daily CVS update output

2023-08-19 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/dist/pf/sbin/pflogd/pflogd.c P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/debug/shl.mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi P src/external/gpl3/gdb/dist/gnulib/configure P src/external/gpl3/gdb/dist/gnulib/import/m4/rename.m4 U src/external/gpl3/gdb/lib/libb

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2023-08-19 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2023.08.19.22.58.15. An extract from the build.sh output follows: # install /tmp/build/2023.08.19.22.58.15-i386/d

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

2023-08-19 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the NetBSD test suite. The newly failing test cases are: net/ipsec/t_ipsec_gif:ipsec_gif_ipv4_transport_ah_hmacsha512 net/ipsec/t_ipsec_gif:ipsec_gif_ipv4_transport_ah_null net/ipsec/t_ipsec_gif:ipsec_gif_ipv4_transport_esp_

builds fail w/undef ref in rump tests

2023-08-19 Thread John D. Baker
Now that the MKCROSSGDB and new libpcap issues seem to have been ironed out, my builds (all arches) have resumed failing due to the following (evbmips-mips64el shown, sparc, macppc, dreamcast, i386, amd64 show the same failure): [...] #create fs/Atffile dependall ===> tests/rump dependall ===

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

2023-08-19 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the first successful build: 2023.08.19.14.22.41 rjs src/distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.mi 1.963 2023.08.19.14.22.41 rjs src/distrib/sets/lists/debug/shl.mi 1.323 Logs can be fou

Re: Growth in pool usage between netbsd-9 and -10?

2023-08-19 Thread Greg Troxel
Paul Ripke writes: >> That seems a little excessive, to my eye? Is this "normal"? Having >1/4 of >> RAM >> apparently used mostly for file metadata, if I'm reading this correctly? I >> don't recall the usage under -9, unfortunately, but I also never had a reason >> to look. In general, kernel m

Re: Growth in pool usage between netbsd-9 and -10?

2023-08-19 Thread Greg Troxel
Paul Ripke writes: > Following up, I see buf2k allocated when I run 'git status' under > netbsd/pkgsrc, > netbsd/src, etc repos. I also see growth during /etc/daily. The filesystem is > ffsv2 with log, on raidframe raid1 of wd[01]a. You might try setting kern.maxvnodes to 64 and then back and s