Re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 1 Jan 2023 19:17:54 -0800 (PST) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | FWIW, touch(1)ing all copies of bfd.info gets us past the ``build.sh | tools'' successfully. I have seen no new issues. I just updated to get Matt's changes (no arbitrary touching in the

Re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread Paul Goyette
| can you update and post the latest failures? Will do. FWIW, touch(1)ing all copies of bfd.info gets us past the ``build.sh tools'' successfully. I have seen no new issues. ++--+--+ | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint:

daily CVS update output

2023-01-01 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/bfd/Makefile.in P src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/bfd/doc/local.mk P src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/ld/Makefile.in P src/external/gpl3/binutils.old/dist/bfd/doc/Makefile.am P src/external/gpl3/binutils.old/dist/bfd/doc/Makefile.in P

Re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:17:11 +1100 From:matthew green Message-ID: <10634.1672622...@splode.eterna.com.au> | can you update and post the latest failures? Will do. kre

re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread matthew green
Robert Elz writes: > I wonder if perhaps part of the reason (or perhaps all of it) that > Paul and I see problems, where others aren't, is that we are both > building from a read only mounted source tree. oh yeah - this is only going to break r/o src tree builds, which is also something i use as

Re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:45:16 +1100 From:matthew green Message-ID: <8109.1672591...@splode.eterna.com.au> | it's not seen by most because it depends upon the timestamps of | some files.. I am also having issues (with very recently updated sources). I wonder if

re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread Paul Goyette
> > Sources updated to 2022-12-31 at 13:42:04 UTC and all output dirs > > (obj, release, dist, tools) were cleaned. > > Is no-one else seeing this problem with ``build.sh tools'' ? it's not seen by most because it depends upon the timestamps of some files.. my first attempt to fix it failed, i

re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread matthew green
> > Sources updated to 2022-12-31 at 13:42:04 UTC and all output dirs (obj, > > release, dist, tools) were cleaned. > > Is no-one else seeing this problem with ``build.sh tools'' ? it's not seen by most because it depends upon the timestamps of some files.. my first attempt to fix it failed, i

Re: binutils still failing on amd64

2023-01-01 Thread Paul Goyette
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022, Paul Goyette wrote: Sources updated to 2022-12-31 at 13:42:04 UTC and all output dirs (obj, release, dist, tools) were cleaned. Is no-one else seeing this problem with ``build.sh tools'' ? ===> build.sh command:./build.sh -T /build/netbsd-current/tools/x86_64/amd64

Re: 10.0 BETA modular X11: amdgpu_dri.so not found

2023-01-01 Thread Mayuresh
On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 12:56:31AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote: > Does base X11 provide and is it advisable to use the base X11 for this > hardware? Installed native X11 sets and it seems to work fine. Wonder what `magic' native X11 sets have that cannot be replicated with native... -- Mayuresh