Updating src tree:
P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi
P src/lib/libc/sys/Makefile.inc
P src/lib/libc/sys/fcntl.2
U src/lib/libc/sys/memfd_create.2
P src/lib/libm/Makefile
P src/share/man/man4/ddb.4
P src/sys/arch/alpha/include/mutex.h
P src/sys/arch/hppa/include/mutex.h
P src/sys/arch/ia64/include/
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 17:41, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
>
> > I was using fdisk to setup a USB key on NetBSD-10 and noticed its
> > still defaulting to 63 sector offset, including when "1m" is entered:
>
> fdisk(8) man says:
> > -A ptn_alignment[/ptn_0_offset]
> [..]
> >
We often get reports of the form `system is hung with processes stuck
in tstile again, must be the same problem as '.
Unfortunately, these are usually _not_ the same problem, or even
related in more than a superficial way, because `processes stuck in
tstile' just means `waiting for a lock'. And t
> I was using fdisk to setup a USB key on NetBSD-10 and noticed its
> still defaulting to 63 sector offset, including when "1m" is entered:
fdisk(8) man says:
> -A ptn_alignment[/ptn_0_offset]
[..]
>If
>
This should work:
fdisk -0 -A 2048 -u sd0
-RVP
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 02:52:01PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> Does anyone know offhand what alignment Linux/FreeBSD/OpenBSD pick for
> MBR formatting?
You should avoid MBR :-)
I don't know other systems defaults, but sysinst uses 4k for small
disks and 2m for bigger, unless you switch to sing
I was using fdisk to setup a USB key on NetBSD-10 and noticed its
still defaulting to 63 sector offset, including when "1m" is entered:
I can understand wanting to align to real cylinders on ancient fixed
track-per cylinder disks, but it makes no sense on even modern
spinning rust, let alone solid
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 11:14, Mike Pumford wrote:
>
> On 08/07/2023 23:06, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> > Would it be worth trying to collect some data on users running NetBSD
> > on intel display hardware, to see if there are any cases where
> > intel_drv works and modesetting_drv does not?
> >
> > A
nia wrote:
> After some testing on a Skylake machine, I've concluded
> that xf86-video-modesetting is far superior to xf86-video-intel
> on that generation of Intel hardware - the most obvious thing
> is that modesetting has functional VSync and superior 3D performance
> with less tearing.
>
> O
On 08/07/2023 23:06, David Brownlee wrote:
Would it be worth trying to collect some data on users running NetBSD
on intel display hardware, to see if there are any cases where
intel_drv works and modesetting_drv does not?
As a datapoint, on a Thinkpad T480 runs OK with the default intel_dev.
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 00:55, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/07/23 10:06, David Brownlee wrote:
> > What would be a good benchmark to stress the system a little?
>
> A while back someone mentioned pkgsrc/benchmarks/glmark2 and so I
> started using that. It seems reasonable.
Besides that, I also
11 matches
Mail list logo
