The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again.
The following commits were made between the last failed build and the
first successful build:
2023.06.27.09.10.25 martin src/external/mpl/dhcp/dist/common/dispatch.c 1.4
Logs can be found at:
http://releng.NetBSD.org/b5reports/i386/commit
Hi all.
I'm currently running HEAD from about June 14. My system has been
having what appear to be temperature related issues (those are not
the point of this e-mail).
As part of attempting to deal with (or diagnose) what is happening
there, I switched the CPU frequency to go slower (slower CPU
Updating src tree:
P src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/include/crypto/bn_conf.h
cvs update: `src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/include/internal/bn_conf.h' is no
longer in the repository
cvs update: `src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/include/internal/dso_conf.h' is no
longer in the repository
P src/cr
k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) writes:
>sysctl -w machdep.cpu.frequency.target=3D2500
>(reducing from the apparent max, 3401) the temps dropped (almost
>instantly) from upper 30's (C) to low 40's, down to the high teens
>or very low 20's.
coretemp temperatures in that range are unlikely to be t
k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) writes:
>cpu0: "12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-12900KS"
The chip apparently reports a Tjmax of 100 C (as for the non-selected chip)
but actually has a real Tjmax of 115 C.
There are two caveats:
Our driver ignores Tjmax of > 110 C (and uses 100 C as default). If t
Hi.
On 2023/06/28 14:24, Michael van Elst wrote:
> k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) writes:
>
>> cpu0: "12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-12900KS"
>
> The chip apparently reports a Tjmax of 100 C (as for the non-selected chip)
> but actually has a real Tjmax of 115 C.
https://ark.intel.com/content/w
