
at least 25 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT,
I notice a separate image marked "bios"
NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz
NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-install.img.gz
So wonder, which installer
Hi,
little bit old topic,,,
> combination NetBSD 9.99.106 and Samba 4.16.5(from pkgsrc 2022Q3),
> the name resolution for usernames / groups via nss_winbind does not work
> anymore.
I've also faced this issue on NetBSD 9.99.10[68], 10.99.1 and net/samba4
4.16.x, 4.17.x
however,
NetBSD 9.99.108
Mayuresh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT,
I notice a separate image marked "bios"
NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz
NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-install.img.gz
So wond
On 22/12/22 02:33, Mayuresh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT,
I notice a separate image marked "bios"
NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz
NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-
Does this help? https://ogris.de/samba/unix-active-directory.html
christos
> On Dec 21, 2022, at 11:31 AM, Kunihiro Yasukouchi
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> little bit old topic,,,
>
>> combination NetBSD 9.99.106 and Samba 4.16.5(from pkgsrc 2022Q3),
>> the name resolution for usernames / groups via
Salil Wadnerkar writes:
> Mayuresh wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
>>> I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT,
>> I notice a separate image marked "bios"
>>
>> NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz
>> Net
Greg Troxel wrote:
Salil Wadnerkar writes:
Mayuresh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT,
I notice a separate image marked "bios"
NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:18:41AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> I used the second (non-BIOS) image because I guessed it might be a hybrid
> installer. I think that my old NUCs only support BIOS booting from USB
> sticks, but I could easily be wrong.
Ok. So, it appears the -bios image has become re
Updating src tree:
P src/external/bsd/nsd/Makefile.inc
P src/external/bsd/unbound/Makefile.inc
P
src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_interceptors_ioctl_netbsd.inc
P
src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_netbsd.cc
P
src
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 08:05:02AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Ok. So, it appears the -bios image has become redundant now. Or hasn't it?
No, there are BIOSes out there that don't work with the hybrid bootloader.
Martin
12 matches
Mail list logo